Literature DB >> 33063945

Clinical outcomes of non-osteogenic, non-Ewing soft-tissue sarcoma of bone--experience of the Toronto Sarcoma Program.

Zachary W Veitch1,2, Samir Fasih1,2, Anthony M Griffin1,3, Esmail M Al-Ezzi1,2, Abha A Gupta3, Peter C Ferguson1,2,4,5, Jay S Wunder1,2,4,5, Albiruni R Abdul Razak1,2.   

Abstract

Non-osteogenic, non-Ewing soft-tissue sarcoma (NONE-STS) of bone is a rare presentation of primary bone cancers. Optimal treatments and outcomes for this heterogenous group are poorly described. We evaluated the factors associated with long-term outcomes in patients with this disease. Patients with localized NONE-STS of bone treated at the Toronto Sarcoma Program from 1987 to 2017 were identified. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival information were collected. Kaplan-Meier (log-rank) survival estimates from the time of definitive surgery, with uni-/multivariate analyses (Cox) of sarcoma-specific survival were performed. A total of 106 patients (60.4% male; median age 46 years) with NONE-STS of bone were identified. Common histologies included undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS]/malignant fibrous histiocytoma [MFH] (UPS/MFH, 41.5%), leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 20.8%), and fibrosarcoma (FS, 11.3%). Tumors were often high grade (59.4%) and involved the extremities (88.7%), with most receiving chemotherapy (67.9%) with cisplatin/doxorubicin-based regimens (73.6%). In the full cohort, 10-year DFS (45.7%, [95%CI: 35.7-55.8%]), OS (53.4%, [95%CI: 41.7-62.2%]), and SSS (63.9%, [95%CI: 53.9-72.5%]) were moderate. Histology specific, 10-year SSS was 70.7% [95%CI: 56.1-85.5%] for UPS/MFH, 51.8% [95%CI: 29.8-73.8%] for LMS, and 72.2% [95%CI: 45.1-99.2%] for FS. Only UPS/MFH (n = 4) showed sarcoma-related death >10 years. Multivariate analysis identified axial location (HR = 35.5, [95%CI: 3.4-369.6]), high grade (HR = 16.9, [95%CI: 1.6-185.1]), and disease relapse (HR = 485.1, [95%CI: 36.3-6482.6]) as risk factors for death (p < 0.05). Treatment with chemotherapy (HR = 0.1, [95%CI: 0.01-0.86]) and necrosis ≥85% (HR = 0.2, [95%CI: 0.04-0.99]) showed improved survival (p < 0.05). NONE-STS of bone has favorable long-term survival similar to osteosarcoma. Patients receiving chemotherapy derive benefit in retrospective analyses. UPS/MFH histologies show sarcoma-related death beyond 10 years. Further data on histologic subgroups are needed.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sarcoma; Toronto Sarcoma; bone sarcoma; osteosarcoma; soft-tissue sarcoma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33063945      PMCID: PMC7774718          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  22 in total

1.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017.

Authors:  J Sybil Biermann; Warren Chow; Damon R Reed; David Lucas; Douglas R Adkins; Mark Agulnik; Robert S Benjamin; Brian Brigman; G Thomas Budd; William T Curry; Aarati Didwania; Nicola Fabbri; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph B Kuechle; Dieter Lindskog; Joel Mayerson; Sean V McGarry; Lynn Million; Carol D Morris; Sujana Movva; Richard J O'Donnell; R Lor Randall; Peter Rose; Victor M Santana; Robert L Satcher; Herbert Schwartz; Herrick J Siegel; Katherine Thornton; Victor Villalobos; Mary Anne Bergman; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols.

Authors:  Stefan S Bielack; Beate Kempf-Bielack; Günter Delling; G Ulrich Exner; Silke Flege; Knut Helmke; Rainer Kotz; Mechthild Salzer-Kuntschik; Matthias Werner; Winfried Winkelmann; Andreas Zoubek; Heribert Jürgens; Kurt Winkler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Malignancy in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  B R Korf
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2000

4.  MFH of bone and osteosarcoma show similar survival and chemosensitivity.

Authors:  Dae-Geun Jeon; Won Seok Song; Chang-Bae Kong; Jung Ryul Kim; Soo-Yong Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone. A clinicopathologic study of 81 patients.

Authors:  J Nishida; F H Sim; D E Wenger; K K Unni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic significance of treatment-induced pathologic necrosis in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  John T Mullen; Francis J Hornicek; David C Harmon; Kevin A Raskin; Yen-Lin Chen; Jackie Szymonifka; Beow Y Yeap; Edwin Choy; Thomas F DeLaney; G Petur Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Intraosseous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with local recurrence, lung metastases and death.

Authors:  Tuba Karagülle Kendi; Aziz Erakar; H Yusuf Yildiz; Yener Saglik; Selim Erekul
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  An intraosseous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the cervical spine: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sung-Jun Moon; Jung-Kil Lee; Bo-Ra Seo; Jae-Hyoo Kim; Soo-Han Kim; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Min-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Primary fibrosarcoma of bone. A clinicopathologic study of 130 patients.

Authors:  A G Huvos; N L Higinbotham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: analysis of prognosis.

Authors:  P Brewer; V Sumathi; R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman; A Abudu; L Jeys
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.