| Literature DB >> 33053638 |
Jingqi Song1, Ji Zhang1, Wafaie Fawzi2, Yangmu Huang1.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the impact of a wide range of demographic, socioeconomic, and community factors on the double burden of malnutrition among women of reproductive age using longitudinal data. We used data about 11,348 women of reproductive age who participated in the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), a longitudinal survey, between 1989 and 2015. Nutritional outcomes were categorized into four groups, namely underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity, with normal weight as reference. A multinomial logit model was fitted due to geographic clustering and repeated observations of individuals. The prevalence of underweight decreased over time from 1991 but has tended to rise again since 2004, while the prevalence of overweight/obesity continued to rise between 1991 and 2015. Improved individual factors, socioeconomic status, and community urbanization reduced the risk of underweight but elevated the risk of overweight and obesity. The medium levels, rather than the highest levels, of household income and community urbanization are associated with a higher risk of overweight and obesity. The notable increase in underweight prevalence is a cause for concern to be addressed along with efforts to curb the rising tide of overweight. In order to enhance the nutritional status of women of reproductive age, it is essential to improving the community environment, levels of education, and living environment from a wider context. Long-term and targeted plans are urgently needed for nutrition improvements among the different populations.Entities:
Keywords: determinants; malnutrition; women of reproductive age
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33053638 PMCID: PMC7601850 DOI: 10.3390/nu12103102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Trends of body mass index (BMI) among women of reproductive age by survey year.
Distribution of women of reproductive age across four categories of malnutrition by different predictors from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) 1991–2015.
| Variables | Total | Underweight | Normal | Overweight | Obese | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size ( | 24,606 | 1926 (7.8) | 13,209 (53.7) | 7697(31.3) | 1774 (7.2) | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 35.2 (8.8) | 30.0 (9.9) | 33.6 (9.3) | 38.3 (7.9) | 40.0 (7.0) | <0.0001 |
| Marriage status ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Single | 3950 (16.1) | 742 (38.5) | 2579 (19.5) | 560 (7.3) | 69 (3.9) | |
| Married | 20,093 (81.7) | 1146 (59.5) | 10,335 (78.2) | 6965 (90.5) | 1647 (92.8) | |
| Divorced/widowed/separated | 563 (2.3) | 38 (1.96) | 295 (2.2) | 172 (2.2) | 58 (3.3) | |
| Education ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Illiterate or primary | 3816 (15.5) | 205 (10.6) | 2004 (15.2) | 1314 (17.1) | 293 (16.5) | |
| Primary graduates or junior school | 14,109 (57.3) | 1083 (56.2) | 7412 (56.1) | 4501 (58.5) | 1113 (62.7) | |
| High school or vocational school | 4919 (20.0) | 449 (23.3) | 2770 (21.0) | 1420 (18.5) | 280 (15.8) | |
