Literature DB >> 33074592

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Piyakorn Poonyam1, Natsuda Aumpan1, Ratha-Korn Vilaichone1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer ranks as a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Information of prognostic factors related to gastric cancer are limited. AIM: This study aimed to gather clinical data and prevalence of prognostic factors related to gastric adenocarcinoma in Thailand. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand between January 2010 and July 2018. Gastric adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled and followed up for at least 5 years. Total of 210 gastric tumor patients were enrolled. One hundred patients were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinomas (57 men and 43 women, mean age = 61.1 years). The leading presenting symptoms were weight loss (65%), followed by dyspepsia (54%) and UGI bleeding. Common clinical manifestations were thrombocytosis (26%), followed by syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH; 15%). Eosinophilia was present in early cancer (25.0% vs 6.5%, P = .123), while SIADH and thrombocytosis were more common in advanced stages (16.3% vs 0%, P = .602, and 28.3% vs 0%, P = .108, respectively). SIADH was significantly related to reduced 1-year survival rate compared to normal serum sodium levels (21.4% vs 71.4%, OR 0.109, 95% CI 0.024-0.497, P = .004). Five-year survival rates were worse in patients with SIADH, but better in patients with eosinophilia compared to patients without these conditions (0% vs 27.8%, P = .058 and 20.0% vs 7.8%, P = .375, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Thrombocytosis and SIADH were common in gastric cancer. SIADH was significantly correlated with poor 1-year survival. These clinical manifestations might be useful for predicting gastric cancer prognosis.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; prognostic factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074592      PMCID: PMC7941448          DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2573-8348


INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers leading to cancer‐related deaths worldwide. The GLOBOCAN database 2018 noted that more than 1 million people per year were newly diagnosed with gastric cancer. Most patients present at an advanced unresectable stage resulting in high mortality rate second only to lung cancer. Gastric cancer incidence varied among geographic regions. East Asian countries including the Republic of Korea and Japan have the highest incidence, whereas the rates are low in North America and Africa. Thailand is the second largest country in mainland Southeast Asia with approximately 69 million people. The age‐standardized incidence rate of gastric cancer in Thailand was relatively low (3.1 per 100 000) compared to other Asian countries (14.3 per 100 000). However, gastric cancer ranked ninth in cancer mortality due to its grave prognosis especially in younger patients. The majority of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas. Helicobacter pylori, a gram‐negative rod‐shaped bacterium, has been recognized as the most important factor associated with gastric cancer. , , H. pylori infection causes persistent gastric mucosal inflammation producing oxidative stress and DNA damage. Gastric glands subsequently undergo precancerous differentiation and eventually become malignant cells. H. pylori eradication is considered the most effective strategy to reduce the incidence of gastric cancer. , Apart from bacterial factors, host genetic polymorphisms promoting an inflammatory response and environmental factors such as high dietary salt intake are linked to an increased risk of gastric cancer. , In addition to avoiding modifiable risk factors, recognition of symptoms and signs is also important for cancer diagnosis. More than half of gastric cancer patients have predominant symptoms of weight loss (61.6%) and abdominal pain (51.6%). Some signs and symptoms may occur as a result from the immune response against malignant cells. Previous studies reported atypical clinical features such as abrupt onset of numerous seborrheic keratoses (Leser‐Trélat sign), and acanthosis nigricans in gastric cancer patients. , Until now, there have been few modern era reports about prognostic factors related to survival rate of gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to gather clinical data and prevalence of each prognostic factors related to gastric cancer in Thailand.

METHODS

Study design

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital between January 2010 and July 2018. Patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as indicated by Gastroenterology Association of Thailand (GAT). Gastric biopsies from a lesion suspicious for gastric cancer were then performed by gastroenterologists. The inclusion criteria were patients aged more than 18 years old with gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed by histopathological results of gastric biopsies. Patients with incomplete medical records were excluded from the study. Demographic data, underlying diseases, clinical information, laboratory profiles such as complete blood count, tumor markers (CEA, CA 19‐9), endoscopic features, histopathological results, current H. pylori infection status, complications, and treatment outcomes were extracted from medical records and retrospectively reviewed. Cancer staging was defined by TNM classification at the time of diagnosis. Long‐term follow‐up data of patients were monitored for at least 5 years after cancer diagnosis.

