Amal A El Daibani1, Fatemah A Alherz1, Maryam S Abunnaja1, Ahsan F Bairam1,2, Mohammed I Rasool1,3, Katsuhisa Kurogi1,4, Ming-Cheh Liu5. 1. Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq. 3. Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Karbala, Karbala, Iraq. 4. Biochemistry and Applied Biosciences, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan. 5. Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA. ming.liu@utoledo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have revealed that sulfation, as mediated by the estrogen-sulfating cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) SULT1E1, is involved in the metabolism of 17β-estradiol (E2), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OH-tamoxifen), and diethylstilbestrol in humans. It is an interesting question whether the genetic polymorphisms of SULT1E1, the gene that encodes the SULT1E1 enzyme, may impact on the metabolism of E2 and these two drug compounds through sulfation. METHODS: In this study, five missense coding single nucleotide polymorphisms of the SULT1E1 gene were selected to investigate the sulfating activity of the coded SULT1E1 allozymes toward E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol. Corresponding cDNAs were generated by site-directed mutagenesis, and recombinant SULT1E1 allozymes were bacterially expressed, affinity-purified, and characterized using enzymatic assays. RESULTS: Purified SULT1E1 allozymes were shown to display differential sulfating activities toward E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol. Kinetic analysis revealed further distinct Km (reflecting substrate affinity) and Vmax (reflecting catalytic activity) values of the five SULT1E1 allozymes with E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol as substrates. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings highlighted the significant differences in E2-, as well as the drug-sulfating activities of SULT1E1 allozymes, which may have implications in the differential metabolism of E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol in individuals with different SULT1E1 genotypes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have revealed that sulfation, as mediated by the estrogen-sulfating cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) SULT1E1, is involved in the metabolism of 17β-estradiol (E2), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OH-tamoxifen), and diethylstilbestrol in humans. It is an interesting question whether the genetic polymorphisms of SULT1E1, the gene that encodes the SULT1E1 enzyme, may impact on the metabolism of E2 and these two drug compounds through sulfation. METHODS: In this study, five missense coding single nucleotide polymorphisms of the SULT1E1 gene were selected to investigate the sulfating activity of the coded SULT1E1 allozymes toward E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol. Corresponding cDNAs were generated by site-directed mutagenesis, and recombinant SULT1E1 allozymes were bacterially expressed, affinity-purified, and characterized using enzymatic assays. RESULTS: Purified SULT1E1 allozymes were shown to display differential sulfating activities toward E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol. Kinetic analysis revealed further distinct Km (reflecting substrate affinity) and Vmax (reflecting catalytic activity) values of the five SULT1E1 allozymes with E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol as substrates. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings highlighted the significant differences in E2-, as well as the drug-sulfating activities of SULT1E1 allozymes, which may have implications in the differential metabolism of E2, 4OH-tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol in individuals with different SULT1E1 genotypes.
Authors: H Kim Crewe; Lisa M Notley; Rebecca M Wunsch; Martin S Lennard; Elizabeth M J Gillam Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: B Fisher; J P Costantino; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; W M Cronin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1994-04-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Aurelia H M de Vries Schultink; Wilbert Zwart; Sabine C Linn; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Hye In Woo; Se Kyung Lee; Jiyoung Kim; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Soo Youn Bae; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Soo-Youn Lee Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-01
Authors: Katsuhisa Kurogi; Mohammed I Rasool; Fatemah A Alherz; Amal A El Daibani; Ahsan F Bairam; Maryam S Abunnaja; Shin Yasuda; Lauren J Wilson; Ying Hui; Ming-Cheh Liu Journal: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 4.936