Literature DB >> 3305960

Statistical test for the comparison of samples from mutational spectra.

W T Adams, T R Skopek.   

Abstract

The Monte Carlo estimate of the p value of the hypergeometric test is described and advocated for the testing of the hypothesis that different treatments induce the same mutational spectrum. The hypergeometric test is a generalization of Fisher's "exact" test for tables with more than two rows and two columns. Use of the test is demonstrated by the analysis of data from the characterization of nonsense mutations in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli. Unlike the chi-square test, the hypergeometric test remains valid when applied to sparse cross-classification tables. The hypergeometric test has the most discrimination power of any statistical test that could be employed routinely to compare samples from mutational spectra. Direct application of the hypergeometric test to large cross-classification tables is excessively computation intensive, but estimation of its p value via Monte Carlo techniques is practical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3305960     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90669-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  77 in total

1.  Influence of sex, smoking and age on human hprt mutation frequencies and spectra.

Authors:  J Curry; L Karnaoukhova; G C Guenette; B W Glickman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Bayesian analysis of mutational spectra.

Authors:  D B Dunson; K R Tindall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Multiple mutations and frameshifts are the hallmark of defective hPMS2 in pZ189-transfected human tumor cells.

Authors:  S Ceccotti; C Ciotta; G Fronza; E Dogliotti; M Bignami
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A Large-scale genetic association study of esophageal adenocarcinoma risk.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Liu; Michael C Wu; Feng Chen; Monica Ter-Minassian; Kofi Asomaning; Rihong Zhai; Zhaoxi Wang; Li Su; Rebecca S Heist; Matthew H Kulke; Xihong Lin; Geoffrey Liu; David C Christiani
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Correlation of somatic hypermutation specificity and A-T base pair substitution errors by DNA polymerase eta during copying of a mouse immunoglobulin kappa light chain transgene.

Authors:  Youri I Pavlov; Igor B Rogozin; Alexey P Galkin; Anna Y Aksenova; Fumio Hanaoka; Christina Rada; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distinct signatures for mutator sensitivity of lacZ reversions and for the spectrum of lacI/lacO forward mutations on the chromosome of nondividing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Shanti M Bharatan; Manjula Reddy; J Gowrishankar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  AFB(1) -induced mutagenesis of the gpt gene in AS52 cells.

Authors:  Roongtiwa Wattanawaraporn; Min Young Kim; Jillian Adams; Laura J Trudel; Leslie L Woo; Robert G Croy; John M Essigmann; Gerald N Wogan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Identifying functionally important mutations from phenotypically diverse sequence data.

Authors:  Kyle Jensen; Hal Alper; Curt Fischer; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Differential mutagenicity of riddelliine in liver endothelial and parenchymal cells of transgenic big blue rats.

Authors:  Nan Mei; Ming W Chou; Peter P Fu; Robert H Heflich; Tao Chen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Stella Tommasi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.