| Literature DB >> 33060650 |
Yacheng Hu1,2, Kan Xiao1,2, Jing Yang1,2, Xueqing Liu1,2, Binzhong Wang1,2, Qingkai Zeng1,2, Hejun Du3,4.
Abstract
In this study, the effects of different feeding frequencies on the growth and the expression of genes in the GH/IGF axis were assessed in juvenile Chinese sturgeon. The newly hatched Chinese sturgeons were bred for 38 days at three different feeding frequencies groups (feeding frequency of two times a day, TWD; three times a day, THD; and four times a day, FOD), and the expression levels of the GH/IGF axis responses to feeding frequency were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. In addition, the full-length of the Coding Sequences of IGF I and IGF II genes (489-bp and 660-bp, respectively), were cloned and analyzed from Chinese sturgeon the first time. Multiple sequence alignments of IGFs revealed that Chinese sturgeon are high sequence identity to IGFs from other species. The phylogenetic relationships based on the IGF I and IGF II amino acid sequences were consistent with the traditional classification. After 38 days of growth, the three different feeding frequencies groups of Chinese sturgeon had no significant difference of body length, body weight, specific growth rate, the survival rate, the rate of weight gain and the condition factor. However, the relative expression of Chinese sturgeon GH in the pituitary decreased with increasing feeding frequency. The relative expression of Chinese sturgeon GHR in liver and skeletal muscle was deceased with increasing feeding frequency, while the relative expression of GHR in stomach and intestines at THD group was significantly higher than that of at TWD group and FOD group (p < 0.05). The relative expression of Chinese sturgeon IGF I in liver increased significantly with increasing feeding frequency (p < 0.05). The relative expression of IGF I in stomach and skeletal muscle was similar at the three groups. The relative expression of IGF I in intestines was significantly higher at FOD group than at TWD group and THD group (p < 0.05). The relative expression of Chinese sturgeon IGF II in liver at TWD group was significantly higher than that at THD group and FOD group (p < 0.05). However, the relative expression of IGF II in stomach, intestines and skeletal muscle at THD group was higher than that at TWD group and FOD group. Based on these previous studies that liver IGF I is regarded as a biomarker of growth performance, this result suggested that the juvenile Chinese sturgeon is better for growth when feeding four times daily compared to twice and thrice daily.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33060650 PMCID: PMC7566834 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74120-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of quantitative real-time PCR primers used in this study.
| Primers | Sequence (5′–3′) | Production size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| IGF I-F1 | GTGTTCTGTGCCTGACTC | 402 |
| IGF I-R1 | GAAGAGCAAAATCCAGA | |
| IGF I-F2 | CCCATTCCTTCTTATTTCGC | 318 |
| IGF I-R2 | CATAGCCTGTTGGTTTGTTGA | |
| IGF II-F | AATGCCACAGAAAGGACG | 820 |
| IGF II-R | GCAGCAGAAACTGGGAAC | |
| GHR-F | TGAACATCAAGGACGACG | 318 |
| GHR-R | CGGGCGATAGCAGAAC | |
| IGF I-qF | GTACTGTGCGCCTGTTAA | 164 |
| IGF I-qR | TCCTGTTGCCTATGTTCC | |
| IGF II-qF | ATCGCCCTCACAGTCTACAT | 130 |
| IGF II-qR | GTGGCTTGCTGAAATAAAA | |
| GH-qF | ATGGCATCAGGTCTGCTTCT | 185 |
| GH-qR | ACGCTGCTCATCTGGAACATAG | |
| GHR-qF | CATAGAAATCCAGGTTTACCCAACTC | 271 |
| GHR-qR | CTGAACATCAAGGACGACGACTC | |
| TTATGCCCTGCCCCACGCTATC | 201 | |
| CGTGTGAAGTGGTAAGTCCGT |
Growth parameters of Amur sturgeon after 38 days of growth at different stocking frequencies.
| Item | The group of feeding two times daily (TWD) | The group of feeding three times daily (THD) | The group of feeding four times daily (FOD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (IBW, g) | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.15 ± 0.02a |
| Initial body length (IBL, cm) | 3.47 ± 0.05a | 3.46 ± 0.04a | 3.47 ± 0.06a |
| Finally body weight (FBW, g) | 2.44 ± 0.5a | 2.58 ± 0.59a | 2.54 ± 0.49a |
| Finally body length (FBL, cm) | 7.01 ± 0.56a | 7.17 ± 0.62a | 7.13 ± 0.51a |
| Specific growth rate (SGR) | 7.51 ± 0.56a | 7.65 ± 0.66a | 7.64 ± 0.54a |
| Survival rate (SR) (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| The rate of weight gain (WGR) (%) | 1545.72 ± 336.78a | 1644.83 ± 396.77a | 1618.39 ± 330.92a |
| Condition factor (CF) | 0.007 ± 0.00065a | 0.0069 ± 0.00052a | 0.007 ± 0.00055a |
Values not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p < 0.05). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 1Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of Chinese sturgeon IGFs. (a) Chinese sturgeon IGF I. (b) Chinese sturgeon IGF II. The putative signal peptide is marked in red. A putative conserved domain is marked in blue. Predicted phosphorylation sites are boxed in black. Prediction of glycosylation site of proteins are indicated in green. Prediction of transmembrane helix structure of protein are boxed in purple. The stop codon is denoted by an asterisk.
Figure 2Predicted signal peptide of IGFs protein in Chinese sturgeon. (a) Chinese sturgeon IGF I. (b) Chinese sturgeon IGF II.
Figure 3Chinese sturgeon IGFs protein second structure prediction via PSIPRED. (a) Chinese sturgeon IGF I. (b) Chinese sturgeon IGF II.
Figure 4Chinese sturgeon IGFs protein tertiary structure prediction via Chimera. (a) Chinese sturgeon IGF I. (b) Chinese sturgeon IGF II.
Figure 5Multiple alignment of IGFs proteins in different species. The IGFs sequences from other species were downloaded from GenBank. The references for the GenBank Accession Numbers of IGFs amino acid sequences are as follows: Acipenser sinensis IGFs (AsiIGFs, MK028132 and MK028133); Acipenser ruthenus IGF I (ArIGF I, DQ329352); Acipenser baerii IGF I (AbIGF I, FJ428828); Acipenser persicus IGF I (ApIGF I, GU325629); Acipenser schrenckii IGF II (AscIGF II, KC484697); Danio rerio IGFs (DrIGFs, NM_131825 and AY049027); Lateolabrax japonicas IGFs (LjIGFs, JN596878 and JN596879); Sparus aurata IGFs (SaIGFs, AY996779 and AY996778); Trachinotus ovatus IGFs (ToIGFs, KT727922 and KT727923); Gallus gallus IGFs (GgIGFs, NM_001004384 and NM_001030342); Bos Taurus IGFs (BtIGFs, NM_001077828 and NM_174087); Sus scrofa IGFs (SsIGFs, NM_214256 and XM_021080648); Homo sapiens IGFs (HsIGFs, NM_001111283 and NP_001121070); Mus musculus IGFs (MmIGFs, AY878193 and M14951.1) and Cyprinus carpio IGF II (CcIGF II, HM641129). (a) Chinese sturgeon IGF I. (b) Chinese sturgeon IGF II.
Figure 6Phylogenetic tree of IGF I and IGF II constructed by the neighbor-joining method.
Figure 7Response of GH (a), GHR (b), IGF I (c) and IGF II (d) to different feeding frequency in Chinese sturgeon. Data with different letters was significantly different (p < 0.05).