Anja Lüders1, Oliver Blankenstein, Inken Brockow, Regina Ensenauer, Martin Lindner, Andreas Schulze, Uta Nennstiel. 1. Bavarian State Office for Health and Food Safety: Health Reporting, Epidemiology, Social Medicine, Child Health, Screening Center, Oberschleißheim; Institute for Experimental Pediatric Endocrinology, Charité-University Medical Center Berlin; Department of Child Nutrition, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Max Rubner Institute, Karlsruhe; Department of General Pediatrics, Neonatology, and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Canada; Neonatal Metabolic Screening, Hessian Center for Preventive Care in Children, Screening Center; Hesse, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of neonatal screening is the early detection of congenital metabolic and endocrine disorders that, if untreated, could lead to fatal crises or other long-term adverse sequelae. In Germany, neonatal screening is legally regulated. Quality-assurance reports ("DGNS reports") are created and published annually by the German Society for Neonatal Screening (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neugeborenen-Screening). Data from the DGNS reports for the years 2006-2018 serve as the basis of the present publication. METHODS: For the years 2006-2018, prevalences were calculated and data on process quality were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 9 218 538 births, 6917 neonates were identified who had one of the target diseases. The overall prevalence was 75 per 100 000 neonates; the disorders most commonly found were congenital hypothyroidism (30 per 100 000) followed by phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD) (10 per 100 000 each). Of the 272 205 follow-up screenings requested, 80% were received. The rate of positive screening findings (recall rate) declined over the observation period, from 0.90% in 2006 to 0.37% in 2018. For every five positive screening findings, one case of a target disorder was confirmed. 79% of the children for whom treatment was indicated began to receive treatment within two weeks. CONCLUSION: The low recall rate and the early initiation of treatment in 79% of the affected children indicate that neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders in Germany is effective. The incorporation of tracking structures and the introduction of a registry could further improve the quality of the program.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of neonatal screening is the early detection of congenital metabolic and endocrine disorders that, if untreated, could lead to fatal crises or other long-term adverse sequelae. In Germany, neonatal screening is legally regulated. Quality-assurance reports ("DGNS reports") are created and published annually by the German Society for Neonatal Screening (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neugeborenen-Screening). Data from the DGNS reports for the years 2006-2018 serve as the basis of the present publication. METHODS: For the years 2006-2018, prevalences were calculated and data on process quality were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 9 218 538 births, 6917 neonates were identified who had one of the target diseases. The overall prevalence was 75 per 100 000 neonates; the disorders most commonly found were congenital hypothyroidism (30 per 100 000) followed by phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD) (10 per 100 000 each). Of the 272 205 follow-up screenings requested, 80% were received. The rate of positive screening findings (recall rate) declined over the observation period, from 0.90% in 2006 to 0.37% in 2018. For every five positive screening findings, one case of a target disorder was confirmed. 79% of the children for whom treatment was indicated began to receive treatment within two weeks. CONCLUSION: The low recall rate and the early initiation of treatment in 79% of the affected children indicate that neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders in Germany is effective. The incorporation of tracking structures and the introduction of a registry could further improve the quality of the program.
