Literature DB >> 32267509

An assessment of a simple clinical technique to estimate pharyngeal collapsibility in people with obstructive sleep apnea.

Amal M Osman1,2,3, Benjamin K Tong1, Shane A Landry3,4, Bradley A Edwards3,4, Simon A Joosten5,6, Garun S Hamilton5,6, Jennifer M Cori3,7, Amy S Jordan3,7, David Stevens2,3, Ronald R Grunstein3,8, R Doug McEvoy2,3, Peter G Catcheside2,3, Danny J Eckert1,2,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Quantification of upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could help inform targeted therapy decisions. However, current techniques are clinically impractical. The primary aim of this study was to assess if a simple, novel technique could be implemented as part of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study to assess pharyngeal collapsibility.
METHODS: A total of 35 participants (15 female) with OSA (mean ± SD apnea-hypopnea index = 35 ± 19 events/h) were studied. Participants first completed a simple clinical intervention during a routine CPAP titration, where CPAP was transiently turned off from the therapeutic pressure for ≤5 breaths/efforts on ≥5 occasions during stable non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep for quantitative assessment of airflow responses (%peak inspiratory flow [PIF] from preceding 5 breaths). Participants then underwent an overnight physiology study to determine the pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) and repeat transient drops to zero CPAP to assess airflow response reproducibility.
RESULTS: Mean PIF of breaths 3-5 during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention versus the physiology night were similar (34 ± 29% vs. 28 ± 30% on therapeutic CPAP, p = 0.2; range 0%-90% vs. 0%-95%). Pcrit was -1.0 ± 2.5 cmH2O (range -6 to 5 cmH2O). Mean PIF during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention and the physiology night correlated with Pcrit (r = -0.7 and -0.9, respectively, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated significant diagnostic utility for the simple intervention to predict Pcrit < -2 and < 0 cmH2O (AUC = 0.81 and 0.92), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple CPAP intervention can successfully discriminate between patients with and without mild to moderately collapsible pharyngeal airways. This scalable approach may help select individuals most likely to respond to non-CPAP therapies. © Sleep Research Society 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical tool; endotyping; respiratory physiology; sleep disordered breathing; upper airway anatomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267509     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  4 in total

1.  Upper airway collapsibility in patients with OSA treated with continuous positive airway pressure: a retrospective preliminary study.

Authors:  Marcello Bosi; Serena Incerti Parenti; Andrea Fiordelli; Venerino Poletti; Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  A Novel Model to Estimate Key Obstructive Sleep Apnea Endotypes from Standard Polysomnography and Clinical Data and Their Contribution to Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity.

Authors:  Ritaban Dutta; Gary Delaney; Barbara Toson; Amy S Jordan; David P White; Andrew Wellman; Danny J Eckert
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-04

3.  It's possible: why don't we do it?

Authors:  Winfried Randerath
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 4.  Manipulation of Lateral Pharyngeal Wall Muscles in Sleep Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Luigi Marco Stringa; Giannicola Iannella; Giuseppe Meccariello; Henry Zhang; Ahmed Yassin Bahgat; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Carlos Chiesa-Estomba; Jerome R Lechien; Maria Rosaria Barillari; Bruno Galletti; Francesco Galletti; Francesco Freni; Cosimo Galletti; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.