Literature DB >> 33075163

Adapting the telephone assessment and skill-building kit to the telehealth technology preferences of stroke family caregivers.

Tamilyn Bakas1, Michael J McCarthy2, Jahmeel Israel1, Bonnie J Brehm1, Kari Dunning3, Matthew Rota1, Mickenna Turner1, Elaine L Miller1.   

Abstract

Family caregivers exhibit a wide variety of needs and concerns while providing care to stroke survivors after discharge to the home setting. We report the results of two related studies utilizing a multimethod design in which stroke family caregivers (N = 12; N = 10) were interviewed using open-ended questions, followed by written caregiver ratings regarding the types of telehealth technologies they preferred for the telephone assessment and skill-building kit (TASK III). Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis procedures with a provisional "start list" of codes in a matrix template based on the types of telehealth technologies in the rating forms. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze ratings with response scales ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Average ratings for the telehealth technologies for the TASK III resource guide were obtained for the mailed hard copy binder (M = 3.58-4.13; SD = 0.35-1.00), an interactive website (https://www.task3web.com/; M = 3.86-4.17; SD = .72-1.07), an eBook (M = 3.17-3.67; SD = 0.84-1.17), and a USB drive (M = 3.75-4.00; SD = .82-.96). Average ratings for the telehealth technologies for the TASK III calls with the nurse were obtained for the use of a telephone (M = 4.36-5.00; SD = 0.00-0.89), FaceTime on an iOS device (e.g., iPhone or iPad; M = 3.73-4.40; SD = 0.79-0.98), or online videoconferencing (M = 3.17-3.50; SD = 0.82-1.47). Qualitative data revealed a wide variety of preferences for each type of telehealth technology, with advantages and disadvantages of each. The findings underscored the importance of offering multiple telehealth technology options to stroke family caregivers. Future studies are recommended that employ randomized control trial methodology to test theoretically-based interventions that are based on stroke family caregiver preferences for telehealth technologies.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregivers; intervention; stroke; technology; telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33075163      PMCID: PMC8600444          DOI: 10.1002/nur.22075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Technology-Based Interventions on Informal Caregivers of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Yousef Aldehaim; Faisal F Alotaibi; Constance R Uphold; Stuti Dang
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  The effect of a Web-based stroke intervention on carers' well-being and survivors' use of healthcare services.

Authors:  Linda L Pierce; Victoria L Steiner; Sadik A Khuder; Amy L Govoni; Lawrence J Horn
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Alvaro Alonso; Emelia J Benjamin; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Amanda Marma Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Christina M Shay; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Lisa B VanWagner; Connie W Tsao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Update on the State of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Michael McCarthy; Elaine T Miller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  The stroke caregiver unmet resource needs scale: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  Rosemarie B King; Robert J Hartke; Jungwha Lee; Jason Raad
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.230

Review 6.  Evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Patricia C Clark; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Rosemarie B King; Barbara J Lutz; Elaine L Miller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Enhancing preparedness and satisfaction of caregivers of patients discharged from an inpatient rehabilitation facility using an interactive website.

Authors:  Karon Stone
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 1.625

8.  Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomized clinical trial of a Web-based intervention.

Authors:  Gregory C Smith; Nichole Egbert; Mary Dellman-Jenkins; Kevin Nanna; Patrick A Palmieri
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2012-08

Review 9.  Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Nicole Krowski; Blanca Rodriguez; Lan Tran; Jackeline Vela; Matthew Brooks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Personalized Telehealth in the Future: A Global Research Agenda.

Authors:  Birthe Dinesen; Brandie Nonnecke; David Lindeman; Egon Toft; Kristian Kidholm; Kamal Jethwani; Heather M Young; Helle Spindler; Claus Ugilt Oestergaard; Jeffrey A Southard; Mario Gutierrez; Nick Anderson; Nancy M Albert; Jay J Han; Thomas Nesbitt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stroke Family Caregiver Life Changes From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Elaine T Miller; Kelly E Stacy; Tamilyn Bakas
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 2.  Systematic Review of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Michael J McCarthy; Elaine L Miller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 10.170

3.  Factors impacting the access and use of formal health and social services by caregivers of stroke survivors: an interpretive description study.

Authors:  Anna Garnett; Jenny Ploeg; Maureen Markle-Reid; Patricia H Strachan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.