Definitions

H. pylori infection was defined as positive results of rapid urease test, or presence of H. pylori in histopathology of gastric biopsy. Early stage cancer was defined as primary gastric tumor with the depth of invasion no more than submucosa regardless of lymph node involvement. By TNM classification, early stage gastric cancer comprised T1 and any N. Leukocytosis was defined as white blood cell count more than 11 000/μL without causes of infection, inflammation, myeloproliferative neoplasms, or medications such as glucocorticoids. Eosinophilia was defined as eosinophil count more than 500/μL without causes of allergic disorders, parasitic infection, or hematologic malignancies. Thrombocytosis was defined as platelet count more than 400 000/μL without causes of infection, inflammation, or iron deficiency anemia. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) was defined as hyponatremia (plasma sodium <135 mEq/L) in euvolemic patients. The plasma osmolality is less than 280 mOsm/kg, while urine osmolality is more than 100 mOsm/kg. The urine sodium is more than 40 mEq/L. Others etiologies of SIADH such as central nervous system disorders, infection, or medications were excluded. Hypercalcemia was defined as corrected calcium of more than 10.5 mg/dL. Cancer cachexia was defined as >5% weight loss in the past 6 months without starvation or body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 and ongoing weight loss of >2%.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). The demographic data were analysed by Fisher's exact test, or Chi‐square test where appropriate. P‐value of less than .05 was defined as statistical significance. The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University, Thailand and was conducted according to the good clinical practice guideline, as well as the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

A total of 210 gastric tumor patients were enrolled. One hundred patients were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinomas (57 men and 43 women, mean age of 61.1 years). The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (28%), followed by dyslipidemia (18%). The most common presenting symptoms of gastric adenocarcinomas were weight loss (65%), dyspepsia (54%), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (males vs females: 22.8% vs 7.0%, OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.05‐14.84, P = .033); the least common symptom was dysphagia (13%). Smoking was more common in men (32.6% vs 2.9%, OR 16.41, 95% CI 2.03‐132.49, P = .009). The overall rate of active H. pylori infection in gastric cancer patients was 46%. There was no patient with family history of gastric cancer. Intestinal‐type gastric cancer was more predominant than diffuse type in both genders (68.4% in men and 53.5% in women). The overall 1‐year survival rate was 48.9%. The 1‐year survival rate was slightly higher in men than women (51.0% vs 46.2%). Demographic data including gender, age, comorbidities, type of cancer, cancer staging, and 1‐year survival rate are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Demographic data of gastric cancer patients classified by genders

CharacteristicsMale (N = 57)Female (N = 43) P value
Age (years ± SD)63.1 ± 15.258.4 ± 14.8.128
BMI (kg/m2 ± SD)19.1 ± 3.119.5 ± 4.6.705
Comorbidities
None28 (49.1%)29 (67.4%).067
Diabetes mellitus8 (14.0%)7 (16.3%).756
Hypertension20 (35.1%)8 (18.6%).069
Dyslipidemia12 (21.1%)6 (14.0%).360
Chronic kidney disease4 (7.0%)1 (2.3%).387
Ischemic heart disease3 (5.3%)1 (2.3%).632
Cerebrovascular accident5 (8.8%)1 (2.3%).233
Chronic obstructive2 (3.5%)0 (0%).505
pulmonary disease
Cirrhosis8 (14.0%)5 (11.6%).723
Clinical presentation
Weight loss36 (63.2%)29 (67.4%).657
Dyspepsia27 (47.4%)27 (62.8%).126
Anorexia18 (31.6%)20 (46.5%).128
Nausea and vomiting15 (26.3%)10 (23.3%).726
Anemic symptoms15 (26.3%)12 (27.9%).859
GI bleeding13 (22.8%)3 (7.0%).033
Dysphagia5 (8.8%)8 (18.6%).148
H. pylori infection25 (43.9%)21 (48.8%).621
Family history of GI cancer5 (8.8%)3 (7.0%)1.000
Smoking14 (32.6%)1 (2.9%).009
Cancer type
Intestinal type39 (68.4%)23 (53.5%).128
Diffuse type18 (31.6%)20 (46.5%).128
Cancer TNM staging
Stage I2 (3.5%)1 (2.3%)1.000
Stage II3 (5.3%)3 (7.0%)1.000
Stage III17 (29.8%)18 (41.9%).212
Stage IV35 (61.4%)21 (48.8%).210
Cancer staging
Early stage5 (8.8%)3 (7.0%)1.000
Advanced stage52 (91.2%)40 (93.0%)1.000
1‐year survival rate26/51 (51.0%)18/39 (46.2%).650
Demographic data of gastric cancer patients classified by genders The most common clinical manifestations related to gastric cancer were cancer cachexia (62%), followed by thrombocytosis (26%), SIADH (15%), and eosinophilia (8%) as demonstrated in Table 2. Hematologic manifestations were present in 37 patients including thrombocytosis, eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and venous thromboembolisms in 26 (70.2%), 8 (21.6%), 8 (21.6%), and 3 (8.1%) patients, respectively. Patients with other causes of reactive thrombocytosis such as infection, or iron deficiency anemia were excluded from paraneoplastic thrombocytosis. In the same way, leukocytosis and eosinophilia from other causes such as parasitic infection, or medication were excluded. Paraneoplastic thrombocytosis, hypercoagulability, and leukocytosis were present only in advanced‐stage patients (28.3% vs 0%, P = .108, 3.3% vs 0%, P = 1.000, and 8.7% vs 0%, P = 1.000, respectively), while eosinophilia was more prevalent in early stage disease (25.0% vs 6.5%, P = .123). Massive leukocytosis was a rare manifestation present in only one patient (ie, a 35‐year‐old man with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma and an absolute neutrophil count of 70 800 per mm3). Three patients had malignant thrombosis according to hypercoagulable stage related to gastric cancer. One patient presented with bilateral pulmonary embolism and inferior mesenteric vein thrombosis. The second one had inferior vena cava thrombosis extending downwards to right common iliac vein. Another had deep vein thrombosis of left leg.
TABLE 2

