Literature DB >> 33053697

C4-Alkylamination of C4-Halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles Using Pd(dba)2 or CuI.

Yoshihide Usami1, Yuya Tatsui1, Hiroki Yoneyama1, Shinya Harusawa1.   

Abstract

Alkylamino coupling reactions at the C4 positions of 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles were investigated using palladium or copper catalysts. The Pd(dba)2 catalyzed C-N coupling reaction of aryl- or alkylamines, lacking a β-hydrogen atom, proceeded smoothly using tBuDavePhos as a ligand. As a substrate, 4-Bromo-1-tritylpyrazole was more effective than 4-iodo or chloro-1-tritylpyrazoles. Meanwhile, the CuI mediated C-N coupling reactions of 4-iodo-1H-1-tritylpyrazole were effective for alkylamines possessing a β-hydrogen atom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-halopyrazole; Buchwald-Hartwig coupling; CuI mediated coupling; Pd(dba)2; aliphatic amine; amination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33053697      PMCID: PMC7594063          DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Synthetic methodologies towards a range of substituted pyrazoles have been developed, as they commonly exhibit bioactivities such as antin class="Disease">tumor, antiviral, and antifungal activities. Furthermore, the synthetic study of pyrazoles provides diverse building blocks for the discovery of new drugs, biological probes, herbicides, and other new useful materials [1,2,3]. Therefore, introduction of various functional groups at specific positions on a pyrazole ring is an important and attractive endeavor in synthetic organic chemistry. In particular, the synthesis of C4-aminated pyrazoles has become a prominent research topic, due to the important bioactivities exhibited by this compound class, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Examples of bioactive 4-aminopyrazoles (a–i).

Simple 4-alkylaminopyrazoles (a and b) have been reported to exhibit weak inhibitory activities against n class="Species">horse lever alcohol dehydrogenase (LADH) [4,5]. Azaisoindolinone derivative (c) exhibits potent lipid kinase phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ (PI3Kγ) inhibition, with the distinct advantage of being orally administered and central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant [6]. Two 4-heteroarylamidopyrazoles (d and e) have been presented as apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK 1) inhibitors [7]. 1-Acetoanilide-4-aminopyrazole-substituted quinazoles are selective Aurora B protein kinase inhibitors with potent anti-tumor activity, and structure f is the most potent among them. The 3-aminopyrazole analog of compound f is AZD1152, which was the first Aurora B selective inhibitor to enter clinical trials [8]. 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-based 4-amino-(1H)-pyrazole derivative (g) and pyrimidine-based 4-amino-(1H)-pyrazole derivatives (h and i) are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Specifically, compound i, a dual inhibitor of JAK and histone deacetylase (HDAC), comprises a zinc-binding moiety (HONHCO) linked to the pyrazole N1, via a (CH2)5-aliphatic chain [9,10]. The well-known and widely utilized Buchwald-Hartwig coupling reaction is one of the most powerful methods for the amination of aromatic rings. Moreover, the applicability and efficiency of the reaction are continually being improved with the design and development of efficient n class="Chemical">palladium catalysts, precatalysts, and bulky ligands. Numerous combinations of catalysts and ligands exist that are suitable for specific coupling reactions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In spite of such developments, there have been only a few reports of Buchwald-Hartwig coupling at the C4 position of pyrazoles. In 2011, the first example involving the C4 coupling of n class="Chemical">pyrazoles with aromatic amines was reported by Buchwald, as shown in Scheme 1, Equation (1) [19]. In the following year, the same group described the amidation of five-membered heterocycles with aromatic amides, wherein three examples using 1-benzyl-4-bromopyrazoles and one example using 4-bromo-1-methylpyrazole were reported (Equation (2)) [20]. In their subsequent study on the amination of unprotected five-membered bromoheterocycles, Pd-catalyzed coupling reactions of 4-bromopyrazole with eleven aromatic amines, as well as one benzylic amine, were disclosed (Equation (3)) [21]. Recently, Buchwald et al. described visible-light-mediated amination of aryl halides in the presence of nickel and photoredox catalysts, for which one example of the reaction between 1-benzyl-4-bromopyrazole and pyrrolidine was included (Equation (4)) [22].
Scheme 1

Preceding studies on C4-amino-functionalization of 4-bromo-1H-pyrazoles.