| University or above | 1762 (7.2) | 189 (9.8) | 1023 (7.7) | 462 (6.0) | 88 (4.94) | |
| Nationality ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Han | 21,599 (87.8) | 1653 (85.8) | 11,512 (87.2) | 6850 (89.0) | 1584 (89.3) | |
| Others | 3007 (12.2) | 273 (14.2) | 1697 (12.8) | 847 (11.0) | 190 (10.7) | |
| Medical insurance ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| No | 12,985 (52.8) | 1127 (58.5) | 7543 (57.1) | 3630 (47.2) | 685 (38.6) | |
| Yes | 11,621 (47.2) | 799 (41.5) | 5666 (42.9) | 4067 (52.8) | 1089 (61.4) | |
| Household income per capita ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Lowest | 8310 (33.8) | 753 (39.1) | 4951 (37.5) | 2207 (28.7) | 399 (22.5) | |
| Middle | 9022 (36.7) | 652 (33.9) | 4726 (35.8) | 2965 (38.5) | 679 (38.3) | |
| Highest | 7274 (29.6) | 521 (27.1) | 3532 (26.7) | 2525 (32.8) | 696 (39.2) | |
| Residency ( | <.0001 | |||||
| Urban | 8185 (33.3) | 690 (35.8) | 4239 (32.1) | 2663 (34.6) | 593 (33.4) | |
| Rural | 16,421 (66.7) | 1236 (64.2) | 8970 (67.9) | 5034 (65.4) | 1181 (66.6) | |
| Region ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Southwest | 6087 (24.7) | 716 (37.2) | 3546 (26.9) | 1543 (20.1) | 282 (15.9) | |
| Northeast | 4368 (17.8) | 264 (13.7) | 2109 (16.0) | 1541 (20.0) | 454 (25.6) | |
| Central | 8451 (34.4) | 617 (32.0) | 4680 (35.4) | 2618 (34.0) | 536 (30.2) | |
| Coastal | 5700 (23.2) | 329 (17.1) | 2874 (21.8) | 1995 (25.9) | 502 (28.3) | |
| Urban index ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| Lowest | 8757 (35.6) | 701 (36.4) | 5124 (38.8) | 2468 (32.1) | 464 (26.2) | |
| Middle | 8119 (33.0) | 624 (32.4) | 4128 (31.3) | 2683 (34.9) | 684 (38.6) | |
| Highest | 7730 (31.4) | 601 (31.2) | 3957 (30.0) | 2546 (33.1) | 626 (35.3) | |
| Ever smoked ( | 0.0013 | |||||
| No | 24,154 (98.2) | 1892 (98.2) | 13,000 (98.4) | 7537 (97.9) | 1725 (97.2) | |
| Yes | 452 (1.8) | 34 (1.8) | 209 (1.6) | 160 (2.1) | 49 (2.8) | |
| Drinking ( | 0.1498 | |||||
| Never | 22,122 (89.9) | 1755 (91.1) | 11,891 (90.0) | 6883 (89.4) | 1593 (89.8) | |
| Yes | 2484 (10.1) | 171 (8.9) | 1318 (10.0) | 814 (10.6) | 181 (10.2) | |
| Wave ( | <0.0001 | |||||
| 1991 | 3298 (13.4) | 334 (17.3) | 2071 (15.7) | 810 (10.5) | 83 (4.7) | |
| 1993 | 3068 (12.5) | 317 (16.5) | 1869 (14.2) | 782 (10.2) | 100 (5.6) | |
| 1997 | 2893 (11.8) | 219 (11.4) | 1714 (13.0) | 809 (10.5) | 151 (8.5) | |
| 2000 | 2939 (11.9) | 235 (12.2) | 1548 (11.7) | 952 (12.4) | 204 (11.5) | |
| 2004 | 2505 (10.2) | 144 (7.5) | 1304 (9.9) | 856 (11.1) | 201 (11.3) | |
| 2006 | 2354 (9.6) | 146 (7.6) | 1217 (9.2) | 796 (10.3) | 195 (11.0) | |
| 2009 | 2324 (9.4) | 174 (9.0) | 1156 (8.8) | 773 (10.0) | 221 (12.5) | |
| 2011 | 3036 (12.3) | 197 (10.2) | 1413 (10.7) | 1082 (14.1) | 344 (19.4) | |
| 2015 | 2189 (8.9) | 160 (8.3) | 917 (6.9) | 837 (10.9) | 275 (15.5) | |
Chi-squared test or ANOVA for a cross-tabulation between each variable and the four categories of malnutrition.
Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for predictors of unordered multinomial logistic models (using normal BMI as the reference) predicting malnutrition for women of reproductive age from the CHNS, 1991–2015.
