Akos Varga-Szemes1, Megha Penmetsa1, Tilman Emrich1,2,3, Thomas M Todoran4, Pal Suranyi1, Stephen R Fuller1, Robert R Edelman5,6, Ioannis Koktzoglou5,7, U Joseph Schoepf8. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. 3. German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, NorthShore University, Evanston, IL, USA. 6. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 7. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 8. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. schoepf@musc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The proton density-weighted, in-phase stack-of-stars (PDIP-SOS) MRI technique provides calcification visualization in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a combined non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA and PDIP-SOS MRI protocol for the detection of PAD, in comparison with CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: Twenty-six prospectively enrolled PAD patients (70 ± 8 years) underwent lower extremity CTA and 1.5-T or 3-T PDIP-SOS/QISS MRI prior to DSA. Two readers rated image quality and graded stenosis (≥ 50%) on QISS MRA without/with calcification visualization. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated against DSA. Calcification was quantified and compared between MRI and non-contrast CT (NCCT) using paired t test, Pearson's correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Image quality ratings were significantly higher for CTA compared to those for MRA (4.0 [3.0-4.0] and 3.0 [3.0-4.0]; p = 0.0369). The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MRA, QISS MRA with PDIP-SOS, and CTA for ≥ 50% stenosis detection were 85.4%, 92.2%, and 90.2%, and 90.3%, 93.2%, and 94.2%, respectively, while AUCs were 0.879, 0.928, and 0.923, respectively. A significant increase in AUC was observed when PDIP-SOS was added to the MRA protocol (p = 0.0266). Quantification of calcification showed significant differences between PDIP-SOS and NCCT (80.6 ± 31.2 mm3 vs. 88.0 ± 29.8 mm3; p = 0.0002) with high correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and moderate mean of differences (- 7.4 mm3). CONCLUSION: QISS MRA combined with PDIP-SOS MRI provides improved, CTA equivalent, accuracy for the detection of PAD, although its image quality remains inferior to CTA. KEY POINTS: • Agreement in stenosis detection rate using non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA compared to DSA improved when calcification visualization was provided to the readers. • An increase was observed in both sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ≥ 50% stenosis when MRI-based calcification assessment was added to the protocol, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy more comparable to CTA. • Quantification of calcification showed statistical difference between MRI and non-contrast CT; however, a high correlation was observed between the techniques.
OBJECTIVES: The proton density-weighted, in-phase stack-of-stars (PDIP-SOS) MRI technique provides calcification visualization in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a combined non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA and PDIP-SOS MRI protocol for the detection of PAD, in comparison with CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: Twenty-six prospectively enrolled PAD patients (70 ± 8 years) underwent lower extremity CTA and 1.5-T or 3-T PDIP-SOS/QISS MRI prior to DSA. Two readers rated image quality and graded stenosis (≥ 50%) on QISS MRA without/with calcification visualization. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated against DSA. Calcification was quantified and compared between MRI and non-contrast CT (NCCT) using paired t test, Pearson's correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Image quality ratings were significantly higher for CTA compared to those for MRA (4.0 [3.0-4.0] and 3.0 [3.0-4.0]; p = 0.0369). The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MRA, QISS MRA with PDIP-SOS, and CTA for ≥ 50% stenosis detection were 85.4%, 92.2%, and 90.2%, and 90.3%, 93.2%, and 94.2%, respectively, while AUCs were 0.879, 0.928, and 0.923, respectively. A significant increase in AUC was observed when PDIP-SOS was added to the MRA protocol (p = 0.0266). Quantification of calcification showed significant differences between PDIP-SOS and NCCT (80.6 ± 31.2 mm3 vs. 88.0 ± 29.8 mm3; p = 0.0002) with high correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and moderate mean of differences (- 7.4 mm3). CONCLUSION: QISS MRA combined with PDIP-SOS MRI provides improved, CTA equivalent, accuracy for the detection of PAD, although its image quality remains inferior to CTA. KEY POINTS: • Agreement in stenosis detection rate using non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA compared to DSA improved when calcification visualization was provided to the readers. • An increase was observed in both sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ≥ 50% stenosis when MRI-based calcification assessment was added to the protocol, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy more comparable to CTA. • Quantification of calcification showed statistical difference between MRI and non-contrast CT; however, a high correlation was observed between the techniques.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomography angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral artery disease; Vascular calcification
Authors: Salvador Tranche-Iparraguirre; Rafael Marín-Iranzo; Rebeca Fernández-de Sanmamed; Alba Riesgo-García; Eduardo Hevia-Rodríguez; Juan B García-Casas Journal: Nefrologia Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 2.033
Authors: Akos Varga-Szemes; Pascale Aouad; U Joseph Schoepf; Tilman Emrich; Basel Yacoub; Thomas M Todoran; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Robert R Edelman Journal: MAGMA Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 2.310