Literature DB >> 33051119

Use of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Identify Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Knee Arthroplasty.

Elham Sagheb1, Taghi Ramazanian1, Ahmad P Tafti1, Sunyang Fu1, Walter K Kremers1, Daniel J Berry2, David G Lewallen2, Sunghwan Sohn1, Hilal Maradit Kremers3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) methods have the capability to process clinical free text in electronic health records, decreasing the need for costly manual chart review, and improving data quality. We developed rule-based NLP algorithms to automatically extract surgery specific data elements from knee arthroplasty operative notes.
METHODS: Within a cohort of 20,000 knee arthroplasty operative notes from 2000 to 2017 at a large tertiary institution, we randomly selected independent pairs of training and test sets to develop and evaluate NLP algorithms to detect five major data elements. The size of the training and test datasets were similar and ranged between 420 to 1592 surgeries. Expert rules using keywords in operative notes were used to implement NLP algorithms capturing: (1) category of surgery (total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty), (2) laterality of surgery, (3) constraint type, (4) presence of patellar resurfacing, and (5) implant model (catalog numbers). We used institutional registry data as our gold standard to evaluate the NLP algorithms.
RESULTS: NLP algorithms to detect the category of surgery, laterality, constraint, and patellar resurfacing achieved 98.3%, 99.5%, 99.2%, and 99.4% accuracy on test datasets, respectively. The implant model algorithm achieved an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 99.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: NLP algorithms are a promising alternative to costly manual chart review to automate the extraction of embedded information within knee arthroplasty operative notes. Further validation in other hospital settings will enhance widespread implementation and efficiency in data capture for research and clinical purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; constraint; electronic health records; natural language processing; patella resurfacing; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33051119      PMCID: PMC7897213          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Fern FitzHenry; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Kristen L Kotter; Kimberly Crimin; Robert S Dittus; Amy K Rosen; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  More Data Please! The Evolution of Orthopaedic Research: Commentary on an article by Cody C. Wyles, MD, et al.: "Use of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Identify Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Total Hip Arthroplasty".

Authors:  Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Use of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Identify Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Meagan E Tibbo; Sunyang Fu; Yanshan Wang; Sunghwan Sohn; Walter K Kremers; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen; Hilal Maradit-Kremers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Variation in hospital-level risk-standardized complication rates following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Laura M Grosso; Zhenqiu Lin; Craig S Parzynski; Lisa G Suter; Harlan M Krumholz; Jay R Lieberman; Daniel J Berry; Robert Bucholz; Lein Han; Michael T Rapp; Susannah Bernheim; Elizabeth E Drye
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Dirk R Larson; Cynthia S Crowson; Walter K Kremers; Raynard E Washington; Claudia A Steiner; William A Jiranek; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Open mHealth Architecture: A Primer for Tomorrow's Orthopedic Surgeon and Introduction to Its Use in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prem N Ramkumar; George F Muschler; Kurt P Spindler; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Use of Natural Language Processing Tools to Identify and Classify Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Meagan E Tibbo; Cody C Wyles; Sunyang Fu; Sunghwan Sohn; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  An information extraction framework for cohort identification using electronic health records.

Authors:  Hongfang Liu; Suzette J Bielinski; Sunghwan Sohn; Sean Murphy; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Siddhartha R Jonnalagadda; K E Ravikumar; Stephen T Wu; Iftikhar J Kullo; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  3 in total

1.  Automatic Brand Identification of Orthopedic Implants from Radiographs: Ready for the Next Step?

Authors:  Merel Huisman; Nikolas Lessmann
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Can We Geographically Validate a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Automated Detection of Incidental Durotomy Across Three Independent Cohorts From Two Continents?

Authors:  Aditya V Karhade; Jacobien H F Oosterhoff; Olivier Q Groot; Nicole Agaronnik; Jeffrey Ehresman; Michiel E R Bongers; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Santosh I Poonnoose; Daniel M Sciubba; Daniel G Tobert; Job N Doornberg; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: current concept of the available clinical applications.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Jobe Shatrov; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Parratte; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-05-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.