Literature DB >> 33071484

Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Cohort Analyses: A Kernel Weighting Approach.

Lingxiao Wang1,2, Barry I Graubard2, Hormuzd A Katki2, Yan Li1.   

Abstract

For various reasons, cohort studies generally forgo probability sampling required to obtain population representative samples. However, such cohorts lack population-representativeness, which invalidates estimates of population prevalences for novel health factors only available in cohorts. To improve external validity of estimates from cohorts, we propose a kernel weighting (KW) approach that uses survey data as a reference to create pseudo-weights for cohorts. A jackknife variance is proposed for the KW estimates. In simulations, the KW method outperformed two existing propensity-score-based weighting methods in mean-squared error while maintaining confidence interval coverage. We applied all methods to estimating US population mortality and prevalences of various diseases from the non-representative US NIH-AARP cohort, using the sample from US-representative National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) as the reference. Assuming that the NHIS estimates are correct, the KW approach yielded generally less biased estimates compared to the existing propensity-score-based weighting methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort studies; Jackknife variance estimation; Taylor series linearization variance; complex survey sample; kernel smoothing; propensity score weighting

Year:  2020        PMID: 33071484      PMCID: PMC7566586          DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc        ISSN: 0964-1998            Impact factor:   2.483


  18 in total

1.  What makes UK Biobank special?

Authors:  Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Statistical aspects of The National Children's Study. Discussion.

Authors:  Roderick J Little
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Variable selection for propensity score models.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  When to promote, and when to avoid, a population perspective.

Authors:  Greg J Duncan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-11

7.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Evidence of a healthy volunteer effect in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  P F Pinsky; A Miller; B S Kramer; T Church; D Reding; P Prorok; E Gelmann; R E Schoen; S Buys; R B Hayes; C D Berg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Kenneth J Rothman; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Multivariate piecewise exponential survival modeling.

Authors:  Yan Li; Orestis A Panagiotou; Amanda Black; Dandan Liao; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nonparametric Mass Imputation for Data Integration.

Authors:  Sixia Chen; Shu Yang; Jae Kwang Kim
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2020-11-17

2.  Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.

Authors:  Yan Li; Katherine E Irimata; Yulei He; Jennifer Parker
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.139

3.  Aspirin, ibuprofen, and reduced risk of advanced colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrence and colorectal cancer in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Kenechukwu Chudy-Onwugaje; Wen-Yi Huang; L Joseph Su; Mark P Purdue; Christine C Johnson; Lingxiao Wang; Hormuzd A Katki; Kathryn Hughes Barry; Sonja I Berndt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.921

4.  Enhancing estimation methods for integrating probability and nonprobability survey samples with machine-learning techniques. An application to a Survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.

Authors:  María Del Mar Rueda; Sara Pasadas-Del-Amo; Beatriz Cobo Rodríguez; Luis Castro-Martín; Ramón Ferri-García
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 1.715

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.