Clinical manifestations classified by gender and stage of cancer

FactorsTotal (N = 100)Male (N = 57)Female (N = 43) P‐valueEarly (N = 8)Advanced (N = 92) P‐value
Cachexia6236 (63.2%)26 (60.5%).7841 (12.5%)61 (66.3%).016
Hematologic system3720 (35.1%)17 (39.5%).6482 (25.0%)35 (38.0%).469
Thrombocytosis2613 (22.8%)13 (30.2%).402026 (28.3%).108
Hypercoagulability31 (1.8%)2 (4.7%).57603 (3.3%)1.000
Leukocytosis82 (3.5%)6 (14.0%).07208 (8.7%)1.000
Eosinophilia85 (8.8%)3 (7.0%)1.0002 (25.0%)6 (6.5%).123
Endocrine system166 (10.5%)10 (23.3%).086016 (17.4%).348
SIADH156 (10.5%)9 (20.9%).149015 (16.3%).602
Hypercalcemia21 (1.8%)1 (2.3%)1.00002 (2.2%)1.000

Abbreviation: SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.

Clinical manifestations classified by gender and stage of cancer Abbreviation: SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. Hyponatremia from SIADH was present in 15% of patients. The mean plasma sodium level at initial presentation of patients with SIADH was lower than that of hyponatremia from other causes as demonstrated in Figure 1 (126.2 ± 2.7 vs 132.5 ± 1.3, P < .001). All patients with SIADH had advanced cancer. Hypercalcemia was also present in only advanced disease. Two patients with hypercalcemia died within 1 year (3 and 9 months) after diagnosis.
FIGURE 1

The box plot of plasma sodium level

The box plot of plasma sodium level Disease outcomes within the first year after diagnosis could be evaluated in 90 patients as 10 (10%) were lost to follow‐up. Risk factors associated with mortality rate within 1 year are shown in Table 3. Mortality rate within 1 year after diagnosis was higher in advanced cancer than early disease (54.2% vs 14.3%, OR 7.11, 95% CI 0.82‐61.65, P = .075). Gender, age, and comorbidities did not exhibit significant associations with one‐year mortality rate. Anorexia was significantly associated with higher mortality rate within 1 year. (67.6% vs 39.6%, OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.32‐8.86, P = .011). SIADH was the only manifestation significantly related to lower 1‐year survival rate compared to normal serum sodium levels (21.4% vs 71.4%, OR 0.109, 95% CI 0.109‐0.497, P = .004) as demonstrated in Figure 2. The median survival time of gastric cancer patients with SIADH was 145 days (IQR 91‐315).
TABLE 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors associated with mortality rate within 1 year of gastric cancer patients

VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR(95% CI) P‐valueOR(95% CI) P‐value
Male gender0.82(0.36‐1.90).650
Age >60 years1.09(0.48‐2.49).837
Comorbidities1.01(0.44‐2.33).977
FH of GI cancer1.67(0.37‐7.44).503
Clinical presentation
Weight loss1.18(0.50‐2.82).708
Dyspepsia1.56(0.67‐3.61).302
Anorexia3.18(1.32‐7.66).0103.42(1.32–8.86).011
Nausea and vomiting1.37(0.51‐3.67).529
Anemic symptoms0.75(0.29‐1.91).546
GI bleeding0.68(0.21‐2.13).503
Dysphagia0.50(0.14‐1.86).303
Cancer type
Intestinal type1
Diffuse type0.96(0.40‐2.30).927
Cancer staging
Advanced stage7.11(0.82‐61.65).075
Cachexia1.07(0.46‐2.52).869
Hematological lab values
Leukocytosis (>11 000/μL)1.30(0.27‐6.18).740
Eosinophilia (>500/μL)0.36(0.07‐1.93).231
Thrombocytosis (>400 000/μL)1.31(0.52‐3.32).565
Plasma sodium level
Normonatremia (≥135 mEq/L)11
Hyponatremia from other causes3.21(1.18‐8.73).0223.56(1.24‐10.19).018
SIADH9.17(2.01‐41.80).0049.65(1.99‐46.67).005

Abbreviation: SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone.

FIGURE 2

The 1‐year and 5‐year survival rates between groups according to sodium level

Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors associated with mortality rate within 1 year of gastric cancer patients Abbreviation: SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. The 1‐year and 5‐year survival rates between groups according to sodium level There were 69 patients included for estimating the 5‐year survival rate. Six patients were alive after diagnosis for 5 years. Patients with early cancer had superior 5‐year survival rate to advanced cancer (66.7% vs 6.1%, OR 31.0, 95% CI 2.29‐419.35, P = .01). Five‐year survival rates were worse in patients with SIADH, but better in patients with eosinophilia compared to patients without these conditions (0% vs 27.8%, P = .058 and 20.0% vs 7.8%, P = .375, respectively). One‐year and five‐year survival rates classified by sodium level and prognostic factors were demonstrated in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.
FIGURE 3

