| Literature DB >> 33054810 |
Qiang Luo1,2,3, Lingli Zhang2, Chu-Chung Huang1, Yan Zheng4, Jonathan W Kanen5, Qi Zhao1, Ye Yao1, Erin B Quinlan6, Tianye Jia1,6, Tobias Banaschewski7, Arun L W Bokde8, Uli Bromberg9, Christian Büchel9, Herta Flor10,11, Vincent Frouin12, Hugh Garavan13, Penny Gowland14, Andreas Heinz15, Bernd Ittermann16, Jean-Luc Martinot17,18,19, Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot17,20, Frauke Nees7,10, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos12, Luise Poustka21,22, Sarah Hohmann7, Juliane H Fröhner23, Michael N Smolka23, Henrik Walter15, Robert Whelan24, Barbara J Sahakian1,2,5, Gunter Schumann1,6, Fei Li25, Jianfeng Feng26,27,28, Sylvane Desrivières6, Trevor W Robbins1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood trauma increases the risk for adult obesity through multiple complex pathways, and the neural substrates are yet to be determined.Entities:
Keywords: Adult obesity; Childhood trauma; Neurocognitive control pathway; Structural brain imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33054810 PMCID: PMC7559717 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01743-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 11.150
Demographic characteristics of 639 young participants from the IMAGEN study a
| Childhood Abuse | 240 | 74 | 240 | 85 |
| EA | 251 | 63 | 254 | 71 |
| PA | 298 | 16 | 302 | 23 |
| SA | 305 | 9 | 302 | 23 |
| Childhood Neglect | 202 | 112 | 237 | 88 |
| EN | 227 | 87 | 261 | 64 |
| PN | 263 | 51 | 281 | 44 |
| Baseline BMI | 20.76 ± 3.16 | 21.91 ± 3.87 | 21.26 ± 3.25 | 21.68 ± 3.19 |
| Follow-up BMI | 23.29 ± 3.52 | 24.79 ± 4.87 | 23.27 ± 3.87 | 23.98 ± 4.96 |
| PRSBMI | − 1.760 × 10−4 (4.442 × 10−5) | − 1.645 × 10−4 (3.891 × 10−5) | − 1.782 × 10−4 (4.547 × 10−5) | − 1.661 × 10−4 (4.117 × 10−5) |
| Illegal drug use | 50.25% | 67.21% | 35.61% | 47.95% |
| Depressive score | 19.19 ± 1.52 | 18.46 ± 2.09 | 18.93 ± 1.85 | 17.53 ± 2.74 |
Numbers of subjects with a particular characteristic are listed as integers or percentage, and quantitative measurements are presented as mean values ± standard deviations
EA emotional abuse, PA physical abuse, SA sexual abuse, EN emotional neglect, PN physical neglect, BMI body mass index, PRS polygenic risk score for obesity
Fig. 1Association between childhood abuse, PRSBMI, and BMI. a Childhood abuse associated with higher rate of overweight and obesity in male participants, but not in female participants in the IMAGEN study. b Polygenic risk for obesity associated with BMI’s in both male and female participants in the IMAGEN study. c Childhood abuse associated with higher BMI in both male and female participants in the UK Biobank. d Polygenic risk for obesity associated with BMI in both male and female participants in the UK Biobank. NoCA, no childhood abuse; CA, childhood abuse; OB, obesity; OW, overweight; NW, normal weight
Fig. 2Brain regions associated with childhood trauma, genetic risk for higher BMI, and BMI. a The significant brain regions with GMV associated with both childhood abuse and BMI (marked by blue and pink), associated with both genetic risk and BMI (marked by green and pink), and the overlapped brain regions (i.e., brain regions associated with childhood abuse, genetic risk, and BMI, marked by pink) in male participants from the IMAGEN study. b, c The significant brain regions with GMV associated with variables mentioned above in male or female participants from the UK Biobank. Gray dotted line roughly marked the inner contour of the frontopolar cortex. GMV, gray matter volume; CA, childhood abuse; BMI, body mass index; PRSBMI, polygenic risk score for obesity
Fig. 3Associations were coupled between abuse-BMI and abuse-brain. a Smaller volume of the FPC was associated with deeper negative association between CA and the FPC volume (CA-FPC assoc) across both male (gray dots) and female (blue dots) subjects at the 6 data collection sites in the IMAGEN cohort. The FPC volume shown here was the ratio between the raw FPC volume and the TIV. b The partial correlation coefficient between CA and BMI was associated with the partial correlation coefficient between CA and the FPC volume in male subjects across the 6 data collection sites in the IMAGEN study and the UK Biobank sample. c Significant cortical connectivity of the hypothalamus using 7-T dMRI data from HCP. The fiber number was normalized as a percentage of the connections tracked between one brain region and one subdivision of the hypothalamus among all its tracked connections. The connections survived the FDR correction were reported. The upper plot shows the median of the fiber number, the middle plot marks the significant connectivity in black, and the lower plot shows the significant differences in connectivity between lateral and medial hypothalamus. The abbreviations of the cortical parcels are defined by the HCP-MMP atlas. The hypothalamus was divided into 8 subdivisions along the anterior-posterior and the medial-lateral lines. L, left; R, right; AL, anterior lateral; AM, anterior medial; PL, posterior lateral; PM, posterior medial. d One exemplar of the fiber tracking results. Only the fibers ending in the hypothalamus (marked in red, defined by the CIT168 atlas) were shown. The surface views of the white matter connectivity of the lateral (e) and the medial (f) hypothalamus. The maximum of the connectivity (normalized fiber number, %) between the anterior and posterior parts of either the lateral or the medial hypothalamus. FPC, frontopolar cortex; CA, childhood abuse; TIV, total intracranial volume; BMI, body mass index; HTH, hypothalamus
Fig. 4Associations among frontopolar volumes, childhood trauma, and BMI in the IMAGEN study. a-b The associations of the frontopolar volume with both childhood abuse and BMI in male participants at age 19 years. The frontopolar volumes were identified as the GMVs of brain region associated with both childhood abuse and BMI (marked by blue and red in Fig. 2a). These cross-sectional analyses indicated two potential paths among childhood abuse, frontopolar volume, and BMI. c Cross-lagged panel analysis between frontopolar volume and BMI. In males who did not experience childhood abuse, baseline BMI was significantly associated with frontopolar volume at follow-up (up); while in males who did experience childhood abuse, paths existed at both directions (down). d Association between BMI at age 14 years and frontopolar volumetric change between age 14 and 19; these analyses based on longitudinal designs indicated the interaction between the frontopolar volume at age 14 years and childhood abuse contributed to explaining weight gain. NoCA, no childhood abuse; CA, childhood abuse; BMI, body mass index