In the course of our continuing studies on the functionalization at the C4 position of n class="Chemical">pyrazoles, we recently reported the synthesis of pyrazole-containing heterobicyclic molecules via ring-closing metathesis [23,24]. Our engagement in pyrazole chemistry has been focused on metal-catalyzed coupling reactions, such as Kumada-Tamao, Suzuki-Miyaura, and Sonogashira couplings, and the Heck-Mizoroki reaction [25,26,27,28]; while the Buchwald-Hartwig coupling reaction for the C4 amination of pyrazoles has remained unchallenged. Encouraged by the above-mentioned successful results, our interest has shifted to Buchwald coupling between 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles and alkyl amines, which has not been investigated in detail, with readily accessible palladium or copper catalysts, such as bis(benzylideneacetone) palladium(0) (Pd(dba)2), or copper (I) iodide (CuI). Herein, we report C4-alkylamino coupling reactions using Pd(dba)2 or CuI with 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Pd(dba)2-Catalyzed Buchwald-Hartwig Coupling for C4-Amination of 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles

First, we investigated the Buchwald-Hartwig coupling between 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles (1) and n class="Chemical">piperidine, as a representative secondary amine [16], in order to determine the optimum reaction conditions. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Buchwald-Hartwig coupling between 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles (1) and piperidine.

Entry aSubstratePd CatalystLigand dSolventTemperature (°C)TimeYield 2a (%)
11I: X = IPd(dba)2 L1 xylene160 (MW b)10 min0
2 1I Pd(dba)2 L2 xylene160 (MW)10 min0
3 1I Pd(dba)2 L3 xylene160 (MW)10 min0
4 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene160 (MW)10 min21
5 1I PdCl2 L4 xylene160 (MW)10 min9
6 1I Pd(OAc)2 L4 xylene160 (MW)10 min20
7 1I PEPPSI-IPr L4 xylene160 (MW)10 min13
8 c 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene160 (MW)10 min52
9 c 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 toluene160 (MW)10 min30
10 c 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 mesitylene160 (MW)10 min49
11 c 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 1,4-dioxane160 (MW)10 min32
12 c 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 THF160 (MW)10 min0
13 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 xylenert24 h7
14 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene6024 h19
15 1I Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene9024 h48
161Br: X = BrPd(dba)2 L4 xylene9024 h60
171Cl: X = ClPd(dba)2 L4 xylene9024 h40
18 1Br Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene7024 h43
19 1Br Pd(dba)2 L4 xylene14024 h23

a. general reaction conditions: substrate (50 mg, 0.13 mmol); solvent (2 mL), others are seen in the scheme in this table. b. MW: microwave, c. 40 mol% of L4 was used. d.

