| Literature DB >> 33076637 |
Woosuck Suh1, Bi Na Kim1, Hyun Mi Kang1, Eun Ae Yang1, Jung-Woo Rhim1, Kyung-Yil Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiology and prevalence of febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) in children is important for risk stratification and selecting appropriate urine sample collection candidates to aid in its diagnosis and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Acute pyelonephritis; Antibiotics susceptibility; Etiology; Resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 33076637 PMCID: PMC8181017 DOI: 10.3345/cep.2020.00773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Pediatr ISSN: 2713-4148
Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with febrile urinary tract infection (N=359)
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Male sex | 211 (58.8) |
| Age (mo) | |
| Total | 5.1 (3.0–10.5) |
| Male | 4.1 (2.6–6.2) |
| Female | 8.0 (4.6–44.0) |
| Gram-negative | 329 (91.6) |
| MDR strain | 143 (43.5) |
| ESBL producer | 54 (16.4) |
| Fever day at admission (day) | 2 (1–3) |
| Fever duration (day) | 3 (2–5) |
| Duration of hospitalization (day) | 6 (5–7) |
| Vesicoureteral reflux | 31 (8.6) |
| Abnormal kidney ultrasonography[ | 163 (45.5) |
| Abnormal DMSA scan[ | 233 (67.0) |
| Recurrence | 30 (8.4) |
Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).
DMSA, dimercaptosuccinic acid; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; MDR, multidrug resistance.
Citrobacter freundii, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter species, Klebsiella species, Morganella morganii, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia fonticola.
Positive kidney ultrasonography findings (n=358).
Total number of patients who underwent DMSA scans (n=348).
Fig. 1.Age and sex distribution. (A) Age distribution of the patients diagnosed with acute pyelonephritis at younger than 36 months of age showing that 78.0% (n=280 of 359) were younger than 12 months old and 83.6% (n=300 of 359) were younger than 24 months old. (B) Sex distribution of patients by age showing that a male predominance is seen only among patients younger than 12 months of age.
Etiology of acute pyelonephritis (N=359)
| Etiology | No. of cases (%) |
|---|---|
| 301 (83.8) | |
| 24 (6.7) | |
| 13 (3.6) | |
| 5 (1.4) | |
| 4 (1.1) | |
| 3 (0.8) | |
| 2 (0.6) | |
| 1 (0.3) | |
| 2 (0.6) | |
| 1 (0.3) | |
| 1 (0.3) | |
| 1 (0.3) | |
| 1 (0.3) |
Fig. 2.Comparison of antibiotic susceptibilities between 2006–2010 and 2011–2016. Ampicillin (AMP), ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP/SULB), cefazolin (1st GEN CEPHA), cefuroxime (2nd GEN CEPHA), cefotaxime (3rd GEN CEPHA), cefepime (4th GEN CEPHA), ciprofloxacin (CIPRO)amikacin (AMK), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ).
Fig. 3.Trend in proportion of MDR and ESBL-producing pathogens in fUTI. A significantly increasing trend of multidrug-resistant eGNRs causing fUTI was observed. The proportion of MDR eGNRs causing fUTI was 35.7% in 2006 versus 51.9% in 2016 (P<0.001). The same trend was observed with the proportion of fUTI caused by ESBL producers: 7.1% in 2006 and 20.4% in 2016 (P<0.001). eGNR, enteric gram-negative rods; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; fUTI, febrile urinary tract infection; MDR, multidrug-resistant.
Fig. 4.Trend in the increase in eGNR resistance by antibiotic. A significant linear increasing trend was observed for ampicillin-sulbactam, all generations of cephalosporin, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem. eGNR, enteric gram-negative rods.
Comparison of clinical characteristics of MDR versus non-MDR and ESBL vs. non-ESBL producers among gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae
| Variable | Non-MDR (n=186) | MDR (n=143) | Non-ESBL producing (n=275) | ESBL producing (n=54) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex | 116 (62.4) | 76 (53.2) | 0.117 | 158 | 34 | 0.549 |
| Age (yr) | 4.3 (2.7–8.0) | 5.6 (3.7–13.1) | 4.9 (2.9–9.3) | 5.5 (3.1–30.3) | 0.093 | |
| Fever day at admission (day) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–4) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–4) | 0.75 | |
| Total fever duration (day) | 3 (2–4) | 3 (2–4) | 0.118 | 3 (2–4) | 3 (2–5) | 0.904 |
| Time to defervescence (day) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | 0.732 | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | 0.965 |
| Duration of hospitalization (day) | 6 (5–7) | 6 (5–7) | 6 (5–7) | 6 (5–8) | ||
| Total WBC count (×10³/µL³) | 14.5 (10.6–18.7) | 15.6 (12.5–19.7) | 0.103 | 15.4 (11.7–19.1) | 15.0 (11.1–19.4) | 0.676 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dL) | 4.2 (2.2–7.9) | 4.8 (2.8–8.3) | 0.315 | 4.4 (2.3–8.3) | 4.7 (1.5–7.7) | 0.844 |
Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).
MDR, multidrug-resistant; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; WBC, white blood cell.
Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P<0.05.
Comparison of recurrence rates depending on the presence of VUR in patients with fUTI caused by ESBL vs. non-ESBL producers
| Variable | ESBL producer | Non-ESBL producer | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients without VUR | 3/46 (6.5) | 12/255 (4.7) | 0.602 |
| Patient with VUR[ | |||
| Total recurrence | 6/8 (75.0) | 9/20 (45.0) | 0.15 |
| Recurrence within 6 months | 6/8 (75.0) | 6/20 (30.0) |
VUR, vesicoureteral reflux; fUTI, febrile urinary tract infection; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase.
Any grade.
Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P<0.05.