Literature DB >> 33074435

CRISPR/Cas9-based precise excision of SlHyPRP1 domain(s) to obtain salt stress-tolerant tomato.

Mil Thi Tran1,2, Duong Thi Hai Doan1, Jihae Kim1, Young Jong Song1, Yeon Woo Sung1, Swati Das1, Eun-Jung Kim1,3, Geon Hui Son1, Sang Hee Kim1, Tien Van Vu4,5, Jae-Yean Kim6,7.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplexed editing of SlHyPRP1 resulted in precise deletions of its functional motif(s), thereby resulting in salt stress-tolerant events in cultivated tomato. Crop genetic improvement to address environmental stresses for sustainable food production has been in high demand, especially given the current situation of global climate changes and reduction of the global food production rate/population rate. Recently, the emerging clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas)-based targeted mutagenesis has provided a revolutionary approach to crop improvement. The major application of CRISPR/Cas in plant genome editing has been the generation of indel mutations via error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair of DNA DSBs. In this study, we examined the power of the CRISPR/Cas9-based novel approach in the precise manipulation of protein domains of tomato hybrid proline-rich protein 1 (HyPRP1), which is a negative regulator of salt stress responses. We revealed that the precise elimination of SlHyPRP1 negative-response domain(s) led to high salinity tolerance at the germination and vegetative stages in our experimental conditions. CRISPR/Cas9-based domain editing may be an efficient tool to engineer multidomain proteins of important food crops to cope with global climate changes for sustainable agriculture and future food security.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; Genome editing; HyPRP1; Multiplexed editing; Precision breeding; Tomato

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074435     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02622-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  25 in total

1.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining.

Authors:  Kishore K Chiruvella; Zhuobin Liang; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining.

Authors:  Anthony J Davis; David J Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A golden gate modular cloning toolbox for plants.

Authors:  Carola Engler; Mark Youles; Ramona Gruetzner; Tim-Martin Ehnert; Stefan Werner; Jonathan D G Jones; Nicola J Patron; Sylvestre Marillonnet
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 7.  Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?

Authors:  Mireille Bétermier; Pascale Bertrand; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases.

Authors:  Sangsu Bae; Jeongbin Park; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  HyPRP1 Gene Suppressed by Multiple Stresses Plays a Negative Role in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Tomato.

Authors:  Jinhua Li; Bo Ouyang; Taotao Wang; Zhidan Luo; Changxian Yang; Hanxia Li; Wei Sima; Junhong Zhang; Zhibiao Ye
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Tao Guo; Yi-Li Feng; Jing-Jing Xiao; Qian Liu; Xiu-Na Sun; Ji-Feng Xiang; Na Kong; Si-Cheng Liu; Guo-Qiao Chen; Yue Wang; Meng-Meng Dong; Zhen Cai; Hui Lin; Xiu-Jun Cai; An-Yong Xie
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Intriguing Role of Proline in Redox Potential Conferring High Temperature Stress Tolerance.

Authors:  P B Kavi Kishor; Prashanth Suravajhala; P Rathnagiri; Nese Sreenivasulu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Abiotic Stresses in Plants and Their Markers: A Practice View of Plant Stress Responses and Programmed Cell Death Mechanisms.

Authors:  Bruno Paes de Melo; Paola de Avelar Carpinetti; Otto Teixeira Fraga; Paolo Lucas Rodrigues-Silva; Vinícius Sartori Fioresi; Luiz Fernando de Camargos; Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 3.  CRISPR/Cas9 Technique for Temperature, Drought, and Salinity Stress Responses.

Authors:  Xiaohan Li; Siyan Xu; Martina Bianca Fuhrmann-Aoyagi; Shaoze Yuan; Takeru Iwama; Misaki Kobayashi; Kenji Miura
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 4.  New approaches to improve crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Miguel González Guzmán; Francesco Cellini; Vasileios Fotopoulos; Raffaella Balestrini; Vicent Arbona
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Genome-editing approaches and applications: a brief review on CRISPR technology and its role in cancer.

Authors:  Narmadhaa Siva; Sonal Gupta; Ayam Gupta; Jayendra Nath Shukla; Babita Malik; Nidhi Shukla
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  CRISPR innovations in plant breeding.

Authors:  Sang-Gyu Kim
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  Conserved Opposite Functions in Plant Resistance to Biotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens of the Immune Regulator SRFR1.

Authors:  Geon Hui Son; Jiyun Moon; Rahul Mahadev Shelake; Uyen Thi Vuong; Robert A Ingle; Walter Gassmann; Jae-Yean Kim; Sang Hee Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Jasmonates and Plant Salt Stress: Molecular Players, Physiological Effects, and Improving Tolerance by Using Genome-Associated Tools.

Authors:  Celia Delgado; Freddy Mora-Poblete; Sunny Ahmar; Jen-Tsung Chen; Carlos R Figueroa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Genetic, Epigenetic, Genomic and Microbial Approaches to Enhance Salt Tolerance of Plants: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Gargi Prasad Saradadevi; Debajit Das; Satendra K Mangrauthia; Sridev Mohapatra; Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah; Manish Roorkiwal; Manish Solanki; Raman Meenakshi Sundaram; Neeraja N Chirravuri; Akshay S Sakhare; Suneetha Kota; Rajeev K Varshney; Gireesha Mohannath
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 10.  CRISPR-Cas9-based genetic engineering for crop improvement under drought stress.

Authors:  Abdul Sami; Zhao Xue; Saheera Tazein; Ayesha Arshad; Zong He Zhu; Ya Ping Chen; Yue Hong; Xiao Tian Zhu; Ke Jin Zhou
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.