As the Buchwald–Hartwig coupling reaction for 4-halo-1H-pyrazoles requires high temperatures (>80 °C) as well as prolonged time [19,20,21], we utilized microwave (MW) apparatus to expedite the experimental process. Ligand screening was performed with the fixed conditions of n class="Chemical">4-iodo-1H-1-tritylpyrazole (1 X = I), Pd(dba)2, xylene, 160 °C, and 10 min under MW irradiation (entries 1–4). In the case of commonly used bidentate ligands, namely 1,1’-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf, L1), 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe, L2), and 2,2’-bis(diphenylphosphino)diphenyl ether (DPEPhos, L3), the reaction did not proceed (entries 1–3), while with the use of the bulky BuDavePhos ligand (L4) the desired coupled product 2a was obtained in 21% yield; hence L4 was deemed a suitable ligand for this coupling reaction (entry 4). The use of L4 with palladium(II) chloride (PdCl2), palladium(II) acetate (Pd(OAc)2), or pyridine-enhanced precatalyst preparation stabilization and initiation-isopropyl (PEPPSI-IPr) catalysts did not improve the yield of 2a (entries 5–7). Although increasing the amount of L4 to 40 mol% yielded 52% of 2a, this created an additional problem for the purification of 2a (entry 8). Solvent screening with the use of L4 (40 mol%) did not improve results upon that of entry 8 (entries 9–12). Prolonged reaction time (24 h) with L4 (20 mol%) at room temperature (rt) under MW irradiation gave 2a in only 7% yield (entry 13). Conducting the reaction at 60 °C and 90 °C afforded 2a in 19% and 48% yields, respectively (entries 14 and 15). Alternatively, when 4-bromo- and 4-chloropyrazoles (1: X = Br and 1: X = Cl) were used as substrates at 90 °C for 24 h (entries 16 and 17), the 4-bromo analogue delivered the highest yield of 2a (60%) (entry 16). Reaction conditions using bromo compound 1 at lower or higher temperatures (70 or 140 °C in a sealed reaction vial) delivered inferior results compared to that of entry 16 (entries 18 and 19). Based on these results, further experiments were performed employing the reaction conditions listed in entry 16. Next, optimized reaction conditions were applied to various n class="Chemical">amines, and the results are summarized in Table 2. Reactions of 1 (X=Br) with piperidine and morpholine afforded desired products 2a and 2b in 60% and 67% yields, respectively (entries 1 and 2), while the reactions with pyrrolidine and allylamine afforded 2c (7%) and 2d (6%) in low yields (entries 3 and 4). The coupling reactions of 1 with various primary amines produced the corresponding 4-alkylaminopyrazoles 2e–g, 2k, and 2l in low yields (17–34%) (entries 5–8, 11, and 12). Meanwhile, in the cases of isopropylamine and benzylamine, the desired products 2i and 2j were not obtained (entries 9 and 10). The reactions of 1 with adamantylamine or tert-butylamine afforded the corresponding products 2m and 2n in 90% and 53% yields, respectively (entries 13 and 14). Furthermore, reactions with aromatic amines (anilines and 1-naphtylamine) gave the corresponding 2o (94%), 2p (91%), and 2q (85%) in high yields (entries 15–17) as being analogous to Buchwald’s findings [21]. As the reaction with diphenylamine afforded 2r in 45% yield, we surmised that bulkiness at the reaction center depresses the chemical yield (entry 18).
Table 2

Buchwald-Hartwig coupling of 4-bromo-1H-1-tritylpyrazole (1) with various amines.

Entry.AmineProductYield (%)
1piperidine2a: R = R’ = -CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2-60
2morpholine2b: R = R’ = -CH2CH2OCH2CH2-67
3pyrrolidine2c: R = R’ = -CH2CH2CH2CH2-7
4allylamine2d: R = CH2CH=CH2, R’ = H6
5n-propylamine2e: R = CH2CH2CH3, R’ = H24
6n-butylamine2f: R = CH2CH2CH2CH3, R’ = H17
7isobutylamine2g: R = CH2CH(CH3)2, R’ = H28
8isoamylamine2h: R = CH2CH2CH(CH3)2, R’ = H20
9isopropylamine2i: R = CH(CH3)2, R’ = H0
10PhCH2NH22j: R = CH2Ph, R’ = H0
11PhCH2CH2NH22k: R = CH2CH2Ph, R’ = H30
12PhCH2CH2CH2NH22l: R = CH2CH2CH2Ph, R’ = H34
13 aadamantylamine2m: R = adamantyl, R’ = H90
14 atert-butylamine2n: R = CH(CH3)3, R’ = H53
15 aaniline2o: R = Ph, R’ = H94
16 a2-methoxyaniline2p: R = 2-MeOPh, R’ = H91
17 a1-naphthylamine2q: R = naphth-1-yl, R’ = H85
18 aN,N-diphenylamine2r: R = R’ = Ph45

a. Entries 13–18 were performed with 1.1 equivalents of amine.

Reactions of 1 with pyrrolidine, allylamine, or primary amines bearing a β-hydrogen atom resulted in low yields (entries 3–12), while amines lacking a β-hydrogen afforded good yields (entries 13–18). These contrasting results are likely due to β-elimination occurring in the palladium complex during the coupling process.

