| Literature DB >> 22074319 |
La-or Chailurkit1, Wichai Aekplakorn, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency is highly prevalent. Most of the studies concerning vitamin D status were generated from countries situated at temperate latitudes. It is less clear what the extent of vitamin D insufficiency is in countries situated in the tropics and how geographical regions within country would affect vitamin D status. In the present study, we investigated vitamin D status in Thais according to geographical regions and other risk factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22074319 PMCID: PMC3247919 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Geographical regions of the study.
Baseline characteristics of the population studies
| Characteristics | Men | Women | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 39.6 ± 0.5 | 41.0 ± 0.4 | 40.3 ± 0.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 0.2 | 24.4 ± 0.2* | 23.6 ± 0.1 |
| rural | 71.5% | 70.2% | 70.8% |
| urban | 28.5% | 29.8% | 29.2% |
| Religion: | |||
| Muslim | 2.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% |
| non Muslim | 97.5% | 96.1% | 96.8% |
| Region: | |||
| Bangkok | 8.8% | 9.4% | 9.1% |
| Central | 24.4% | 24.9% | 24.6% |
| North | 18.3% | 18.4% | 18.3% |
| Northeast | 34.9% | 33.5% | 34.2% |
| South | 13.6% | 13.8% | 13.7% |
Values are mean ± SE or percentage
* Significantly different from the men (p < 0.001)
Figure 2Frequency distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in Thais.
Duration of sunshine and mean serum vitamin D levels according to geographical region and gender
| Regions | Duration of sunshine (hours/day) | 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Total | ||
| Bangkok | 4.7 - 9.1 | 69.0 ± 0.6 | 61.1 ± 1.3* | 64.8 ± 0.7*** |
| Central | 4.1 -8.5 | 86.5 ± 1.7** | 73.0 ± 1.1*, **, *** | 79.5 ± 1.1**, *** |
| North | 3.6 - 8.1 | 88.5 ± 1.7** | 75.1 ± 1.8*, ** | 81.7 ± 1.2** |
| Northeast | 3.5 -8.0 | 87.8 ± 1.3** | 82.2 ± 0.8** | |
| South | 2.0 - 8.8 | 87.7 ± 2.9** | 69.5 ± 0.8*, **, *** | 78.3 ± 1.3**, *** |
| Total | 2.0 - 9.1 | 85.9 ± 1.1 | 73.0 ± 0.8* | 79.3 ± 0.8 |
Values are range or mean ± SE
*Significantly different from men (p < 0.001), ** significantly different from Bangkok (p < 0.001), *** significantly different from Northeast (p < 0.05)
Figure 3Vitamin D status inside (closed circle) and outside (open circle) the municipal area in each region. Values are mean ± SE. * = significant compared to outside the municipal area within region
Mean serum 25(OH)D levels between gender by age, municipal area, BMI and religion
| Variables | 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Total | |||
| Age (years) | 15 - 29 | 79.3 ± 1.3 | 69.3 ± 1.1 | <0.001 | 74.4 ± 0.9 |
| 30 - 44 | 89.1 ± 1.7* | 70.7 ± 1.2 a | <0.001 | 79.9 ± 1.1*,, a | |
| 45 - 59 | 86.5 ± 1.5*, | 75.3 ± 1.2*, | <0.001 | 80.6 ± 1.0* | |
| 60 - 69 | 90.7 ± 1.3* | 80.2 ± 1.1* | <0.001 | 85.1 ± 1.0* | |
| 70 - 79 | 95.0 ± 1.4* | 83.8 ± 1.7* | <0.001 | 88.6 ± 1.2* a | |
| > 80 | 96.9 ± 1.5* | 80.7 ± 1.7* | <0.001 | 88.2 ± 1.4* a | |
| Municipal area | rural | 88.9 ± 1.1 | 75.8 ± 0.8 | <0.001 | 82.3 ± 0.6 |
| urban | 78.4 ± 1.6** | 66.6 ± 1.1** | <0.001 | 72.3 ± 1.3** | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ≥ 25 | 84.1 ± 1.9 | 73.7 ± 1.1 | <0.001 | 77.5 ± 1.1 |
| < 25 | 86.5 ± 1.1 | 72.6 ± 0.9 | <0.001 | 80.3 ± 0.8*** | |
| Religion | Muslim | 81.9 ± 5.2 | 61.1 ± 4.2 | = 0.001 | 69.0 ± 4.4 |
| non Muslim | 86.0 ± 10**** | 73.5 ± 0.7**** | <0.001 | 79.7 ± 0.7**** | |
*Significantly different from age 15 -29 years (p < 0.001), **significantly different from rural (p < 0.001), *** significantly different from BMI ≥ 25 (p < 0.001), **** significantly different from Muslim (p < 0.05) asignificantly different from age > 80 years
Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency by geographical region and gender
| Regions | Age, yrs (range) | Serum 25(OH)D levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 75 nmol/L | < 50 nmol/L | ||||||
| Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | ||
| Bangkok | 15 - 93 | 66.7% | 75.5% | 64.6% | 10.8% | 24.2% | 14.3% |
| Central | 15 - 91 | 36.2% | 59.2% | 43.1% | 2.1% | 11.4% | 6.5% |
| North | 15 - 98 | 27.9% | 50.8% | 39.1% | 0.9% | 6.5% | 4.3% |
| Northeast | 15 - 91 | 25.1% | 51.0% | 34.2% | 0.1% | 3.7% | 2.8% |
| South | 15 - 92 | 29.4% | 65.8% | 43.8% | 1.5% | 12.9% | 6.3% |
| Total | 15 - 98 | 32.6% | 57.3% | 45.2% | 1.9% | 9.3% | 5.7% |
Independent variables for serum 25(OH)D levels by multiple regression analysis
| Independent variables | Regression coefficient | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gender | 12.97 | 0.957 | < 0.001 |
| Age | 0.28 | 0.019 | < 0.001 |
| Urban | -6.47 | 1.04 | < 0.001 |
| BMI | -0.08 | 0.094 | 0.422 |
| Muslim | -0.82 | 2.358 | 0.733 |
| Regiona: | |||
| Bangkok | -12.01 | 1.519 | <0.001 |
| Central | -1.73 | 1.543 | 0.279 |
| North | -0.69 | 1.575 | 0.664 |
| South | -3.32 | 1.648 | 0.060 |
areference group: Northeast