Carla L Fisher1, Michaela D Mullis2, Amanda Kastrinos2, Easton Wollney2, Elisa S Weiss3, Maria Sae-Hau3, Carma L Bylund4. 1. College of Journalism & Communications, UF Health Cancer Center, UF Health Center for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. carlalfisher@ufl.edu. 2. College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA. 4. College of Journalism & Communications, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Research on the impact of family cancer caregiving is primarily dyadic in focus. How caregiving affects the larger family system is less understood, yet knowing this is vital to developing supportive resources for caregivers, patients, and their families. To better understand how blood cancer caregiving impacts the family system, we explored the experiences of adult child caregivers of diagnosed parents and parent caregivers of diagnosed children. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 midlife parent and adult child caregivers of patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Using a family systems theory lens, we conducted a thematic analysis using the constant comparative method to identify how caregiving impacts the larger family system. RESULTS: Caregivers ranged from age 30 to 64 (M = 43). They described four ways that caregiving impacted themselves and the larger family system: (1) disruption of home life, (2) emotional (dis)connection, (3) juggling competing roles, and (4) developing resiliency and intimacy. Perspectives within each category differed based on their relational role to the patient or in the broader family. CONCLUSIONS: Themes identify ways to provide support to both caregiver types. Support care resources could help families navigate gains and losses impacting the family system after a blood cancer diagnosis. Both caregiver types described experiencing (and/or their family experiencing) a loss in relational connection, feeling alone, and members distancing themselves. Both caregiver types also described gains in family functioning, like strengthened bonds and togetherness. Findings validate the need for family-centered support with key areas to address for healthy family functioning.
PURPOSE: Research on the impact of family cancer caregiving is primarily dyadic in focus. How caregiving affects the larger family system is less understood, yet knowing this is vital to developing supportive resources for caregivers, patients, and their families. To better understand how blood cancer caregiving impacts the family system, we explored the experiences of adult child caregivers of diagnosed parents and parent caregivers of diagnosed children. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 midlife parent and adult child caregivers of patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Using a family systems theory lens, we conducted a thematic analysis using the constant comparative method to identify how caregiving impacts the larger family system. RESULTS: Caregivers ranged from age 30 to 64 (M = 43). They described four ways that caregiving impacted themselves and the larger family system: (1) disruption of home life, (2) emotional (dis)connection, (3) juggling competing roles, and (4) developing resiliency and intimacy. Perspectives within each category differed based on their relational role to the patient or in the broader family. CONCLUSIONS: Themes identify ways to provide support to both caregiver types. Support care resources could help families navigate gains and losses impacting the family system after a blood cancer diagnosis. Both caregiver types described experiencing (and/or their family experiencing) a loss in relational connection, feeling alone, and members distancing themselves. Both caregiver types also described gains in family functioning, like strengthened bonds and togetherness. Findings validate the need for family-centered support with key areas to address for healthy family functioning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood cancer; Cancer; Caregiving; Coping; Family system; Lifespan
Authors: Katrina R Ellis; Mary R Janevic; Trace Kershaw; Cleopatra H Caldwell; Nancy K Janz; Laurel Northouse Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ashley Leak Bryant; Allison M Deal; AnnMarie Walton; William A Wood; Hyman Muss; Deborah K Mayer Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Gemme Campbell-Salome; Carla L Fisher; Kevin B Wright; Greg Lincoln; Allison J Applebaum; Maria Sae-Hau; Elisa S Weiss; Carma L Bylund Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: Amanda L Kastrinos; Carma L Bylund; Michaela D Mullis; Easton Wollney; Maria Sae-Hau; Elisa Weiss; Carla L Fisher Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2021-10-12 Impact factor: 1.757
Authors: Carma L Bylund; Easton N Wollney; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Allison J Applebaum; Samantha R Paige; Kennan DeGruccio; Elisa Weiss; Maria Sae-Hau; Jason Arnold; Domenic Durante; Tithi B Amin; Chelsea N Hampton; Carla L Fisher Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-07-05