| Literature DB >> 33069240 |
Antonello E Spinelli1, Andrea Bresolin2,3, Stefania Zuppone4, Laura Perani5, Giuseppe Fallara4, Nadia Di Muzio6,7, Riccardo Vago4,7, Claudio Fiorino2, Cesare Cozzarini6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methods for the non-invasive quantification of changes in bladder wall thickness as potential predictors of radiation cystitis in pre-clinical research would be desirable. The use of ultrasound for this aim seems promising, but is still relatively unexplored. A method using ultrasound for bladder wall thickness quantification in rats was developed and applied to measure early radiation-induced bladder wall thickness changes.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Bladder wall thickness; Radiation cystitis; Radiotherapy; Ultrasound imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33069240 PMCID: PMC7568412 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01684-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1a Example of a 3-dimensional ultrasound scan of rat bladder. The light blue segments in the third and fourth quadrants represent the major axes of the ellipsoid. Examples of b bladder wall area on the ventral and dorsal side and c area inside bladder measured along a segment of 4-mm in the central sagittal ultrasound scan (B-mode)
Fig. 2Radiotherapy treatment geometry and, at the top left corner, an example of the dose-volume histogram calculated by a Monte Carlo algorithm for a rat bladder contoured on cone beam CT image
Fig. 3Mean bladder wall thickness of four female non-irradiated Fischer rats against different bladder fillings
Results: the descriptive statistics refer to the mean bladder wall thickness normalized to the baseline value and is expressed in arbitrary units
| Group | Parameters | Day 4 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n = 6 rats) | Mean ± SD | 0.94 ± 0.13 | 0.94 ± 0.10 |
| Median (Min–Max) | 0.9 (0.78–1.11) | 0.93 (0.81–1.10) | |
| 25–30 Gy (n = 9 rats) | Mean ± SD | 1.32 ± 0.41 | 1.30 ± 0.21 |
| Median (Min–Max) | 1.22 (0.82–2.27) | 1.29 (1.00–1.73) | |
| Events above effect size | 2/9 (22%) | 4/9 (44%) | |
| < 0.0001 | |||
| 35–40 Gy (n = 9 rats) | Mean ± SD | 1.47 ± 0.29 | 1.90 ± 0.83 |
| Median (Min–Max) | 1.45 (1.15–1.94) | 1.69 (1.02–3.60) | |
| Events above effect size | 5/9 (56%) | 8/9 (89%) | |
| < 0.0001 | |||
| 0.022 | |||
p values are reported as result of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test between groups
Fig. 4Bladder wall thickness (BWT) normalized to the baseline value based on radiation treatment strength and follow-up timing. The two red bars off the chart correspond to a BWT ratio of 3.60 and 2.78 respectively
Fig. 5a Ultrasound image of a transverse section of a rat bladder using the Doppler mode: red and blue colors evidence the presence of blood vessels which thicken the bladder wall. b Artifacts in the ultrasound image due to air bubbles accidently injected by catheter (on the left) and due to tissue in the superficial layers characterized by high acoustic impedance (on the right)
Fig. 6Bladder wall thickness before 1 day (on the left) and after 4 days (on the right) a single radiation dose of 40 Gy