Literature DB >> 33051224

Long-term Outcomes of Individuals With Metabolic Diseases Identified Through Newborn Screening.

Ulrike Mütze1, Sven F Garbade2, Gwendolyn Gramer2, Martin Lindner3, Peter Freisinger4, Sarah Catharina Grünert5, Julia Hennermann6, Regina Ensenauer7,8, Eva Thimm7, Judith Zirnbauer9, Michael Leichsenring9, Florian Gleich2, Friederike Hörster2, Karina Grohmann-Held2,10, Nikolas Boy2, Junmin Fang-Hoffmann2, Peter Burgard2, Magdalena Walter2, Georg F Hoffmann2, Stefan Kölker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although extended newborn screening (NBS) programs have been introduced more than 20 years ago, their impact on the long-term clinical outcome of individuals with inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) is still rarely investigated.
METHODS: We studied the clinical outcomes of individuals with IMDs identified by NBS between 1999 and 2016 in a prospective multicenter observational study.
RESULTS: In total, 306 screened individuals with IMDs (115 with phenylketonuria and 191 with other IMDs with a lifelong risk for metabolic decompensation) were followed for a median time of 6.2 years. Although the risk for metabolic decompensation was disease-specific and NBS could not prevent decompensations in every individual at risk (n = 49), the majority did not develop permanent disease-specific signs (75.9%), showed normal development (95.6%) and normal cognitive outcome (87.7%; mean IQ: 100.4), and mostly attended regular kindergarten (95.2%) and primary school (95.2%). This demonstrates that not only individuals with phenylketonuria, serving as a benchmark, but also those with lifelong risk for metabolic decompensation had a favorable long-term outcome. High NBS process quality is the prerequisite of this favorable outcome. This is supported by 28 individuals presenting with first symptoms at a median age of 3.5 days before NBS results were available, by the absence of neonatal decompensations after the report of NBS results, and by the challenge of keeping relevant process parameters at a constantly high level.
CONCLUSIONS: NBS for IMDs, although not completely preventing clinical presentations in all individuals, can be considered a highly successful program of secondary prevention.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33051224     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-0444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

Review 1.  Target Diseases for Neonatal Screening in Germany.

Authors:  Ute Spiekerkoetter; Heiko Krude
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.251

Review 2.  Towards Achieving Equity and Innovation in Newborn Screening across Europe.

Authors:  Jaka Sikonja; Urh Groselj; Maurizio Scarpa; Giancarlo la Marca; David Cheillan; Stefan Kölker; Rolf H Zetterström; Viktor Kožich; Yann Le Cam; Gulcin Gumus; Valentina Bottarelli; Mirjam van der Burg; Eugenie Dekkers; Tadej Battelino; Johan Prevot; Peter C J I Schielen; James R Bonham
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Neonatal Screening for Congenital Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders–Results From Germany for the Years 2006–2018.

Authors:  Anja Lüders; Oliver Blankenstein; Inken Brockow; Regina Ensenauer; Martin Lindner; Andreas Schulze; Uta Nennstiel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Real-world management of maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) metabolic decompensations with branched chain amino acid-free formulas in France and Germany: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Pascale de Lonlay; Roland Posset; Ulrike Mütze; Karine Mention; Delphine Lamireau; Manuel Schiff; Aude Servais; Jean Baptiste Arnoux; Anaïs Brassier; Myriam Dao; Claire Douillard; Chris Ottolenghi; Clément Pontoizeau; Federica Miotto; Jeannie Le Mouhaër
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2021-03-06

5.  Why are Birth Defects Surveillance Programs Important?

Authors:  Débora Gusmão Melo; Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino; Thanyse de Oliveira Schmalfuss; Mariela Larrandaburu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 6.  [Precision medicine in pediatric neurology exemplified by the new treatment forms].

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 1.297

Review 7.  Rare Disease Registries Are Key to Evidence-Based Personalized Medicine: Highlighting the European Experience.

Authors:  Stefan Kölker; Florian Gleich; Ulrike Mütze; Thomas Opladen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Opportunities and challenges in machine learning-based newborn screening-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Elaine Zaunseder; Saskia Haupt; Ulrike Mütze; Sven F Garbade; Stefan Kölker; Vincent Heuveline
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2022-03-23

9.  The Follow-Up of Chinese Patients in cblC Type Methylmalonic Acidemia Identified Through Expanded Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Shiying Ling; Shengnan Wu; Ruixue Shuai; Yue Yu; Wenjuan Qiu; Haiyan Wei; Chiju Yang; Peng Xu; Hui Zou; Jizhen Feng; Tingting Niu; Haili Hu; Huiwen Zhang; Lili Liang; Deyun Lu; Zhuwen Gong; Xia Zhan; Wenjun Ji; Xuefan Gu; Lianshu Han
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Sudden neonatal death in individuals with medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: limit of newborn screening.

Authors:  Ulrike Mütze; Uta Nennstiel; Birgit Odenwald; Claudia Haase; Uta Ceglarek; Nils Janzen; Sven F Garbade; Georg F Hoffmann; Stefan Kölker; Dorothea Haas
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.