| Literature DB >> 33067293 |
Thach Tran1, Huong Thanh Nguyen2, Ian Shochet3, Astrid Wurfl3, Jayne Orr3, Nga Nguyen2, Nga La2, Hau Nguyen1, Ruby Stocker1, Trang Nguyen1, Minh Le1, Jane Fisher4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Resourceful Adolescent Program (RAP) is an evidence-based resilience intervention for adolescents. Operating in a strength-focused paradigm, the programme uses an integration of cognitive behavioural therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy to improve coping skills and build resilience. This study aims to establish whether a culturally and linguistically adapted intervention informed by RAP principles is effective in increasing resilience, enhancing coping skills and preventing symptoms of depression and anxiety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will translate, back-translate and culturally adapt the RAP for adolescents and training materials for facilitators, and the adapted intervention will be called Happy House. A two-arm parallel controlled trial will be conducted in eight high schools in the north of Vietnam. In each of the selected schools, all students from four randomly selected grade 10 classes (an estimation of about 1204 students) will be invited to participate. The control group will receive the usual curriculum. The intervention group will receive six weekly 90 min school-based group sessions of Happy House in addition to the usual curriculum. The primary outcome, depressive symptoms, will be measured using a locally validated version of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised. Secondary outcomes are mental well-being, coping self-efficacy, school connectedness, anger management and health risk behaviours. Data will be collected at recruitment, and at two weeks and six months post intervention. Mixed-effect logistic regression for the main outcome and mixed-effect linear and logistic regression models for the secondary outcomes will be conducted to estimate the effects of the intervention on the outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 21455) and the Institutional Review Board of the Hanoi School of Public Health (488/2019/YTCC-HD3). Dissemination of findings will include peer-reviewed publications, international and national conferences, seminar and media presentations, national policy briefings in Vietnam, local language reports and lay language summaries for participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: ACTRN12620000088943 (3/2/2020).WHO Universal Trial Number: U1111-1246-4079. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: child & adolescent psychiatry; mental health; public health
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33067293 PMCID: PMC7574926 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Data sources for assessment of outcomes
| Variable | Measurement | Description |
| Primary outcome | ||
| Depression | Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised | 20-item scale, assessing depressive symptoms. Has been validated for use among adolescents in Vietnam. |
| Secondary Outcomes | ||
| Mental well-being | Mental Health Continuum Short Form | 14-item scale representing three dimensions of well-being: emotional, social and psychological well-being. |
| Coping self-efficacy | Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSF) | The CSF consists of 26 items measuring perceived self-efficacy for coping with challenges and threats. |
| School connectedness | School connectedness scale developed by The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health | This scale measures the bond adolescents’ feel toward school through the responses to five statements: ‘I feel close to people at this school’, ‘I feel like I am part of this school’, ‘I am happy to be at this school’, ‘The teachers at this school treat students fairly’ and ‘I feel safe in my school’. |
| Anger management | Behavioral Anger Response Questionnaire (BARQ) | The 37-item BARQ measures six factors: direct anger-out, assertion, support seeking, diffusion, avoidance and rumination. |
| Health risk behaviours | 14 questions selected from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey | Health behaviours are assessed including cigarette smoking, alcohol use, physical fighting, watching TV, playing video games and using a computer. |
Participant timeline
| Timepoint | Study period | |||||
| Enrolment of participants | Baseline survey | Allocation of clusters | Post allocation | |||
| −2 weeks | −1 week | 0 | 6 weeks | 8 weeks | 30 weeks | |
| Enrolment | ||||||
| Eligibility screen | X | |||||
| Informed consent | X | |||||
| Allocation | X | |||||
| Interventions | ||||||
| Happy House | ||||||
| Control | ||||||
| Assessments | ||||||
| Baseline characteristics | ||||||
| Sociodemographic characteristics | X | |||||
| Physical health | X | |||||
| Burden of academic activities | X | |||||
| Outcomes | ||||||
| Depression | X | X | X | |||
| Mental well-being | X | X | X | |||
| Coping self-efficacy | X | X | X | |||
| School connectedness | X | X | X | |||
| Anger management | X | X | X | |||
| Health risk behaviours | X | X | X | |||