| Variable | BMI Level (Reference: Normal BMI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | Overweight | Obesity | ||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Age (years) | 0.955 (0.947–0.962) | <0.0001 | 1.057 (1.052–1.061) | <0.0001 | 1.074 (1.065–1.083) | <0.0001 |
| Marital status (ref: single) | ||||||
| Married | 0.701 (0.602–0.817) | <0.0001 | 1.238 (1.097–1.398) | 0.0007 | 1.460 (1.108–1.923) | 0.009 |
| Divorced/widowed/separated | 0.828 (0.568–1.208) | 0.34 | 0.991 (0.785–1.250) | 0.92 | 1.656 (1.096–2.504) | 0.02 |
| Education (ref: illiterate or primary) | ||||||
| Primary graduates or junior | 0.947 (0.791–1.133) | 0.53 | 1.024 (0.930–1.127) | 0.58 | 0.863 (0.728–1.023) | 0.09 |
| High school or vocational | 1.056 (0.852–1.309) | 0.57 | 0.755 (0.668–0.854) | <0.0001 | 0.476 (0.380–0.595) | <0.0001 |
| University or above | 1.12 (0.843–1.446) | 0.41 | 0.565 (0.475–0.672) | <0.0001 | 0.278 (0.201–0.385) | <0.0001 |
| Nationality (ref: Han) | ||||||
| Others | 0.906 (0.742–1.107) | 0.33 | 1.050 (0.918–1.200) | 0.46 | 1.039 (0.818–1.321) | 0.75 |
| Medical insurance (ref: no) | ||||||
| Yes | 0.960 (0.829–1.112) | 0.54 | 1.127 (1.033–1.229) | 0.002 | 1.077 (0.920–1.261) | 0.38 |
|
| ||||||
| Middle | 0.988 (0.859–1.137) | 0.80 | 1.111 (1.020–1.209) | 0.01 | 1.004 (0.861–1.172) | 0.98 |
| Highest | 1.095 (0.902–1.328) | 0.40 | 1.009 (0.903–1.128) | 0.80 | 0.837 (0.694–1.009) | 0.06 |
| Ever smoked (ref: yes) | ||||||
| Yes | 1.686 (1.144–2.484) | 0.009 | 0.952 (0.760–1.193) | 0.69 | 1.094 (0.772–1.551) | 0.58 |
| Drinking (ref: never) | ||||||
| Yes | 0.901 (0.754–1.076) | 0.27 | 1.011 (0.913–1.120) | 0.82 | 1.070 (0.890–1.287) | 0.53 |
|
| ||||||
| Residency (ref: rural) | ||||||
| Urban | 1.059 (0.885–1.267) | 0.52 | 1.223 (1.072–1.395) | 0.002 | 1.339 (1.027–1.746) | 0.01 |
| Region (ref: southwest) | ||||||
| Central | 0.620 (0.504–0.761) | <0.0001 | 1.334 (1.137–1.566) | 0.0001 | 1.782 (1.277–2.486) | 0.001 |
| Coastal | 0.528 (0.418–0.665) | <0.0001 | 1.598 (1.344–1.900) | <0.0001 | 2.379 (1.669–3.391) | <0.0001 |
| Northeast | 0.642 (0.503–0.819) | 0.0004 | 1.638 (1.362–1.971) | <0.0001 | 2.879 (1.970–4.205) | <0.0001 |
| Urban index (ref: lowest) | ||||||
| Middle | 1.072 (0.920–1.249) | 0.42 | 1.185 (1.075–1.305) | 0.001 | 1.404 (1.17–1.686) | <0.0001 |
| Highest | 1.144 (0.923–1.418) | 0.25 | 1.029 (0.897–1.182) | 0.65 | 1.137 (0.877–1.473) | 0.35 |
| Wave (ref: 1991) | ||||||
| 1993 | 1.058 (0.891–1.257) | 0.40 | 1.011 (0.894–1.143) | 0.84 | 1.196 (0.888–1.613) | 0.34 |
| 1997 | 0.825 (0.673–1.010) | 0.06 | 1.061 (0.929–1.211) | 0.39 | 1.973 (1.472–2.644) | <0.0001 |
| 2000 | 0.999 (0.811–1.231) | 1.00 | 1.364 (1.192–1.561) | <0.0001 | 2.891 (2.169–3.854) | <0.0001 |
| 2004 | 0.842 (0.660–1.074) | 0.18 | 1.293 (1.120–1.493) | 0.000 | 2.995 (2.220–4.041) | <0.0001 |
| 2006 | 0.929 (0.727–1.189) | 0.61 | 1.236 (1.066–1.433) | 0.005 | 3.105 (2.288–4.213) | <0.0001 |
| 2009 | 1.199 (0.926–1.553) | 0.16 | 1.169 (0.994–1.375) | 0.06 | 3.625 (2.627–5.001) | <0.0001 |
| 2011 | 1.101 (0.843–1.437) | 0.46 | 1.443 (1.227–1.696) | <0.0001 | 5.256 (3.820–7.230) | <0.0001 |
| 2015 | 1.319 (0.991–1.756) | 0.07 | 1.815 (1.523–2.164) | <0.0001 | 7.349 (5.247–10.295) | <0.0001 |