2.2. CuI-Catalyzed Coupling for C4-Amination of 4-Halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles

Copper-catalyzed C-N coupling reactions have been extensively studied [29], and Buchwald has reportedly implemented this type of reaction using n class="Chemical">bromo- or iodobenzenes as substrates progressively, but not with five-membered heterocyclic compounds such as pyrazoles [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. As the C-N coupling reaction of 4-halopyrazoles 1 with allyl- or alkylamines bearing β-hydrogen atoms revealed low reactivities in the above investigation (Table 2, entries 4–12), the copper-catalyzed reaction of 1 was further studied. For this purpose, the reaction of allylamine with n class="Chemical">4-iodopyrazole 1 (X = I), which could be got easier than 4-bromopyrazole, was investigated, as presented in Table 3. First, the reaction was performed using the conditions similar to those used in Buchwald’s procedure [32]: CuI (5 mol%), 2-isobutyrylcyclohexanone (L5: 20 mol%) as the ligand, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 100 °C, 24 h, and t-BuOK (2 eq). Although the desired 4-allylaminopyrazole 2d was obtained in only 17% yield (entry 1), increasing the amount of CuI from 5 to 20 mol% improved the chemical yield of 2d to 72% (entry 2). The use of 2-acetylcyclohexanone (L6) as an alternative ligand, which is nearly 10-fold cheaper than L5, afforded a good yield (68%, entry 3), while the use of 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (L7) resulted in a poor yield (12%, entry 4). Hence, L6 was applied in the following experiments (entries 5–15 in Table 3). The reaction temperature was varied in entries 5–7, however 100 °C proved optimal (entry 3). Furthermore, various copper catalysts were investigated in entries 9–13, and it was found that the use of the high-cost (CuOTf)2·C6H6 catalyst (entry 13) furnished a comparable yield (70%) to that of CuI (72%) (entry 2). In addition, while the use of 4-bromopyrazole 1 (X = Br) provided 2i in 66% yield (entry 14), chloropyrazole 1 (X = Cl) did not react (entry 15).
Table 3

CuI-catalyzed allylamination of 4-halo-1H-1-tritylpyrazoles 1.

Entry aSubstrateCu CatalystLigand cTemperature (°C)Yield 2d (%)
1 b1I: X = ICuI L5 10017
2 1I CuI L5 10072
3 1I CuI L6 10068
4 1I CuI L7 10012
5 1I CuI L6 rt0
6 1I CuI L6 7041
7 1I CuI L6 1309
8 1I CuI L6 10052
9 1I CuI2 L6 10057
10 1I Cu(OAc)2 L6 10058
11 1I Cu2O L6 10016
12 1I CuCT L6 10050
13 1I [CuOTf]2.C6H6 L6 10070
141Br: X = BrCuI L6 10066
151Cl: X = ClCuI L6 1000

a. general reaction conditions: substrate (50 mg, 0.12 mmol); solvent (2 mL), others are seen in the scheme in this table. b. CuI (5 mol%), L5 (20 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2.0 Equation). c.

Therefore, to evaluate the scope of this transformation, additional coupling reactions between iodopyrazole 1 and various n class="Chemical">amines were performed, by applying the optimized reaction conditions (entry 3 of Table 3), as shown in Table 4. It should be noted that there were a number of distinct contrasts between the outcomes of the CuI-catalyzed (Table 4) and those of the Pd-catalyzed coupling reactions (Table 2). In the case of CuI coupling, reactions of 1i with piperidine and morpholine afforded 2a and 2b (21% and 22%, respectively) in lower yields (Table 4, entries 1 and 2) than those obtained (60% and 67%, respectively) in the corresponding Pd-catalyzed reaction of 1 (entries 1 and 2 in Table 2). The CuI catalyst provided the pyrrolidine derivative 2c in 43% yield (Table 4, entry 3), while the Pd catalyst yielded 2c in only 7% yield (Table 2, entry 3). CuI-catalyzed reactions with primary alkylamines gave moderate to good yields of products 2d–2l (entries 4–12), while reactions with adamantyl, tert-butyl, and aromatic amines did not afford the desired products (entries 13–17), and only aniline furnished a low yield of 2o (15%) (entry 15); these trends were reversed in the case of Pd-catalyzed processes. These negative results may be ascribed to the increase in bulkiness as well as a decrease in the basicity of the amine sources.
Table 4

CuI-catalyzed coupling of 1 with various amines.

EntryAmineProductYield (%)
1piperidine 2a 21
2morpholine 2b 22
3pyrrolidine 2c 43
4allylamine 2d 68
5n-propylamine 2e 75
6n-butylamine 2f 62
7isobutylamine 2g 70
8isoamylamine 2h 62
9isopropylamine 2i 57
10PhCH2NH2 2j 55
11Ph CH2CH2NH2 2k 53
12Ph CH2 CH2CH2NH2 2l 69
13adamantylamine 2m 0
14tert-butylamine 2n 0
15aniline 2o 15
161-naphthylamine 2q 0
17N,N-diphenylamine 2r 0

