| Literature DB >> 33057067 |
Jackie A Heitzman1, Tyler C Dobratz1, Kaleb D Fischer1, DeWayne Townsend2.
Abstract
Understanding the energetic state of the heart is essential for unraveling the central tenets of cardiac physiology. The heart uses a tremendous amount of energy and reductions in that energy supply can have lethal consequences. While ischemic events clearly result in significant metabolic perturbations, heart failure with both preserved and reduced ejection fraction display reductions in energetic status. To date, most cardiac energetics have been performed using 31P-NMR, which requires dedicated access to a specialized NMR spectrometer. This has limited the availability of this method to a handful of centers around the world. Here we present a method of assessing myocardial energetics in the isolated mouse heart using 1H-NMR spectrometers that are widely available in NMR core facilities. In addition, this methodology provides information on many other important metabolites within the heart, including unique metabolic differences between the hypoxic and ischemic hearts. Furthermore, we demonstrate the correlation between myocardial energetics and measures of contractile function in the mouse heart. These methods will allow a broader examination of myocardial energetics providing a valuable tool to aid in the understanding of the nature of these energetic deficits and to develop therapies directed at improving myocardial energetics in failing hearts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33057067 PMCID: PMC7560830 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74241-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Defining the conditions to allow the quantification of purine nucleotides from extracts of cardiac muscle. (A) Schematic of ATP with Mg2+ ion. The proton used for distinct quantification is highlighted in red. (B) The effect of Mg2+ ion concentration in equimolar concentrations of ATP and ADP. The presence of Mg2+ alters the chemical shift of the ATP proton, but not the ADP; resulting in a convergence of these peaks with physiological concentrations of Mg2+. (C) 1H-NMR spectra from polar metabolites extracted from perfused mouse hearts without (red) and with EDTA (blue). In the presence of EDTA, the ATP and ADP peaks are clearly distinct and easily quantifiable. (D) The effect of extract pH on the separation of the purine proton peaks, note the high mobility of the AMP proton. (E) The pH sensitivity creatine (Cr) and phosphocreatine (PCr) protons.
Figure 2Representative 1H-NMR spectrum of extracted polar myocardial metabolites. Peaks are labeled as: 1. Acetate; 2. ADP; 3. Alanine; 4. AMP; 5. Aspartate; 6. ATP; 7. Carnitine; 8. Phosphocreatine; 9. Creatine; 10. Ethylene Glycol; 11. Fumarate; 12. Glucose; 13. Glutamate; 14. Glycine; 15. Lactate; 16. NAD(H); 17. NADP(H); 18. Oxalacetate; 19. Pantothenate; 20. Pyruvate; 21; Succinate; 22. Taurine; 23. DSS. Note the spectra containing the residual water peak (4.70 to 4.85 ppm) is not shown. (A) Demonstrates the spectral region of adenine proton following addition of EDTA, note separation between ATP (6) and ADP (2). (B) Spectra represent peaks above the water peak (> 4.8 ppm) are multiplied by 10 to allow peak detail to be observed. (C) Represent peaks below 4.70 ppm.
Metabolite concentrations from control and ischemic hearts.
| Metabolite | Control | Ischemia | Hypoxia | Stat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate | 0.48 ± 0.04 (9) | 0.35 ± 0.02 (8) | 0.50 ± 0.02 (7) | a,c |
| ADP | 1.83 ± 0.19 (9) | 2.59 ± 0.33 (8) | 3.13 ± 0.17 (7) | b |
| Alanine | 2.74 ± 0.32 (9) | 3.00 ± 0.40 (8) | 4.87 ± 0.50 (7) | b,c |
| AMP | 0.23 ± 0.05 (9) | 0.94 ± 0.18 (8) | 2.04 ± 0.24 (7) | a,b,c |
| Aspartate | 2.80 ± 0.27 (9) | 1.71 ± 0.20 (8) | 2.68 ± 0.23 (6) | a,c |
| ATP | 9.00 ± 0.69 (9) | 5.29 ± 0.44 (8) | 4.90 ± 0.41 (7) | a,b |
| Carnitine | 1.95 ± 0.19 (7) | 1.15 ± 0.13 (8) | 1.10 ± 0.29 (4) | a,b |
| Choline | 0.09 ± 0.02 (4) | 0.07 ± NA (1) | 0.12 ± 0.05 (3) | |
| Creatine | 15.54 ± 1.30 (9) | 19.25 ± 2.26 (8) | 24.67 ± 1.21 (7) | b |
| Ethylene glycol | 0.13 ± 0.03 (9) | 0.22 ± 0.03 (8) | 0.18 ± 0.01 (6) | |
| Fumarate | 0.16 ± 0.05 (9) | 0.34 ± 0.05 (8) | 0.70 ± 0.05 (7) | a,b,c |
| Glucose1 | 7.40 ± 0.60 (9) | 3.10 ± 0.30 (8) | 9.01 ± 0.37 (7) | a,c |
| Glutamate | 8.24 ± 0.72 (9) | 6.42 ± 0.68 (8) | 5.55 ± 0.32 (7) | b |
| Glycine | 0.96 ± 0.27 (9) | 0.41 ± 0.12 (8) | 2.30 ± 0.56 (7) | b,c |
| IMP | ND | 0.03 ± 0.00 (2) | 0.23 ± 0.04 (5) | – |
| Lactate | 1.67 ± 0.31 (9) | 10.24 ± 1.66 (8) | 4.44 ± 0.40 (7) | a,c |
| NAD(H) | 2.44 ± 0.22 (9) | 1.84 ± 0.19 (8) | 2.10 ± 0.10 (7) | |
| NADP(H) | 0.19 ± 0.02 (9) | 0.14 ± 0.02 (8) | 0.17 ± 0.02 (7) | |
| Oxaloacetate | 2.14 ± 0.29 (9) | 1.46 ± 0.20 (8) | 2.54 ± 0.28 (6) | c |
| Pantothenate | 0.05 ± 0.01 (7) | 0.04 ± 0.01 (4) | 0.07 ± 0.01 (2) | |
| Phosphocreatine | 18.32 ± 2.02 (9) | 5.21 ± 0.62 (8) | 5.63 ± 0.37 (7) | a,b |
| Pyruvate1 | 0.11 ± 0.01 (9) | 0.03 ± 0.00 (8) | 0.11 ± 0.01 (7) | a,c |
| Succinate | 0.25 ± 0.04 (9) | 0.84 ± 0.17 (8) | 1.32 ± 0.25 (7) | a,b |
| Taurine | 85.23 ± 5.89 (9) | 71.34 ± 6.20 (8) | 88.61 ± 5.32 (7) |
Data are presented an mM assuming cytosolic distribution.
