Literature DB >> 33058385

Hippocampal subfield volumetry from structural isotropic 1 mm3 MRI scans: A note of caution.

Laura E M Wisse1,2,3, Gaël Chételat4, Ana M Daugherty5,6,7, Robin de Flores4, Renaud la Joie8, Susanne G Mueller9,10, Craig E L Stark11, Lei Wang12,13, Paul A Yushkevich2, David Berron14, Naftali Raz5,6,15, Arnold Bakker16, Rosanna K Olsen17, Valerie A Carr18.   

Abstract

Spurred by availability of automatic segmentation software, in vivo MRI investigations of human hippocampal subfield volumes have proliferated in the recent years. However, a majority of these studies apply automatic segmentation to MRI scans with approximately 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 resolution, a resolution at which the internal structure of the hippocampus can rarely be visualized. Many of these studies have reported contradictory and often neurobiologically surprising results pertaining to the involvement of hippocampal subfields in normal brain function, aging, and disease. In this commentary, we first outline our concerns regarding the utility and validity of subfield segmentation on 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 MRI for volumetric studies, regardless of how images are segmented (i.e., manually or automatically). This image resolution is generally insufficient for visualizing the internal structure of the hippocampus, particularly the stratum radiatum lacunosum moleculare, which is crucial for valid and reliable subfield segmentation. Second, we discuss the fact that automatic methods that are employed most frequently to obtain hippocampal subfield volumes from 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 MRI have not been validated against manual segmentation on such images. For these reasons, we caution against using volumetric measurements of hippocampal subfields obtained from 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 images.
© 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1 mm3; FreeSurfer; MRI; hippocampal subfields; volumetry

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058385      PMCID: PMC7775994          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.399


  47 in total

1.  A reliable and valid method for manual demarcation of hippocampal head, body, and tail.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Qijing Yu; Robert Flinn; Noa Ofen
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Jean C Augustinack; Khoa Nguyen; Christopher M Player; Allison Player; Michelle Wright; Nicole Roy; Matthew P Frosch; Ann C McKee; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce Fischl; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Associative encoding and retrieval are predicted by functional connectivity in distinct hippocampal area CA1 pathways.

Authors:  Katherine Duncan; Alexa Tompary; Lila Davachi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John B Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Long Xie; Song-Lin Ding; Eske C Gertje; Lauren Mancuso; Daria Kliot; Sandhitsu R Das; David A Wolk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Relationships between regional neuronal loss and neurofibrillary changes in the hippocampal formation and duration and severity of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  M Bobinski; J Wegiel; M Tarnawski; M Bobinski; B Reisberg; M J de Leon; D C Miller; H M Wisniewski
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  Roles of human hippocampal subfields in retrieval of spatial and temporal context.

Authors:  Colin T Kyle; Dana N Smuda; Abdul S Hassan; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The association between hippocampal subfield volumes in mild cognitive impairment and conversion to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jessica Izzo; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye; Dennis van der Meer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra-high resolution in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Koen Van Leemput; Akram Bakkour; Thomas Benner; Graham Wiggins; Lawrence L Wald; Jean Augustinack; Bradford C Dickerson; Polina Golland; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Trajectories of the Hippocampal Subfields Atrophy in the Alzheimer's Disease: A Structural Imaging Study.

Authors:  Weina Zhao; Xuetong Wang; Changhao Yin; Mengfei He; Shuyu Li; Ying Han
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Memory Performance Correlates of Hippocampal Subfield Volume in Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtype.

Authors:  Kathryn M Broadhouse; Loren Mowszowski; Shantel Duffy; Isabella Leung; Nathan Cross; Michael J Valenzuela; Sharon L Naismith
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  18 in total

1.  Altered Development of Amygdala-Connected Brain Regions in Males and Females with Autism.

Authors:  Joshua K Lee; Derek S Andrews; Arzu Ozturk; Marjorie Solomon; Sally Rogers; David G Amaral; Christine Wu Nordahl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Perceived stress associations with hippocampal-dependent behavior and hippocampal subfield volume.

Authors:  Daniel W Grupe; Alexandra L Barnes; Lauren Gresham; Andrew Kirvin-Quamme; Elizabeth Nord; Andrew L Alexander; Heather C Abercrombie; Stacey M Schaefer; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  Anterolateral entorhinal cortex volume is associated with memory retention in clinically unimpaired older adults.

Authors:  Lok-Kin Yeung; Christiane Hale; Batool Rizvi; Kay Igwe; Richard P Sloan; Lawrence S Honig; Scott A Small; Adam M Brickman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Comparison of Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation Agreement between 2 Automated Protocols across the Adult Life Span.

Authors:  A Samara; C A Raji; Z Li; T Hershey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.966

5.  Test-retest reliability of hippocampal subfield volumes in a developmental sample: Implications for longitudinal developmental studies.

Authors:  Roya Homayouni; Qijing Yu; Sruthi Ramesh; Lingfei Tang; Ana M Daugherty; Noa Ofen
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.433

Review 6.  Studying Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with 7-T magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Emrah Düzel; Mauro Costagli; Graziella Donatelli; Oliver Speck; Mirco Cosottini
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-08-26

7.  Novel characterization of the relationship between verbal list-learning outcomes and hippocampal subfields in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sandrine Cremona; Laure Zago; Emmanuel Mellet; Laurent Petit; Alexandre Laurent; Antonietta Pepe; Ami Tsuchida; Naka Beguedou; Marc Joliot; Christophe Tzourio; Bernard Mazoyer; Fabrice Crivello
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Hippocampal vascularization patterns exert local and distant effects on brain structure but not vascular pathology in old age.

Authors:  Niklas Vockert; Valentina Perosa; Gabriel Ziegler; Frank Schreiber; Anastasia Priester; Marco Spallazzi; Berta Garcia-Garcia; Merita Aruci; Hendrik Mattern; Aiden Haghikia; Emrah Düzel; Stefanie Schreiber; Anne Maass
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 9.  Hippocampal subfield volumetry from structural isotropic 1 mm3 MRI scans: A note of caution.

Authors:  Laura E M Wisse; Gaël Chételat; Ana M Daugherty; Robin de Flores; Renaud la Joie; Susanne G Mueller; Craig E L Stark; Lei Wang; Paul A Yushkevich; David Berron; Naftali Raz; Arnold Bakker; Rosanna K Olsen; Valerie A Carr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.399

10.  Neuroanatomical norms in the UK Biobank: The impact of allometric scaling, sex, and age.

Authors:  Camille Michèle Williams; Hugo Peyre; Roberto Toro; Franck Ramus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.