Literature DB >> 33074873

Underrepresented Minorities in Surgical Residencies: Where are They? A Call to Action to Increase the Pipeline.

Ajaratu Keshinro1, Spiros Frangos1,2, Russell S Berman1,2, Charles DiMaggio1,2, Michael J Klein1,2, Marko Bukur1,2, Akuezunkpa Ude Welcome1,2, Hersch Leon Pachter1, Cherisse Berry1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate trends of general surgery residency applicants, matriculants, and graduates over the last 13 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The application and matriculation rates of URMs to medical school has remained unchanged over the last three decades with Blacks and Hispanics representing 7.1% and 6.3% of matriculants, respectively. With each succession along the surgical career pathway, from medical school to residency to a faculty position, the percentage of URMs decreases.
METHODS: The Electronic Residency Application Service to General Surgery Residency and the Graduate Medical Education Survey of residents completing general surgery residency were retrospectively analyzed (2005-2018). Data were stratified by race, descriptive statistics were performed, and time series were charted.
RESULTS: From 2005 to 2018, there were 71,687 Electronic Residency Application Service applicants to general surgery residencies, 26,237 first year matriculants, and 24,893 general surgery residency graduates. Whites followed by Asians represented the highest percentage of applicants (n = 31,197, 43.5% and n = 16,602, 23%), matriculants (n = 16,395, 62.5% and n = 4768, 18.2%), and graduates (n = 15,239, 61% and n = 4804, 19%). For URMs, the applicants (n = 8603, 12%, P < 0.00001), matriculants (n = 2420, 9.2%, P = 0.0158), and graduates (n = 2508, 10%, P = 0.906) remained significantly low and unchanged, respectively, whereas the attrition was significantly higher (3.6%, P = 0.049) when compared to Whites (2.6%) and Asians (2.9%).
CONCLUSION: Significant disparities in the application, matriculation, graduation, and attrition rates for general surgery residency exists for URMs. A call to action is needed to re-examine and improve existing recommendations/paradigms to increase the number of URMs in the surgery training pipeline.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074873     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  3 in total

1.  Bursting the Hidden Curriculum Bubble: A Surgical Near-Peer Mentorship Pilot Program for URM Medical Students.

Authors:  Sophia Hernandez; Ogonna N Nnamani Silva; Patricia Conroy; Lucas Weiser; Avery Thompson; Sarah Mohamedaly; Taylor M Coe; Adnan Alseidi; Andre R Campbell; Julie Ann Sosa; Jessica Gosnell; Matthew Y C Lin; Sanziana A Roman
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Serial measurement of pancreatic stone protein for the early detection of sepsis in intensive care unit patients: a prospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Philippe Eggimann; Bruno François; Jérôme Pugin; Thomas Daix; Jean-Luc Pagani; Davide Morri; Angelo Giacomucci; Pierre-François Dequin; Christophe Guitton; Yok-Ai Que; Gianluca Zani; David Brealey; Alain Lepape; Ben Creagh-Brown; Duncan Wyncoll; Daniela Silengo; Irina Irincheeva; Laurie Girard; Fabien Rebeaud; Iwan Maerki
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  The drawbacks of advantages.

Authors:  Jonathan Koea
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 7.647

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.