| Literature DB >> 33061987 |
Manal Madany Abdalqader1, Shatha Sami Hussein1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Kisspeptin 1 might reflect increased androgen level in polycystic ovarian syndrome instead of other markers. Study Design. A case control study was performed in Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital from 1st of July 2016 to 1st of July 2017; it involved 87 women divided into two groups: 44 women diagnosed as PCOS, 22 women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 22 women with BMI < 25 kg/m2, and another 43 women without PCOS, 22 women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 21 women with BMI < 25 kg/m2. Hormonal, metabolic profiles, and hirsutism scores, as well as serum kisspeptin level, were assessed by using Human Kisspeptin 1(KISS-1) ELISA Kit. The blood samples between days 2 and 5 of menstrual cycle were drawn by an disposable sterile syringe and collected in EDTA containing tubes (as anticoagulant), and the hormonal profile was measured using a biotech ELISA reader. RESULT: Serum level of kisspeptin was significantly higher in PCOS compared to control (322.4 vs. 235.3 ng/L, respectively). There was no significant difference in age, BMI, and parity between control and PCOS; the frequency of hirsutism, acne, elevated LH, and increased free testosterone (fTT) were significantly higher in PCOS compared to control. Kisspeptin shows a direct significant correlation with hirsutism and fTT (r = 0.648, 0.238, respectively). In ROC analysis, kisspeptin had AUC (95% CI) = 0.874 (0.785-0.935) for predicting PCOS.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33061987 PMCID: PMC7533004 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5216903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int ISSN: 1687-9597
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2Plasma kisspeptin (metastin) levels of women with regard to the body mass index (asterisk and small circles represent the outliers).
Comparison between control and PCOS women.
| Parameters | Control | PCOS |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 44 | 43 | — |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 24.5 ± 5.6 | 26.3 ± 6.0 | 0.162 |
| Parity, median (IQR) | 1 (0.25–2.0) | 2 (1–3) | 0.120 |
| Kisspeptin (ng/L), median (IQR) | 235.3 (220.6–258.4) | 322.4 (254.6–377.1) | <0.001 |
| BMI, | |||
| <25 kg/m2 | 21 (47.7%) | 23 (53.5%) | 0.591 |
| ≥25 kg/m2 | 23 (52.3%) | 20 (46.5%) | |
| Hirsutism, | 0 (0%) | 43 (100%) | <0.001 |
| Acne, | 18 (40.9%) | 27 (62.8%) | 0.041 |
| Elevated LH, | 14 (31.8%) | 27 (62.8%) | 0.004 |
| FSH, | |||
| Normal | 31 (70.5%) | 28 (65.1%) | 0.700 |
| Decreased | 9 (20.5%) | 12 (27.9%) | |
| Elevated | 4 (9.1%) | 3 (7%) | |
| Increased TSH, | 11 (25%) | 13 (30.2%) | 0.585 |
| Increased PRL, | 20 (45.5%) | 15 (34.9%) | 0.315 |
| SHBG, | |||
| Normal | 31 (70.5%) | 29 (67.4%) | 0.952 |
| Decreased | 11 (25%) | 12 (27.9%) | |
| Elevated | 2 (4.5%) | 2 (4.7%) | |
| Increased testosterone, | 18 (40.9%) | 28 (65.1%) | 0.024 |
| DHEAS, | |||
| Normal | 31 (70.5%) | 30 (69.8%) | 0.923 |
| Decreased | 8 (18.2%) | 7 (16.3%) | |
| Elevated | 5 (11.4%) | 6 (14%) | |
| Glycemic status, | |||
| Normal | 25 (56.8%) | 21 (48.8%) | 0.695 |
| Decreased | 9 (20.5%) | 9 (20.9%) | |
| Elevated | 10 (22.7%) | 13 (30.2%) | |
| Impaired lipid profile | 14 (31.8%) | 16 (37.2%) | 0.597 |
SD: standard deviation, n: number, IQR: interquartile range (25th–57th percentile), PRL: prolactin, SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin, T: testosterone, DHEAS: dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and FPG: fasting blood glucose.
Correlations between kisspeptin with demographic and clinical characteristics and hormonal and metabolic profiles of all subjects (including controls).
| Parameters | Correlation coefficient ( |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.016 | 0.886 |
| Parity | 0.131 | 0.228 |
| BMI | 0.066 | 0.541 |
| Hirsutism | 0.648 | <0.001 |
| Acne | 0.073 | 0.500 |
| LH | 0.139 | 0.199 |
| FSH | −0.194 | 0.072 |
| TSH | −0.045 | 0.679 |
| PRL | −0.133 | 0.218 |
| SHBG | −0.032 | 0.772 |
| Testosterone | 0.238 | 0.027 |
| DHEAS | −0.101 | 0.353 |
| FPG | −0.064 | 0.558 |
PRL: prolactin, SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin, DHEAS: dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and FPG: fasting blood glucose.
ROC analysis of the validity of kisspeptin as a predictor of PCOS.
| ROC (95% CI) | Cutoff | SN | SP | AC (%) | PPV | NPV | +LH | −LH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.874 (0.785–0.935) | ≥271.234 | 74.4 | 88.6 | 81.6 | 86.5 | 78.0 | 6.55 | 0.29 |
SN: sensitivity, SP: specificity, AC: accuracy, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, and LH: likelihood ratio.
Figure 3ROC analysis for kisspeptin levels between the PCOS and the control groups.
Multiple regression analysis for the e factors that affect PCOS.
| Parameters | OR (95% CI) | Wald |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.106 (0.987–1.240) | 2.999 | 0.083 |
| BMI | 0.440 (0.110–1.755) | 1.353 | 0.245 |
| Kisspeptin | 1.039 (1.019–1.059) | 15.313 | >0.001 [S] |
| LH | 12.002 (2.543–56.651) | 9.852 | 0.002 [S] |
| Free TT | 3.385 (0.870–3.179) | 3.092 | 0.079 |
R 2 (Cox and Snell) = 0.514.