3. Conclusions

We have studied the C4 amination of pyrazole derivatives using readily accessible n class="Gene">Pd(dba)2 or CuI catalysts. The Pd(dba)2-catalyzed reaction of 4-bromo-1H-1-tritylpyrazole proved to be suitable for aromatic or bulky amines lacking β-hydrogen atoms, but not for cyclic amines (piperidine and morpholine); additionally it was not suitable for alkylamines possessing β-hydrogen atoms. On the other hand, the CuI-catalyzed amination using 4-iodo-1H-1-tritylpyrazole was revealed to be favorable for alkylamines possessing β-hydrogen atoms, and not suitable for aromatic amines and bulky amines lacking β-hydrogens, indicating the complementarity of the two catalysts. Although further improvements are required for practical synthesis, such as the reduction of catalyst or ligand loading, the findings of the present study offer a useful synthetic method for the construction of 4-functionalized pyrazoles. Further application of the methodology developed in this study to the C-O coupling reaction of halopyrazoles with alkylated alcohols will be evaluated and reported in the near future.

4. Materials and Methods

General: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded at 27 °C on an Agilent 400-MR-DD2 spectrometer (Agilent Tech., Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in CDCl3 with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. Abbreviations for splitting patterns in 1H-NMR spectra are noted as d = doublet; t = triplet; q = quartet; quin = quintet; sept = septet. Electron impact-high-resolution mass spectra (EI-HRMS) were measured with a JEOL JMS-700 (2) mass spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Melting points were determined on a Yanagimoto micromelting point apparatus and were uncorrected. Liquid column chromatography was conducted with silica gel (FL-60D, Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd., Kasugai, Aichi, Japan). Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel 70 F254 plates (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Tokyo, Japan), and compounds were detected by dipping the plates into an EtOH solution of phosphomolybdic acid followed by heating. MW-aided reactions were carried out in a Biotage Initiator® reactor (PartnerTech Atvidaberg AB for Biotage Sweden AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Pd(dba)2, mesitylene, dppf (L2), copper (I) thiophene-2-carboxylate (CuCT), piperidine, pyrrolidine, allylamine, n-propylamine, isobutylamine, isoamylamine, isopropylamine, benzylamine, 2-phenylethylamine, 3-phenylpropylamine, adamantylamine, tert-butylamine, aniline, 2-methoxyaniline, 1-naphthylamine, and N,N-diphenylamine were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI) Co. (Tokyo, Japan). BuOK, CuI, and 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (L7) were purchased from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). Dry xylene, THF, 1,4-dioxane, and DMF were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co. (Osaka, Japan). PEPSI-IPr, dppf (L1), DEPPhos (L3), BuDavePhos (L4), morpholine, 2-isobutyrylcyclohexanone (L5), and 2-acetylcyclohexanone (L6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC (St. Louis, MI, USA). Palladium-catalyzed coupling reaction with 1 and amines (Table 1 and Table 2) Typical procedure (Table 1, entry 16): To a solution of 1 (50.0 mg, 1.28 × 10−1 mmol) in xylene (2 mL) in a MW vial were added BuDavePhos (8.8 mg, 2.56 × 10−2 mmol, 20 mol%), n class="Gene">Pd(dba)2 (7.4 mg, 1. 28 × 10−2 mmol, 10 mol%), potassium t-butoxide (BuOK) (28.8 mg, 2.57 × 10−1 mmol, 2.0 Equation) and piperidine (0.03 mL, 2.57 × 10−1 mmol, 2.0 Equation). The reaction vial was sealed and heated at 90 °C with stirring in an oil bath for 24 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of sat. aq. NH4Cl (1 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (1 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated to give a crude residue, which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: Hexane/AcOEt = 4:1) to afford 1-(1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)piperidine (2a) (30.9 mg, 60%) as a white powder. CuI-catalyzed coupling reaction with 1 and amines (Table 3 and Table 4) Typical procedure (Table 3, entry 3); To a solution of 1 (50.0 mg, 1.15 × 10−1 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) in a MW vial, were added n class="Chemical">2-acetylcyclohexanone (3.0 μL, 2.30 × 10−2 mmol, 20 mol%), CuI (4.4 mg, 2.30 × 10−2 mmol, 20 mol%), BuOK (25.7 mg, 2.30 × 10−1 mmol, 2.0 Equation) and allylamine (0.03 mL, 2.30 × 10−1 mmol, 2.0 Equation). The reaction vial was sealed and heated at 100 °C with stirring in an oil bath for 24 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of sat. aq. NH4Cl (1 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (1 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated to give a crude residue, which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: Hexane/AcOEt = 4:1) to afford 2d (28.6 mg, 68%). 1-(1-Trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)piperidine (2a): white powder; mp 170–174 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.49 (2H, quin, J = 5.7 Hz, -CH2CH2CH2-), 1.64 (4H, quin, J = 5.7 Hz, -CH2CH2CH2), 2.83 (4H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, -NCH2CH2) 6.88 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz, pyrazole-H), 7.13–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.28–7.31 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.39 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 23.9, 25.5, 52.4, 78.4, 118.9, 127.5, 127.6, 129.5, 130.1, 137.7, 143.4; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C27H27N3 (M+) 393.2205, found 393.2210. 