Authors: Bernhard Liebl; Uta Nennstiel-Ratzel; Rüdiger von Kries; Ralph Fingerhut; Bernhard Olgemöller; Andreas Zapf; Adelbert A Roscher Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: B Odenwald; H-G Dörr; W Bonfig; H Schmidt; R Fingerhut; M Wildner; U Nennstiel-Ratzel Journal: Klin Padiatr Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 1.349
Authors: Uta Nennstiel-Ratzel; Stephan Arenz; Esther M Maier; Ina Knerr; Joachim Baumkötter; Wulf Röschinger; Bernhard Liebl; Hans-Beat Hadorn; Adelbert A Roscher; Rüdiger von Kries Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2005-02-12 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Martina C Cornel; Tessel Rigter; Stephanie S Weinreich; Peter Burgard; Georg F Hoffmann; Martin Lindner; J Gerard Loeber; Kathrin Rupp; Domenica Taruscio; Luciano Vittozzi Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Sabine M El-Helou; Anika-Kerstin Biegner; Sebastian Bode; Stephan R Ehl; Maximilian Heeg; Maria E Maccari; Henrike Ritterbusch; Carsten Speckmann; Stephan Rusch; Raphael Scheible; Klaus Warnatz; Faranaz Atschekzei; Renata Beider; Diana Ernst; Stev Gerschmann; Alexandra Jablonka; Gudrun Mielke; Reinhold E Schmidt; Gesine Schürmann; Georgios Sogkas; Ulrich H Baumann; Christian Klemann; Dorothee Viemann; Horst von Bernuth; Renate Krüger; Leif G Hanitsch; Carmen M Scheibenbogen; Kirsten Wittke; Michael H Albert; Anna Eichinger; Fabian Hauck; Christoph Klein; Anita Rack-Hoch; Franz M Sollinger; Anne Avila; Michael Borte; Stephan Borte; Maria Fasshauer; Anja Hauenherm; Nils Kellner; Anna H Müller; Anett Ülzen; Peter Bader; Shahrzad Bakhtiar; Jae-Yun Lee; Ursula Heß; Ralf Schubert; Sandra Wölke; Stefan Zielen; Sujal Ghosh; Hans-Juergen Laws; Jennifer Neubert; Prasad T Oommen; Manfred Hönig; Ansgar Schulz; Sandra Steinmann; Klaus Schwarz; Gregor Dückers; Beate Lamers; Vanessa Langemeyer; Tim Niehues; Sonu Shai; Dagmar Graf; Carmen Müglich; Marc T Schmalzing; Eva C Schwaneck; Hans-Peter Tony; Johannes Dirks; Gabriele Haase; Johannes G Liese; Henner Morbach; Dirk Foell; Antje Hellige; Helmut Wittkowski; Katja Masjosthusmann; Michael Mohr; Linda Geberzahn; Christian M Hedrich; Christiane Müller; Angela Rösen-Wolff; Joachim Roesler; Antje Zimmermann; Uta Behrends; Nikolaus Rieber; Uwe Schauer; Rupert Handgretinger; Ursula Holzer; Jörg Henes; Lothar Kanz; Christoph Boesecke; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Carolynne Schwarze-Zander; Jan-Christian Wasmuth; Dagmar Dilloo; Brigitte Hülsmann; Stefan Schönberger; Stefan Schreiber; Rainald Zeuner; Tobias Ankermann; Philipp von Bismarck; Hans-Iko Huppertz; Petra Kaiser-Labusch; Johann Greil; Donate Jakoby; Andreas E Kulozik; Markus Metzler; Nora Naumann-Bartsch; Bettina Sobik; Norbert Graf; Sabine Heine; Robin Kobbe; Kai Lehmberg; Ingo Müller; Friedrich Herrmann; Gerd Horneff; Ariane Klein; Joachim Peitz; Nadine Schmidt; Stefan Bielack; Ute Groß-Wieltsch; Carl F Classen; Jessica Klasen; Peter Deutz; Dirk Kamitz; Lisa Lassay; Klaus Tenbrock; Norbert Wagner; Benedikt Bernbeck; Bastian Brummel; Eusebia Lara-Villacanas; Esther Münstermann; Dominik T Schneider; Nadine Tietsch; Marco Westkemper; Michael Weiß; Christof Kramm; Ingrid Kühnle; Silke Kullmann; Hermann Girschick; Christof Specker; Elisabeth Vinnemeier-Laubenthal; Henriette Haenicke; Claudia Schulz; Lothar Schweigerer; Thomas G Müller; Martina Stiefel; Bernd H Belohradsky; Veronika Soetedjo; Gerhard Kindle; Bodo Grimbacher Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 7.561