| Literature DB >> 33058409 |
Yan Shi1, Huaizhou Wang1, Julius Oatts2, Kai Cao1, Chen Xin1, Xintong Liang1, Jiaxin Tian1, Ying Han2, Ningli Wang1.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: This is the first comprehensive comparison between ab interno approach and ab externo approach for microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy in primary congenital glaucoma with clear cornea.Entities:
Keywords: ab externo microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy; ab interno microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy; clear cornea; primary congenital glaucoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33058409 PMCID: PMC7756548 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 1442-6404 Impact factor: 4.207
Comparison of subject clinical characteristics and extent of trabeculotomy between ab interno and ab externo MAT
| Parameter | Total | Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients (N, %) | 89 | 56 (54) | 47 (46) | .38 |
| Number of eyes (N, %) | 115 | 58 (50) | 57 (50) | .93 |
| Unilateral/bilateral onset | 14/75 | 11/45 | 3/44 | .003 |
| Gender (male/female) | 83/32 | 47/11 | 36/21 | .03 |
| OD/OS | 63/52 | 33/25 | 30/27 | .65 |
| Age (months, median, range) | 31 (3‐168) | 31 (4‐168) | 30 (3‐130) | .90 |
| Stage of onset age (stage 1/2/3) | 52/44/19 | 27/22/9 | 25/22/10 | .68 |
| Corneal diameter (mm, median, range) | 13.0 (10.0‐16.0) | 13 (10.5‐15.0) | 13.0 (10.0‐16.0) | .17 |
| Cup‐to‐disc ratio (median, range) | 0.8 (0.4‐1.0) | 0.85 (0.6‐1.0) | 0.8 (0.4‐1.0) | .20 |
| Number of eyes with previous surgeries (0/1/2 surgeries) | 61/36/18 | 33/14/11 | 28/22/7 | .93 |
| Trabeculotomy (1/2 surgeries) | 16/0 | 9/0 | 7/0 | |
| Goniotomy (1/2 surgeries) | 7/0 | 2/0 | 5/0 | |
| Trabeculotomy + trabeculectomy (1/2 surgeries) | 16/4 | 7/2 | 9/2 | |
| Glaucoma drainage implant (1/2 surgeries) | 5/0 | 2/0 | 3/0 | |
| Trabeculectomy (1/2 surgeries) | 14/3 | 8/2 | 6/1 | |
| Number of preoperative medications (median, range) | 3 (0‐4) | 3 (1‐4) | 3 (0‐4) | .14 |
| Preoperative IOP (mmHg, mean [95% confidence intervals]) | 33.7 (32.4‐35.0) | 33.5 (31.7‐35.3) | 33.8 (32.0‐35.7) | .81 |
| Number of eyes with different extent of trabeculotomy (360°/≥180° and <360°/<180°) | 77/30/8 | 40/18/0 | 37/12/8 | .13 |
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; MAT, microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister.
Statistical significance.
Cumulative success rate for groups
| Follow‐up | Complete success (%) | Qualified success (%) | N (eyes) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT | Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT | Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT | ||
| 1 month | 91.4 | 82.5 | 94.8 | 89.5 | 58 | 57 | |
| 3 months | 84.5 | 78.9 | 89.7 | 87.7 | 58 | 57 | |
| 6 months | 82.8 | 77.1 | 87.9 | 85.9 | 57 | 55 | |
| 9 months | 81.0 | 73.3 | 87.9 | 82.2 | 51 | 53 | |
| 12 months | 81.0 | 73.3 | 87.9 | 82.2 | 49 | 47 | |
Abbreviation: MAT, microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy.
FIGURE 1Kaplan‐Meier survival plots of the cumulative probability of success rate for ab interno and ab externo microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy
IOP and number of medications between groups at each follow‐up
| IOP (mmHg, Mean [95% confidence intervals]) | Medications (Mean [95% confidence intervals]) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow‐up | Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT |
| Ab interno MAT | Ab externo MAT |
| |
| Preoperative | 33.5 (31.7‐35.3) | 33.8 (32.0‐35.7) | .81 | 2.7 (2.5‐2.9) | 2.9 (2.7‐3.0) | .14 | |
| 1 month | 15.0 (13.3‐16.7) | 16.1 (14.3‐17.8) | .38 | 0.4 (0.1‐0.7) | 0.6 (0.3‐0.9) | .36 | |
| 3 months | 16.0 (14.0‐18.0) | 16.3 (14.2‐18.3) | .87 | 0.4 (0.2‐0.7) | 0.6 (0.3‐0.9) | .52 | |
| 6 months | 16.1 (14.4‐17.9) | 16.2 (14.4‐18.0) | .95 | 0.5 (0.2‐0.7) | 0.4 (0.2‐0.7) | .98 | |
| 9 months | 15.7 (14.4‐16.9) | 16.0 (14.7‐17.3) | .71 | 0.2 (0‐0.4) | 0.4 (0.2‐0.6) | .15 | |
| 12 months | 15.5 (14.5‐16.5) | 15.7 (14.7‐16.7) | .78 | 0.2 (0‐0.4) | 0.5 (0.3‐0.8) | .04 | |
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; MAT, microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy.
Statistical significance.
FIGURE 2A, Box‐and‐whiskers plots showing the percentage of IOP reduction across eyes with 360° trabeculotomy and eyes with partial trabeculotomy. B, Box‐and‐whiskers plots showing the percentage of IOP reduction across eyes without previous surgeries and eyes with previous surgery. Box plots illustrate the median (50th percentile) as a black centre line and the 25th and 75th percentile as the lower and upper hinges of the box. Circles represent minor outliers and star represent extreme outliers. The black line across each chart is the median percentage of IOP reduction of all eyes. IOP, intraocular pressure