Chubin Ou1,2, Winston Chong3, Chuan-Zhi Duan2, Xin Zhang2, Michael Morgan1, Yi Qian4. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. National Key Clinical Specialty/Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Neurosurgery Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 4. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. yi.qian@mq.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture is important in the management of unruptured aneurysms. The application of radiomics in predicting aneurysm rupture remained largely unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the radiomics differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms and explore its potential use in predicting aneurysm rupture. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two aneurysms were included in the study (93 unruptured). Morphological and radiomics features were extracted for each case. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant features which were incorporated into prediction models constructed with a machine learning algorithm. To investigate the usefulness of radiomics features, three models were constructed and compared. The baseline model A was constructed with morphological features, while model B was constructed with addition of radiomics shape features and model C with more radiomics features. Multivariate analysis was performed for the ten most important variables in model C to identify independent risk factors. A simplified model based on independent risk factors was constructed for clinical use. RESULTS: Five morphological features and 89 radiomics features were significantly associated with rupture. Model A, model B, and model C achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.767, 0.807, and 0.879, respectively. Model C was significantly better than model A and model B (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified two radiomics features which were used to construct the simplified model showing an AUROC of 0.876. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics signatures were different between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The use of radiomics features, especially texture features, may significantly improve rupture prediction performance. KEY POINTS: • Significant radiomics differences exist between ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. • Radiomics shape features can significantly improve rupture prediction performance over conventional morphology-based prediction model. The inclusion of histogram and texture radiomics features can further improve the performance. • A simplified model with two variables achieved a similar level of performance as the more complex ones. Our prediction model can serve as a promising tool for the risk management of intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVES: Prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture is important in the management of unruptured aneurysms. The application of radiomics in predicting aneurysm rupture remained largely unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the radiomics differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms and explore its potential use in predicting aneurysm rupture. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two aneurysms were included in the study (93 unruptured). Morphological and radiomics features were extracted for each case. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant features which were incorporated into prediction models constructed with a machine learning algorithm. To investigate the usefulness of radiomics features, three models were constructed and compared. The baseline model A was constructed with morphological features, while model B was constructed with addition of radiomics shape features and model C with more radiomics features. Multivariate analysis was performed for the ten most important variables in model C to identify independent risk factors. A simplified model based on independent risk factors was constructed for clinical use. RESULTS: Five morphological features and 89 radiomics features were significantly associated with rupture. Model A, model B, and model C achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.767, 0.807, and 0.879, respectively. Model C was significantly better than model A and model B (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified two radiomics features which were used to construct the simplified model showing an AUROC of 0.876. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics signatures were different between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The use of radiomics features, especially texture features, may significantly improve rupture prediction performance. KEY POINTS: • Significant radiomics differences exist between ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. • Radiomics shape features can significantly improve rupture prediction performance over conventional morphology-based prediction model. The inclusion of histogram and texture radiomics features can further improve the performance. • A simplified model with two variables achieved a similar level of performance as the more complex ones. Our prediction model can serve as a promising tool for the risk management of intracranial aneurysms.
Authors: Nicole Varble; Vincent M Tutino; Jihnhee Yu; Ashish Sonig; Adnan H Siddiqui; Jason M Davies; Hui Meng Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jianping Xiang; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Markus Tremmel; Ding Ma; J Mocco; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; Hui Meng Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: David O Wiebers; J P Whisnant; J Huston; I Meissner; R D Brown; D G Piepgras; G S Forbes; K Thielen; D Nichols; W M O'Fallon; J Peacock; L Jaeger; N F Kassell; G L Kongable-Beckman; J C Torner Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Vittorio Stumpo; Victor E Staartjes; Giuseppe Esposito; Carlo Serra; Luca Regli; Alessandro Olivi; Carmelo Lucio Sturiale Journal: Acta Neurochir Suppl Date: 2022