One‐year and five‐year survival rates classified by prognostic factors

One‐year and five‐year survival rates classified by prognostic factors

DISCUSSION

Gastric cancer has ranked as the second leading cause of global cancer mortality for more than 30 years. The global database revealed over 1 million new cases and approximately 783 000 deaths attributed to stomach cancer annually. Although the incidence and mortality rate remain high, there has been a decline in cancer mortality over the past 90 years. Reduction in gastric cancer mortality are explained in part by the discovery and eradication of H. pylori which is a significant risk factor for development of gastric cancer. In addition, the invention of electric refrigerators in the mid‐19th century improved quality of food storage by decreasing salt‐based food preservation and bacterial contamination. Thailand is the Southeast Asian country with low gastric cancer incidence (2.3%), but high H. pylori infection and its mortality rate is still high positioning in the ninth place of national cancer death statistics. Patients with gastric adenocarcinomas in this study demonstrated the usual male to female predominance with the ratio of 1.33 to 1 although the ratio was slightly lower than the previous study in Thailand and other countries. , Although previous studies observed protective effects of estrogen on gastric cancer, there was no difference in 1‐year survival rate between genders in this study. , Considering risk factors for gastric cancer, our study demonstrated no difference of H. pylori infection between gender and significantly higher history of smoking in males. Overall prevalence of current H. pylori infection in gastric cancer patients was 46% which was comparable to the previous study. The earlier study conducted in 10 European countries with low incidence of gastric cancer demonstrated that both current and former smokers were at higher risk of development of gastric cancer. The two most common presenting symptoms were weight loss (65%) and dyspepsia (54%) same as the prior report. In our study, 16% of patients presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding which was comparable to the previous report. However, the previous study did not mention patients presenting symptoms classified by gender. Furthermore, this study indicated that upper gastrointestinal bleeding as a clinical presentation in men significantly higher than women (22.8% vs 7.0%, OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.05‐14.84, P = .033). Apart from presenting symptoms, the important findings of this study highlighted common manifestations in gastric cancer patients and might have an impact on patient's prognosis. This study documented possible manifestations of various organ systems which developed in patients with gastric cancer. The most common clinical manifestation was cancer cachexia which was comparable to the previous study. Almost half of cancer patients presenting with cachexia had poor outcomes. The pathogenesis of cancer cachexia involves in tumor‐secreted cytokines stimulating hypothalamic response and subsequently leading to anorexia. Moreover, cytokines can potentiate catabolic state resulting in increased energy consumption along with protein breakdown and eventually cause reduced muscle mass. Thrombocytosis was the most frequent hematologic manifestation (26%) which was higher than prior studies in East Asian countries (6.4%‐11.4%). , This might be explained by greater number of advanced‐stage patients in this study than other countries. , The mechanisms of paraneoplastic thrombocytosis occurred by production of several cytokines such as interleukin‐1 (IL‐1), IL‐6, and IL‐11 in malignant solid tumors. IL‐6 overproduced by gastric cancer mediated the induction of hepatic thrombopoietin (TPO) mRNA expression resulting in rising of TPO level and consequently increasing a platelet count. , Elevation of platelet count found only in patients with advanced gastric cancer could be correlated to poor prognosis. However, there was no significant difference of survival rates between groups having thrombocytosis and normal platelet numbers. Apart from thrombocytosis, a hypercoagulable state can be caused by several mechanisms including procoagulant activity expressed by both normal human cells and cancer procoagulant itself. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) was established from hypercoagulable state associated with gastric cancer. All three patients having VTE were diagnosed with advanced‐stage gastric cancer. Two of them survived more than 1 year after diagnosis. The previous study revealed overall survival within VTE group of approximately 12 months and also stated that advanced disease with VTE contributed to almost three times higher mortality rates than early cancer without VTE. The second most common hematologic abnormalities were eosinophilia and leukocytosis. The prevalence of eosinophilia in this study was 8%. Patients experiencing eosinophilia were more likely to have early‐stage than advanced cancer. Moreover, both 1‐year and 5‐year survival rates of patients with eosinophilia were higher than patients with normal eosinophil count. This might be explained by anti‐tumorigenic factors, for example, TNF‐α, granzyme, and cationic proteins generated from eosinophils. The study in 1986 observed that eosinophilic infiltration in gastric tumors significantly corresponding to blood eosinophilia was a good prognostic marker for prolonged survival rate of patients with gastric cancer. In addition, the reappearance of eosinophilia was noted in patients with recurrent gastric cancer. On the contrary, there were a few case reports describing massive eosinophilia in advanced gastric cancers contributing to poor prognosis. , Leukocytosis was another hematologic manifestation presented in eight patients after excluding causes of infection, inflammation, medications, or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Some studies exhibited hyperleukocytosis as an uncommon paraneoplastic syndrome in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma. These rare events were caused by excessive secretion of serum granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and associated with poor prognosis. , However, there was no previous report of this condition in gastric cancer patients. Electrolyte abnormalities caused by endocrine disorders were present in gastric cancer patients. Hyponatremia from SIADH was evidently demonstrated only in advanced disease. This study demonstrated significantly lower 1‐year survival rate in patients with SIADH. No patients with SIADH survived after 5 years of diagnosis. The median survival time was less than 1 year in SIADH group designating poor prognosis possibly related to this condition. Until now, there has been no report about prevalence and prognosis of SIADH in gastric cancer patients. Two case reports demonstrated patients presenting with symptomatic hyponatremia with the initial plasma sodium level of less than 130 mEq/L. , The prior study indicated that terminal cancer was associated with hyponatremia and also mentioned that the lower the sodium level was, the shorter survival time the patient had left. Our study reported two patients with hypercalcemia diagnosed with advanced stage gastric cancer and subsequently died within 1 year after diagnosis. Hypercalcemia in gastric cancer might be a grave prognostic factor in this particular disease. ,

CONCLUSION

Gastric cancer is an important cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Smoking and upper GI bleeding were significantly common among men with gastric cancer. Thrombocytosis and SIADH were common in gastric cancer. SIADH was significantly correlated with poor 1‐year survival. These clinical manifestations might be useful for predicting gastric cancer prognosis.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study received ethical approval by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University, Thailand and was conducted according to the good clinical practice guideline, as well as the Declaration of Helsinki. The project number of ethical approval was MTU‐EC‐IM‐2‐160/61. All data had been fully anonymized before they were accessed. The Ethics Committee waived the requirement for informed consent because of no greater than minimal risk for participants.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Piyakorn Poonyam: Data curation; formal analysis; resources; writing‐original draft. Natsuda Aumpan: Formal analysis; writing‐original draft; writing‐review and editing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  44 in total

Review 1.  Eosinophils: The unsung heroes in cancer?

