| Literature DB >> 33069226 |
Supachaya Sriphoosanaphan1,2, Kessarin Thanapirom1,2,3, Sirinporn Suksawatamnuay1,2,3, Panarat Thaimai1, Sukanya Sittisomwong1, Kanokwan Sonsiri1, Nunthiya Srisoonthorn2, Nicha Teeratorn1, Nattaporn Tanpowpong4, Bundit Chaopathomkul4, Sombat Treeprasertsuk1, Yong Poovorawan5, Piyawat Komolmit6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D (VD) is important in hepatic fibrogenesis in animal models and human studies. VD deficiency is associated with liver fibrosis progression. Metabolic dysfunction of the liver, as an intermediate organ for VD metabolism, contributes partly to this deficiency. We hypothesized that improving hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients after eradication with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) would increase 25-hydroxyVD [25(OH)VD] levels.Entities:
Keywords: Amino terminal of type III procollagen peptide; Direct-acting antiviral; Hepatitis C; Liver fibrosis; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33069226 PMCID: PMC7568415 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01485-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study
Baseline characteristics of CHC patients
| Characteristics | Total population (n = 80) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57.7 ± 10.5 |
| Sex: male, n (%) | 42 (52.5) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.4 ± 3.5 |
| Naïve cases, n (%) | 42 (52.5) |
| Cirrhosis, n (%) | 63 (78.8) |
| Child–Pugh class A | 58 (72.5) |
| Child–Pugh class B | 5 (6.3) |
| Liver stiffness (kPa)a | 19.2 ± 15.3 |
| HCV viral load (log IU/mL) | 6.1 ± 0.7 |
| Genotype, n (%) | |
| 1 | 44 (55.0) |
| 3 | 30 (37.5) |
| 6 | 6 (7.5) |
| Alanine aminotransferase level (U/L) | 80.0 ± 53.3 |
| Treatment regimen, n (%)b | |
| SOF/DAC | 22 (27.5) |
| SOF/LED | 8 (10.0) |
| SOF/VEL | 1 (1.25) |
| SOF/DAC/RBV | 42 (52.5) |
| SOF/LED/RBV | 6 (7.5) |
| SOF/VEL/RBV | 1 (1.25) |
| Sustained virological response, n (%) | 80 (100) |
an = 49
bDAC, daclatasvir; LED, ledipasvir; RBV, ribavirin; SOF, sofosbuvir; VEL, velpatasvir
Fig. 2ALT levels in CHC patients at baseline and after DAA curative treatment
Fig. 3LSM in CHC patients at baseline and after DAA curative treatment
Changes in liver stiffness between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients
| Week 0 (kPa) | Week 48 (kPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrhotic (n = 41) | 21.7 ± 15.4 | 13.0 ± 8.2 | < 0.001 |
| Non-cirrhotic (n = 8) | 5.9 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 0.141 |
Fig. 4P3NP levels in CHC patients at baseline and after DAA curative treatment
Fig. 5.25(OH)VD levels in CHC patients at baseline and after DAA curative treatment
Serum 25(OH)VD levels in CHC patients at baseline and after DAA curative treatment comparing cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients
| Week 0 (ng/mL) | Week 24 (ng/mL) | Week 48a (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrhotic (n = 63) | 25.0 ± 10.5 | 20.2 ± 8.1 | 19.9 ± 8.2 |
| Non-cirrhotic (n = 17) | 31.0 ± 10.3 | 22.8 ± 7.7 | 24.1 ± 9.4 |
| 0.039 | 0.251 | 0.087 |
aSix patients were lost to follow-up at 48 weeks; 5 in cirrhotic group and 1 in non-cirrhotic group
Fig. 6Serum 25(OH)VD level distribution in CHC patients at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks
Comparison of laboratory data between CHC patients with and without advanced liver fibrosis
| Liver stiffness measurement | < F3 (n = 15) | ≥ F3 (n = 34) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALT levels (U/L) | |||
| Week 0 | 56.7 ± 48.0 | 97.3 ± 60.9 | 0.027 |
| Week 24 | 15.4 ± 9.0 | 32.3 ± 21.9 | 0.006 |
| Week 48 | 14.3 ± 6.1 | 24.5 ± 10.0 | 0.001 |
| P3NP levels (ng/mL) | |||
| Week 0 | 35.8 ± 12.1 | 49.0 ± 14.6 | 0.004 |
| Week 24 | 29.4 ± 13.4 | 38.7 ± 18.5 | 0.088 |
| Week 48 | 25.9 ± 5.9 | 39.3 ± 14.7 | 0.002 |
| 25(OH)VD levels (ng/mL) | |||
| Week 0 | 26.8 ± 9.1 | 21.9 ± 6.4 | 0.036 |
| Week 24 | 19.2 ± 6.7 | 19.7 ± 5.2 | 0.816 |
| Week 48 | 22.3 ± 8.0 | 19.4 ± 6.5 | 0.206 |