1Glucose and pyruvate are present in the perfusate, their concentration assumes uniform extracellular and cytosolic distribution.
Data mean ± SEM (n); a: P < 0.05 between Control and Ischemia; b: P < 0.05 between Control and Hypoxia; c: P < 0.05 between Ischemia and Hypoxia; ND Not detected.
Figure 3Unbiased analysis of metabolomic profiles clearly segregates ischemic hearts from controls. (A) Principle component analysis of the metabolomic profiles derived from 1H-NMR spectra clearly distinguish ischemic hearts from control hearts. (B) Unsupervised clustering of metabolomic data groups both hearts according to their treatment and metabolites according to their changes during ischemia.
Summary of baseline hemodynamic data for hearts in both control and ischemic treatment groups.
| Control (9) | Ischemia (8) | Hypoxia (7) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 11.9 ± 2.4 | 11.5 ± 2.1 | 14.6 ± 2.5 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 109.0 ± 7.8 | 113.6 ± 5.8 | 116.7 ± 7.3 |
| Developed pressure (mmHg) | 97.1 ± 8.0 | 102.1 ± 7.1 | 102.0 ± 9.1 |
| Maximum dP/dt (mmHg/s) | 4303.4 ± 195.8 | 4073.4 ± 410.6 | 4920.9 ± 429.2 |
| Minimum dP/dt (mmHg/s) | − 3006.3 ± 132.8 | − 2980.9 ± 352.9 | − 3670.4 ± 309.8 |
| RR interval (ms) | 132.5 ± 10.3 | 177.6 ± 27.6 | 141.4 ± 2.1 |
| Rate pressure product (mmHg/min) | 43,649 ± 2480 | 38,817 ± 4501 | 43,407 ± 3801 |
| Coronary flow (ml/min g) | 127.8 ± 9.1 | 97.7 ± 11.0 | 118.8 ± 17.1 |
| Oxygen consumption (µmol O2/min g) | 52.9 ± 5.4 | 40.3 ± 4.7 | 64.6 ± 7.2 |
| Cardiac efficiency (mmHg/µmol O2) | 903.5 ± 106.1 | 978.7 ± 71.7 | 685.6 ± 44.9 |
Data mean ± SEM, number of observations in table header.
Summary of contractile data following 1 min of ischemia or maintained perfusion with or without hypoxia.
| Control (9) | Ischemia (8) | Hypoxia (7) | Stat | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 12 ± 2.2 | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 24 ± 4.0 | b,c | ||
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 107 ± 7.0 | 17.0 ± 2.8 | 74 ± 6.0 | a,b,c | ||
| Developed pressure (mmHg) | 95 ± 7.5 | 13.1 ± 2.1 | 50 ± 7.4 | a,b,c | ||
| Maximum dP/dt (mmHg/s) | 4233 ± 213.8 | 1117.2 ± 181.3 | 3813 ± 783.7 | a,c | ||
| Minimum dP/dt (mmHg/s) | − 2927 ± 120.3 | − 856.0 ± 160.7 | − 1822 ± 148.6 | a,b,c | ||
| RR interval (msec) | 135 ± 11.4 | 383.8 ± 127.6 | 225 ± 54.8 | |||
| Rate pressure product (mmHg/min) | 42,524 ± 2941 | 3060 ± 524 | 15,041 ± 1696 | a,b,c | ||
| Coronary flow (ml/min g) | 124 ± 9.1 | NA | 154 ± 11.7 | b | ||
| Oxygen consumption (µmol O2/min g) | 52 ± 5.6 | NA | 39 ± 3.0 | |||
| Cardiac efficiency (mmHg/µmol O2) | 906 ± 115.0 | NA | 390 ± 33.5 | b | ||
Data mean ± SEM, derived from 7 and 8 hearts for Control and Ischemia conditions respectively. a: P < 0.05 between Control and Ischemia; b: P < 0.05 between Control and Hypoxia; c: P < 0.05 between Ischemia and Hypoxia.
Figure 4Correlations between energetic state and contractile function. Shown are the correlations rate pressure product (RPP and energetic status measured by phosphocreatine(PCr):ATP ratio (A–C), adenosine nucleotide energy charge (D–F), and ∆GATP (G–I). PCr:ATP and ∆GATP provide the best correlation to contractile function.