Ritaban Dutta1, Gary Delaney1, Barbara Toson2, Amy S Jordan3,4, David P White5, Andrew Wellman5, Danny J Eckert2,6,7. 1. Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia. 2. College of Medicine & Public Health and. 3. Melbourne School of Physiological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. 5. Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 6. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia. 7. Neuroscience Research Australia and the School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
Rationale: There are at least four key pathophysiological endotypes that contribute to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathophysiology. These include 1) upper-airway collapsibility (Pcrit); 2) arousal threshold; 3) loop gain; and 4) pharyngeal muscle responsiveness. However, an easily interpretable model to examine the different ways and the extent to which these OSA endotypes contribute to conventional polysomnography-defined OSA severity (i.e., the apnea-hypopnea index) has not been investigated. In addition, clinically deployable approaches to estimate OSA endotypes to advance knowledge on OSA pathogenesis and targeted therapy at scale are not currently available. Objectives: Develop an interpretable data-driven model to 1) determine the different ways and the extent to which the four key OSA endotypes contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity and 2) gain insight into how standard polysomnographic and clinical variables contribute to OSA endotypes and whether they can be used to predict OSA endotypes. Methods: Age, body mass index, and eight polysomnography parameters from a standard diagnostic study were collected. OSA endotypes were also quantified in 52 participants (43 participants with OSA and nine control subjects) using gold-standard physiologic methodology on a separate night. Unsupervised multivariate principal component analyses and data-driven supervised machine learning (decision tree learner) were used to develop a predictive algorithm to address the study objectives. Results: Maximum predictive performance accuracy of the trained model to identify standard polysomnography-defined OSA severity levels (no OSA, mild to moderate, or severe) using the using the four OSA endotypes was approximately twice that of chance. Similarly, performance accuracy to predict OSA endotype categories ("good," "moderate," or "bad") from standard polysomnographic and clinical variables was approximately twice that of chance for Pcrit and slightly lower for arousal threshold.Conclusions: This novel approach provides new insights into the different ways in which OSA endotypes can contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity. Although further validation work is required, these findings also highlight the potential for routine sleep study and clinical data to estimate at least two of the key OSA endotypes using data-driven predictive analysis methodology as part of a clinical decision support system to inform scalable research studies to advance OSA pathophysiology and targeted therapy for OSA.
Rationale: There are at least four key pathophysiological endotypes that contribute to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathophysiology. These include 1) upper-airway collapsibility (Pcrit); 2) arousal threshold; 3) loop gain; and 4) pharyngeal muscle responsiveness. However, an easily interpretable model to examine the different ways and the extent to which these OSA endotypes contribute to conventional polysomnography-defined OSA severity (i.e., the apnea-hypopnea index) has not been investigated. In addition, clinically deployable approaches to estimate OSA endotypes to advance knowledge on OSA pathogenesis and targeted therapy at scale are not currently available. Objectives: Develop an interpretable data-driven model to 1) determine the different ways and the extent to which the four key OSA endotypes contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity and 2) gain insight into how standard polysomnographic and clinical variables contribute to OSA endotypes and whether they can be used to predict OSA endotypes. Methods: Age, body mass index, and eight polysomnography parameters from a standard diagnostic study were collected. OSA endotypes were also quantified in 52 participants (43 participants with OSA and nine control subjects) using gold-standard physiologic methodology on a separate night. Unsupervised multivariate principal component analyses and data-driven supervised machine learning (decision tree learner) were used to develop a predictive algorithm to address the study objectives. Results: Maximum predictive performance accuracy of the trained model to identify standard polysomnography-defined OSA severity levels (no OSA, mild to moderate, or severe) using the using the four OSA endotypes was approximately twice that of chance. Similarly, performance accuracy to predict OSA endotype categories ("good," "moderate," or "bad") from standard polysomnographic and clinical variables was approximately twice that of chance for Pcrit and slightly lower for arousal threshold.Conclusions: This novel approach provides new insights into the different ways in which OSA endotypes can contribute to polysomnography-defined OSA severity. Although further validation work is required, these findings also highlight the potential for routine sleep study and clinical data to estimate at least two of the key OSA endotypes using data-driven predictive analysis methodology as part of a clinical decision support system to inform scalable research studies to advance OSA pathophysiology and targeted therapy for OSA.
Authors: Andrew Wellman; Atul Malhotra; Amy S Jordan; Karen Schory; Shiva Gautam; David P White Journal: J Physiol Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; Robert L Owens; Danny J Eckert; Shane Landry; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Luke D J Thomson; Shane A Landry; Rebecca Singleton; Ai-Ming Wong; Simon A Joosten; Caroline J Beatty; Danny J Eckert; Atul Malhotra; Garun S Hamilton; Bradley A Edwards Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrew Wellman; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Robert B Fogel; Eliot S Katz; Karen Schory; Jill K Edwards; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniel J Levendowski; Nadene Zack; Srini Rao; Keith Wong; Michael Gendreau; Jay Kranzler; Timothy Zavora; Philip R Westbrook Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Jason P Kirkness; Alan R Schwartz; Hartmut Schneider; Naresh M Punjabi; Joseph J Maly; Alison M Laffan; Brian M McGinley; Thomas Magnuson; Michael Schweitzer; Philip L Smith; Susheel P Patil Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2008-04-17
Authors: Amal M Osman; Benjamin K Tong; Shane A Landry; Bradley A Edwards; Simon A Joosten; Garun S Hamilton; Jennifer M Cori; Amy S Jordan; David Stevens; Ronald R Grunstein; R Doug McEvoy; Peter G Catcheside; Danny J Eckert Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Christopher N Schmickl; Jeremy E Orr; Paul Kim; Brandon Nokes; Scott Sands; Sreeganesh Manoharan; Lana McGinnis; Gabriela Parra; Pamela DeYoung; Robert L Owens; Atul Malhotra Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Winfried Randerath; Jan de Lange; Jan Hedner; Jean Pierre T F Ho; Marie Marklund; Sofia Schiza; Jörg Steier; Johan Verbraecken Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-06-27