| Literature DB >> 33067644 |
A Di Francesco1,2, J Zajc3,4, N Gunde-Cimerman4, E Aprea5,6, F Gasperi5,6, N Placì7, F Caruso7, E Baraldi8,7.
Abstract
Aureobasidium strains isolated from diverse unconventional environments belonging to the species A. pullulans, A. melanogenum, and A. subglaciale were evaluated for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) production as a part of their modes of action against Botrytis cinerea of tomato and table grape. By in vitro assay, VOCs generated by the antagonists belonging to the species A. subglaciale showed the highest inhibition percentage of the pathogen mycelial growth (65.4%). In vivo tests were conducted with tomatoes and grapes artificially inoculated with B. cinerea conidial suspension, and exposed to VOCs emitted by the most efficient antagonists of each species (AP1, AM10, AS14) showing that VOCs of AP1 (A. pullulans) reduced the incidence by 67%, partially confirmed by the in vitro results. Conversely, on table grape, VOCs produced by all the strains did not control the fungal incidence but were only reducing the infection severity (< 44.4% by A. pullulans; < 30.5% by A. melanogenum, and A. subglaciale). Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and subsequent gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry identified ethanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol as the most produced VOCs. However, there were differences in the amounts of produced VOCs as well as in their repertoire. The EC50 values of VOCs for reduction of mycelial growth of B. cinerea uncovered 3-methyl-1-butanol as the most effective compound. The study demonstrated that the production and the efficacy of VOCs by Aureobasidium could be directly related to the specific species and pathosystem and uncovers new possibilities for searching more efficient VOCs producing strains in unconventional habitats other than plants.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiosis; Botrytis cinerea; Postharvest; VOCs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33067644 PMCID: PMC7567711 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-020-02947-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0959-3993 Impact factor: 3.312
List of strains used in this study
| Species | Culture collection strain number | Present study number | Isolation habitat | Sampling site location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXF-6519 | AP1 | Felt of a metal roof tile | Slovenia (Mengeš) | |
| EXF-10507 | AP2 | Marble block surface | Italy (Messina) | |
| EXF-10629 | AP3 | Car petrol reservoir | Slovenia (Jezero) | |
| EXF-10650 | AP4 | Acrylic painting | Slovenia (Solkan) | |
| EXF-10751 | AP5 | Cloud water | France | |
| EXF-3378/CBS 110374 | AM6 | Public fountain | Thailand | |
| EXF-3397 | AM7 | Endoperitoneal fluid | Greece | |
| EXF-8016 | AM8 | Bathroom, between faucet and sink | nd | |
| EXF-8429 | AM9 | Tap water | Slovenia | |
| EXF-11028 | AM10 | Proteus anguinus aquarium water | Slovenia, Ljubljana | |
| EXF-2481/CBS 123387 | AS11 | Subglacial ice | Arctic; Svalbard, Ny Alesund | |
| EXF-4632 | AS12 | From decaying leaves of | Slovenia | |
| EXF-2425 | AS13 | Subglacial ice | Arctic; Svalbard, Ny Alesund | |
| EXF-2428 | AS14 | Subglacial ice | Arctic; Svalbard, Ny Alesund | |
| EXF-2450 | AS15 | Glacial ice | Arctic; Svalbard, Ny Alesund |
Analyses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Aureobasidium spp. with HS-SMPE and GC–MS
| Compound | RT | Absolute areas (AA). | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethyl acetate | 2.51 | 1.10E+06a | 1.85E+06b | 4.65E+06c |
| Ethanol | 3.20 | 5.39E+08c | 4.22E+08b | 3.18E+08a |
| 2-Methyl-1-propanol | 7.33 | 1.66E+07b | 1.93E+07c | 1.18E+07a |
| Isoamyl acetate | 8.13 | 8.53E+04a | 1.53E+05b | 9.59E+04a |
| 3-Methyl-1-butanol | 10.74 | 5.76E+07b | 7.52E+07c | 3.66E+07a |
| 2-Methyl-2-butenol | 14.05 | 1.07E+05b | 4.87E+04a | 2.00E+05c |
| Methyl benzoate | 21.86 | 2.79E+04b | 8.26E+03a | 2.69E+04b |
| Butyrolactone | 21.97 | 3.96E+04c | 0.00E+00a | 3.21E+04b |
| 3-Ethylbenzaldehyde | 23.85 | 1.32E+03c | 0.00E+00a | 7.66E+02b |
| γ-Cadinene | 24.93 | 1.98E+02c | 0.00E+00a | 1.00E+02b |
| α-Phenylethanol | 26.16 | 3.58E+03a | 7.34E+03c | 4.50E+03b |
| p-Acetylethylbenzene | 26.55 | 1.21E+03c | 3.51E+02b | 0.00E+00a |
| (Z)-Cinnamaldehyde | 26.60 | 1.36E+02a | 3.74E+02b | 4.63E+02c |
| Ethyl tetradecanoate | 30.96 | 4.27E+04c | 8.66E+03a | 1.56E+04b |
DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber was used. The values represent the average of the same compound produced by 5 strains (each analysed by four vials) that belong to the same species (A. pullulans, A. melanogenum, A. subglaciale). Different letters represent significant differences among the species for each compound according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05)
Fig. 1Principal Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) produced by Aureobasidium spp. strains AP1 (A. pullulans), AM10 (A. melanogenum), AS14 (A. subglaciale) and detected with HS-SMPE and GC–MS gas phase. DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber was used. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of four replicates for each strain. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05)
Fig. 2Effect of volatile compounds produced by Aureobasidium strains belonging to A. pullulans, A. melanogenum, and A. subglaciale species on the mycelial growth (mm) of Botrytis cinerea. Colony diameter (mm) was measured after 5 days at 25 °C. Each value is the mean of 10 plates (replicates) ± standard deviation. Different letters represent significant differences among the strains according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05)
Fig. 3In vivo antagonistic effect of VOCs produced by Aureobasidium strains on Botrytis cinerea in tomato (a) (disease incidence— %) and table grape (b) (disease severity, indicated as the average of two diameter measurements—mm). Fruits were artificially inoculated with B. cinerea conidial suspension (105 conidia mL−1) and incubated for 5 days at 20 °C and 85% RH. Control consisted of NYDA without yeast inoculation. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of two replicates of 20 fruit each for tomato and grape, respectively. Different letters represent significant differences among the yeasts VOCs treatments according to Tukey’s HSD Test (α = 0.05)
Fig. 4Effect of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by AP1, AM10, AS14 strains, respectively A. pullulans, A. melanogenum, and A. subglaciale, on table grape artificially inoculated with Botrytis cinerea conidial suspension
EC50 values (mL L−1) of synthetic volatile compounds mainly produced by Aureobasidium spp. strains evaluated on mycelial growth (Ø, mm) of Botrytis cinerea (Bc1)
| EC50 values (mL L − 1) | |
|---|---|
| Ethanol | 0.51 |
| 3-Methyl 1 butanol | 0.09 |
| 2 Methyl 1 propanol | 0.20 |
The mycelial growth measurements were carried out after 5 days of incubation at 25 °C