| Literature DB >> 33068053 |
Cheng Cui1, Jie En Valerie Sia1,2, Siqi Tu1,3, Xiaobei Li1,3, Zhongqi Dong4, Zhiheng Yu1, Xueting Yao1, Oliver Hatley5, Haiyan Li1,6, Dongyang Liu1.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aims to develop and verify a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) population model for the Chinese geriatric population in Simcyp.Entities:
Keywords: CYP1A2; CYP3A4; Chinese Geriatric Population; PBPK; Renal Excretion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33068053 PMCID: PMC8359847 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 0306-5251 Impact factor: 4.335
FIGURE 1Overall workflow of the Chinese geriatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) population model development and verification
Summary of physiological data collected from Chinese geriatric population
| Parameters | Age (65–75 years old) | Age (>75 years old) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males ( | Females ( | Total ( | Males ( | Females ( | Total ( | |
| Height (cm) | 163.83 ± 6.29 (2552) | 152.13 ± 5.74 (3061) | 157.45 ± 8.36 (5613) | 162.24 ± 6.01 (786) | 149.40 ± 6.04 (678) | 156.29 ± 8.79 (1464) |
| Weight (kg) | 65.35 ± 10.50 (2573) | 57.95 ± 9.70 (3065) | 61.32 ± 10.73 (5638) | 61.97 ± 10.58 (793) | 53.68 ± 9.89 (682) | 58.14 ± 11.07 (1475) |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 24.32 ± 3.34 (2550) | 24.99 ± 3.68 (3057) | 24.68 ± 3.55 (5607) | 23.51 ± 3.49 (785) | 23.95 ± 3.81 (676) | 23.72 ± 3.65 (1461) |
| Cardiac output (L min−1) | 5.14 ± 1.4 (940) | 4.14 ± 1.26 (849) | 4.67 ± 1.43 (1789) | 4.77 ± 1.28 (258) | 3.98 ± 1.74 (180) | 4.45 ± 1.54 (438) |
| Serum creatinine (μmol L−1) | 83.14 ± 16.22 (1111) | 67.68 ± 20.41 (1056) | 75.61 ± 19.94 (2167) | 93.48 ± 39.6 (323) | 72.02 ± 18.72 (225) | 84.67 ± 34.35 (548) |
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |
| Liver weight (g) | 1225.8 ± 255.1 | 1230.7 ± 243.1 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Kidney weight (g) | 269.9 ± 61.7 | 250.4 ± 52.9 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
NA, not applicable
Data presented in mean ± SD (n)
The recalibrated equations used in Chinese geriatric population model
| Type | Parameters | Recalibrated equations |
|---|---|---|
| Demographic | Age distribution | Weibull |
| Age‐height relationship | ||
| Body surface area | ||
| Cardiac | Cardiac output | |
| Kidney | Serum creatinine (μmol/L) | For male aged 65–75, 83.14 ± 15.89; >75, 93.48 ± 39.6, for female aged 65–75, 67.68 ± 30.16; >75, 72.02 ± 25.99 |
| GFR cap | 15–400 mL/min/1.73cm2 |
Simulated and observed physiological parameters in Chinese geriatric population
| Parameters | Age (65–75 years old) | Age (>75 years old) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% percentile | 95% percentile | Mean | 5% percentile | 95% percentile | Mean | ||
| Height (cm) | Observed | 144.8 | 171.2 | 157.5 | 142.0 | 170.0 | 156.3 |
| Predicted | 144.4 | 172.7 | 158.6 | 141.1 | 170.3 | 155.6 | |
| Weight (kg) | Observed | 44.5 | 80.0 | 61.3 | 42.0 | 77.9 | 58.1 |
| Predicted | 47.2 | 88.5 | 66.6 | 45.8 | 86.1 | 64.8 | |
| Cardiac output (L min−1) | Observed | 175.2 | 412.8 | 280.2 | 166.2 | 400.8 | 267.0 |
| Predicted | 236.4 | 332.4 | 283.8 | 221.8 | 316.0 | 268.3 | |
| Serum creatinine (μmol L−1) | Observed | 50.0 | 105.0 | 75.6 | 53.0 | 125.6 | 84.7 |
| Predicted | 49.6 | 105.8 | 76.1 | 46.5 | 142.6 | 85.1 | |
| Male | Female | Male | Female | ||||
| Observed | 1225.8 ± 255.1 | 1230.7 ± 243.1 | NA | NA | |||
| Predicted | 1173.4 ± 190.9 | 1051.1 ± 178.7 | NA | NA | |||
| Observed | 269.9 ± 61.7 | 250.4 ± 52.9 | NA | NA | |||
| Predicted | 287.4 ± 72.5 | 243.4 ± 62.7 | NA | NA | |||
NA, not applicable
Liver weight and kidney weight were presented in mean ± SD.