Authors:  Gilda Varricchi; Maria Rosaria Galdiero; Stefania Loffredo; Valeria Lucarini; Giancarlo Marone; Fabrizio Mattei; Gianni Marone; Giovanna Schiavoni
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus.

Authors:  Kenneth Fearon; Florian Strasser; Stefan D Anker; Ingvar Bosaeus; Eduardo Bruera; Robin L Fainsinger; Aminah Jatoi; Charles Loprinzi; Neil MacDonald; Giovanni Mantovani; Mellar Davis; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Faith Ottery; Lukas Radbruch; Paula Ravasco; Declan Walsh; Andrew Wilcock; Stein Kaasa; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Poor prognosis associated with thrombocytosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masataka Ikeda; Hiroshi Furukawa; Hiroshi Imamura; Jyunzo Shimizu; Hideyuki Ishida; Seizo Masutani; Masayuki Tatsuta; Takashi Satomi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Cancer cachexia syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and new therapeutic options.

Authors:  Patrizia Mondello; Michael Mian; Carmela Aloisi; Fausto Famà; Stefania Mondello; Vincenzo Pitini
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 5.  Thailand Consensus on Helicobacter pylori Treatment 2015.

Authors:  Varocha Mahachai; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone; Rapat Pittayanon; Jarin Rojborwonwitaya; Somchai Leelakusolvong; Chomsri Kositchaiwat; Pisaln Mairiang; Ong-Ard Praisontarangkul; Buncha Ovartlarnporn; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Pises Pisespongsa; Monthira Maneerattanaporn; Ravin Sony; Siam Sirinthornpunya; Orawan Chaiyamahapurk; Olarn Wiwattanachang; Inchaya Sansak; Piyathida Harnsomboon; Taned Chitapanarux; Surapon Chuenrattanakul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016

Review 6.  Effects of Estrogen on the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Xubiao Nie; Rui Xie; Biguang Tuo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Malignant acanthosis nigricans: an early diagnostic clue for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Qian Yu; Xiu-Li Li; Guo Ji; Yao Wang; Yu Gong; Hui Xu; Yu-Ling Shi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Low Re-infection Rate of Helicobacter pylori after Successful Eradication in Thailand: A 2 Years Study

Authors:  Ratha Korn Vilaichone; Arti Wongcha Um; Peranart Chotivitayatarakorn
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Paraneoplastic Hyperleukocytosis in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Evan S Wu; Samer A Srour
Journal:  J Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Prevalence, risk factors, and virulence genes of Helicobacter pylori among dyspeptic patients in two different gastric cancer risk regions of Thailand.

Authors:  Phawinee Subsomwong; Muhammad Miftahussurur; Tomohisa Uchida; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone; Thawee Ratanachu-Ek; Varocha Mahachai; Yoshio Yamaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Piyakorn Poonyam; Natsuda Aumpan; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-10-19

2.  Exploration of predictors of benefit from nivolumab monotherapy for patients with pretreated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: post hoc subanalysis from the ATTRACTION-2 study.

Authors:  Yoon-Koo Kang; Satoshi Morita; Taroh Satoh; Min-Hee Ryu; Yee Chao; Ken Kato; Hyun Cheol Chung; Jen-Shi Chen; Kei Muro; Won Ki Kang; Kun-Huei Yeh; Takaki Yoshikawa; Sang Cheul Oh; Li-Yuan Bai; Takao Tamura; Keun-Wook Lee; Yasuo Hamamoto; Jong Gwang Kim; Keisho Chin; Do-Youn Oh; Keiko Minashi; Jae Yong Cho; Masahiro Tsuda; Hiroki Sameshima; Li-Tzong Chen; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Elucidating the Role of Serum tRF-31-U5YKFN8DYDZDD as a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker in Gastric Cancer (GC).

Authors:  Yuejiao Huang; Haiyan Zhang; Xinliang Gu; Shiyi Qin; Ming Zheng; Xiangrong Shi; Chunlei Peng; Shaoqing Ju
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Gastric adenocarcinoma: 1-year overall survival, disability-adjusted life years, years of life lost, and prognostic factors-a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Tatiane Tiengo; Gisele Aparecida Fernandes; Maria Paula Curado
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.