4-(1-Trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)morpholine (2b): white powder; mp 209–211 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.87 (4H, t, J = 4.7 Hz, -NCH2CH2), 3.78 (4H, t, J = 4.7 Hz, -OCH2CH2-), 6.90 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.17 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.27–7.30 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.39 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 51.4, 66.5, 78.5, 118.8, 127.7, 129.0, 130.1, 136.9, 143.3 (two signals are overlapping to give one signal ); EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C25H25N3O (M+) 395.1996, found 395.1997. 4-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)-1-trityl-1H-pyrazole (2c): white powder; mp 189–190 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.90 (4H, br t, J = 6.5 Hz, -NCH2CH2-), 2.99 (4H, t, J = 6.5 Hz, -NCH2CH2), 6.74 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz, pyrazole-H), 7.16–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.25–7.30 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.7, 51.0, 78.3, 116.9, 127.5, 127.6, 128.2, 130.1, 135.1, 143.5; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C26H25N3 (M+) 379.2049, found 379.2048. N-Allyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2d): oil; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.53 (2H, dt, J = 5.7, 1.6 Hz, -NHCH2CH=CH2), 5.09–5.12 (1H, dq, J = 10.1, 1.4 Hz, -NHCH2CH=CHH), 5.16–5.21 (1H, dq, J = 17.1, 1.6 Hz, -NHCH2CH=CHH), 5.86–5.96 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 10.1, 5.7 Hz, -NHCH2CH=CH2), 6.88 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz, pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.25–7.30 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.32 (1H, d, J = 0.8, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 50.5, 78.3, 116.3, 119.2, 127.6, 129.9, 130.1, 132.3, 135.8, 143. 4; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C25H23N3 (M+) 365.1892, found 365.1892. N-Propyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2e): white powder; mp 145–148 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.94 (3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, -NHCH2CH2CH3), 1.56 (2H, sext, J = 7.4 Hz, -NHCH2CH2CH3), 2.86 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, -NHCH2CH2CH3), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz, pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.20 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.26–7.35 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.6, 23.0, 49.7, 78.2, 118.7, 127.5, 127.6, 129.7, 130.1, 132.9, 143.5; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C25H25N3 (M+) 367.2048, found 367.2049. N-Butyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2f): white amorhous; mp 112–116 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.91 (3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, -CH2CH3-), 1.36 (2H, br sext, J = 7.4 Hz, -CH2CH2CH3), 1.52 (2H, br quint, J = 7.4 Hz, -CH2CH2CH2-),2.89 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, -NHCH2CH2-), 6.86 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.19 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.27–7.33 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.0, 20.2, 32.0, 47.6, 78.2, 118.7, 127.5, 127.6, 129.7, 130.1, 132.9, 143.4 EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C26H27N3 (M+) 381.2205, found 381.2215. N-Isobutyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2g): white powder; mp 135–136 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.93 (6H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, -NHCH2CH(CH3)2), 1.78 (1H, nonet, J = 6.6 Hz, -NHCH2CH(CH3)2), 2.70 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, -NHCH2CH(CH3)2), 6.85 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.11–7.19 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.25–7.32 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.5, 28.4, 55.7, 78.2, 118.4, 127.5, 127.6, 129.6, 130.1, 133.1, 143.5; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C26H27N3 (M+) 381.2205, found 381.2210. N-Isoamyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2h): white amorphous; mp 110–113 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.89 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, -CH(CH3)2), 1.48 (2H, q, J = 7.4 Hz, -CH2CH2CH-), 1.64 (1H, nonet, J = 6.6 Hz, -CH2CH(CH3)2), 2.89 (2H, br t, J = 7.3 Hz, -NHCH2CH2-), 6.86 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.15–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.26–7.32 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 22.6, 25.9, 38.9, 46.0, 78.3, 118.7, 127.5, 127.6, 129.7, 130.1, 132.9, 143.5; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C27H29N3 (M+) 395.2361, found 395.2359. N-Isopropyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2i): white powder; mp 130–133 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.11 (6H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, -NHCH(CH3)2), 3.18 (1H, sept, J = 6.3 Hz, -NHCH(CH3)2), 6.88 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.15–7.19 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.26–7.35 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 