FIGURE 2(A) Simulated area under curve (AUC) in (i) Chinese adults, (ii) Caucasian adults, and (iii) Caucasian elderly subjects. Solid black line represents the identity line. (B) Simulated maximum plasma concentration (C max) in (i) Chinese adults, (ii) Caucasian adults, and (iii) Caucasian elderly subjects. Solid black line represents the identity line. (C) Simulated clearance (CL) in (i) Chinese adults, (ii) Caucasian adults, and (iii) Caucasian elderly subjects. Solid black line represents the identity line
FIGURE 3Simulated and observed plasma concentration–time profiles in Chinese geriatric population for (A) midazolam, (B) theophylline, (C) ceftazidime, (D) gentamicin and (E) vancomycin
Summary of predicted and observed PK parameters in Chinese geriatric population
| Population | Age (yrs) | Sample size | Dosing route | AUC | CL | Cmax
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Obs | Ratio | Pre | Obs | Ratio | Pre | Obs | Ratio | |||||
| Simvastatin | Chinese | 60–91 | 30 | 20 mg, Oral | 13.06 | 17.21 | 0.76 | 16.24 | 19.80 | 0.82 | 4.00 | NA | NA |
| Midazolam | Chinese | 67–74 | 10 | 15 mg, Oral | 346.13 | 228.95 | 1.51 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 0.90 | 107.04 | 97.95 | 1.09 |
| 76–80 | 10 | 15 mg, Oral | 394.55 | 254.00 | 1.55 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 116.53 | 96.80 | 1.20 | ||
| Theophylline | Chinese | 62–93 | 6 | 157.8 mg, Oral | 128.10 | 103.00 | 1.24 | 24.58 | 36.50 | 0.67 | 19.87 | 16.12 | 1.23 |
| 60–70 | 10 | 200 mg, IV inf | 154.67 | 167.80 | 0.92 | 23.55 | 35.30 | 0.67 | 15.45 | NA | NA | ||
| Ceftazidime | Chinese | 65–75 | 10 | 1000 mg, IV Inf | 238.96 | 244.30 | 0.98 | 62.81 | 58.24 | 1.08 | 85.69 | 101.40 | 0.85 |
| 68–73 | 5 | 1000 mg, IV Inf | 227.76 | 234.25 | 0.97 | 61.32 | 58.20 | 1.05 | 85.72 | NA | NA | ||
| 63–71 | 10 | 1000 mg, IV Inf | 214.06 | 264.84 | 0.81 | 65.84 | 60.61 | 1.09 | 84.95 | 101.36 | 0.84 | ||
| 60–73 | 30 | 1000 mg, IV Inf | 239.50 | NA | NA | 62.81 | NA | NA | 84.34 | 79.25 | 1.06 | ||
| Gentamicin | Chinese | 62–73 | 10 | 120 mg, IV inf | 30.09 | 31.00 | 0.97 | 56.47 | 41.56 | 1.36 | 7.70 | 11.52 | 0.67 |
| Vancomycin | Chinese | 68–72 | 10 | 1000 mg, IV inf | 276.31 | 280.30 | 0.99 | 52.38 | 55.50 | 0.94 | 34.13 | 43.55 | 0.78 |
NA, not applicable; AUC, area under the curve; CL clearance; Pre, predicted; Obs, observed; IV, intravenous; inf, infusion; Ratio was calculated by Pre/Obs.
The unit for AUC and C max of midazolam and simvastatin are h·μg L−1 and μg L−1. For theophylline, the unit is in h·mg L−1 and mg L−1.
The unit for CL of simvastatin and midazolam are L h−1 kg−1. For theophylline, ceftazidime, gentamicin and vancomycin, the unit is in mL h−1 kg−1.
FIGURE 4Comparison of prediction performance of different population models