23.0, 48.4, 78.2, 120.5, 127.5, 127.6, 130.1, 131.1, 143.4 (two carbon signals overlapped); EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C25H25N3 (M+) 367.2048, found 367.2046 N-Benzyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2j): white powder; mp 148–151 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.06 (2H, s, -CH2Ph), 6.84 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.13–7.16 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.24–7.30 (14H, m, Ph-H), 7.32 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ52.2, 78.3, 119.2, 127.2, 127.5, 127.6, 127.9, 128.5, 129.9, 130.1, 132.4, 139.4, 143.4; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C29H25N3 (M+) 415.2048, found 415.2046. N-Phenethyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2k): white powder; mp 134–137 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.84 (2H, t, J = 6.9 Hz, -NHCH2CH2Ph), 3.16 (2H, t, J = 6.9 Hz, -NHCH2CH2Ph), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 0.9 Hz, pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.32 (21H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 35.8, 48.9, 78.3, 119.0, 126.4, 127.5, 127.6, 128.6, 128.8, 129.8, 130.1, 132.3, 139.3, 143.4; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C30H27N3 (M+) 429.2205, found 429.2200. N-(3-Phenyl)propyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2l): white powder; mp 114–117 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.86 (2H, br quint, J = 7.3 Hz, -CH2CH2 CH2-), 2.67 (2H, br t, J = 7.5 Hz, -CH2CH2Ph), 2.94 (2H, t, J = 7.1 Hz, -NHCH2CH2-), 6.84 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.14–19 (8H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H), 7.24–7.30 (13H, m, Ph-H, and pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 31.4, 33.3, 47.4, 78.3, 118.8, 125.9, 127.5, 127.6, 128.3, 128.4, 129.8, 130.1, 132.6, 141.8, 143.4; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C31H29N3 (M+) 443.2362, found 443.2365. N-((3s,5s,7s)-Adamantan-1-yl)-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2m): white powder; mp 204–205 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.59 (12H, m, Ad-H), 2.05 (4H, br n, Ad-H, and -NHAd), 7.00 (1H, s, pyrazole), 7.14–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.28–7.30 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.34 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.6, 36.4, 43.2, 51.7, 78.3, 125.4, 127.2, 127.5, 127.6, 130.1, 136.8, 143.3; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C32H33N3 (M+) 459.2674, found 459.2673. N-(tert-Butyl)-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2n): white powder; mp 137–140 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.11 (9H, s, -C(CH3)3), 7.01 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.15–7.18 (6H, m, Ph-H), 7.28–7.30 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.36 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.5, 51.9, 78.3, 126.7, 127.0, 127.5, 127.6, 130.1, 136.2, 143.3; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C26H27N3 (M+) 381.2205, found 381.2206. N-Phenyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2o): white powder; mp 191–192 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.05 (1H, br, -NHPh), 6.70–6.76 (3H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H), 7.14–7.20 (7H, m, Ph-H), 7.24–7.32 (11H, m,Ph-H), 7.61 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 78.8, 113.4, 118.5, 123.5, 127.2, 127.8, 129.3, 130.0, 130.1, 136.0, 143.1, 146.6; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C28H23N3 (M+) 401.1892, found 401.1890. N-(o-Methoxy)phenyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2p): white powder; mp 133–136 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.87 (3H, s, -OCH3), 5.70 (1H, br, -NHAr), 6.70–6.76 (1H, m, Ph-H), 6.82–6.84 (2H, m, Ph-H), 7.22–7.25 (8H, m, Ph-H), 7.32–7.68 (9H, m, Ph-H, pyrazole-H), 7.68 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 55.4, 78.6, 109.8, 110.9, 117.6, 121.1, 123.3, 126.6, 127.6, 130.1, 135.7, 136.2, 143.1, 146.5; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C29H25N3 (M+) 431.1998, found 431.1998. N-(Naphthalen-1-yl)-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2q): white powder; mp 175–178 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.66 (1H, s, -NH-naphthyl), 6.82–6.84 (1H, m, naphtyl-H), 7.21–7.26 (8H, m, Ph-H and naphthyl-H), 7.28–7.36 (9H, m, Ph-H), 7.39 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.43–7.48 (2H, m, naphthyl-H), 7.69 (1H, s, pyrazole-H), 7.79–7.87 (2H, m, naphthyl-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 78.8, 106.9, 118.9, 119.8, 123.4, 123.6, 125.1, 125.9, 126.3, 127.6, 127.8, 128.7, 130.1, 130.4, 134.4, 136.4, 142.2, 143.1; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C32H25N3 (M+) 451.2049, found 451.2052. N,N-Diphenyl-1-trityl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (2r): white powder; mp 175–177 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ6.92 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, Ph-H), 7.04–7.06 (4H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H), 7.16–7.22 (10H, m, Ph-H), 7.29–7.33 (10H, m, Ph-H and pyrazole-H), 7.52 (1H, s, pyrazole-H); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 78.9, 121.5, 121.9, 127.7, 127.9, 127.74, 127.78, 127.8, 128.6, 129.1, 129.2, 130.1, 130.2, 137.1, 143.0, 147.7; EI-HRMS m/z calcd. for C34H27N3 (M+) 477.2205, found 477.2197.
  21 in total

1.  A bulky biaryl phosphine ligand allows for palladium-catalyzed amidation of five-membered heterocycles as electrophiles.

Authors:  Mingjuan Su; Stephen L Buchwald
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling of Functionalized Primary and Secondary Amines with Aryl and Heteroaryl Halides: Two Ligands Suffice in Most Cases.

Authors:  Debabrata Maiti; Brett P Fors; Jaclyn L Henderson; Yoshinori Nakamura; Stephen L Buchwald
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  Synthetic inhibitors of alcohol dehydrogenase. Pyrazoles containing polar groups directly attached to the pyrazole ring in the 4-position.

Authors:  B R Tolf; R Dahlbom; A Akeson; H Theorell
Journal:  Acta Pharm Suec       Date:  1985

Review 4.  The Buchwald-Hartwig Amination After 25 Years.

Authors:  Ruth Dorel; Christian P Grugel; Alexander M Haydl
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Design, Synthesis, and Antitumor Evaluation of 4-Amino-(1H)-pyrazole Derivatives as JAKs Inhibitors.

Authors:  Xuewu Liang; Jie Zang; Mengyuan Zhu; Qianwen Gao; Binghe Wang; Wenfang Xu; Yingjie Zhang
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 6.  Selected Copper-Based Reactions for C-N, C-O, C-S, and C-C Bond Formation.

Authors:  Subhajit Bhunia; Govind Goroba Pawar; S Vijay Kumar; Yongwen Jiang; Dawei Ma
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Synthesis and SAR of 1-acetanilide-4-aminopyrazole-substituted quinazolines: selective inhibitors of Aurora B kinase with potent anti-tumor activity.

Authors:  Kevin M Foote; Andrew A Mortlock; Nicola M Heron; Frédéric H Jung; George B Hill; Georges Pasquet; Madeleine C Brady; Stephen Green; Simon P Heaton; Sarah Kearney; Nicholas J Keen; Rajesh Odedra; Stephen R Wedge; Robert W Wilkinson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Pd-catalyzed amination reactions of aryl halides using bulky biarylmonophosphine ligands.

Authors:  Ryan A Altman; Brett P Fors; Stephen L Buchwald
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Evolution of a fourth generation catalyst for the amination and thioetherification of aryl halides.

Authors:  John F Hartwig
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Palladium-catalyzed amination of unprotected five-membered heterocyclic bromides.

Authors:  Mingjuan Su; Naoyuki Hoshiya; Stephen L Buchwald
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 6.005

View more
  1 in total

1.  Approaches to the Synthesis of Dicarboxylic Derivatives of Bis(pyrazol-1-yl)alkanes.

Authors:  Nikita P Burlutskiy; Andrei S Potapov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.