BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) methods have the capability to process clinical free text in electronic health records, decreasing the need for costly manual chart review, and improving data quality. We developed rule-based NLP algorithms to automatically extract surgery specific data elements from knee arthroplasty operative notes. METHODS: Within a cohort of 20,000 knee arthroplasty operative notes from 2000 to 2017 at a large tertiary institution, we randomly selected independent pairs of training and test sets to develop and evaluate NLP algorithms to detect five major data elements. The size of the training and test datasets were similar and ranged between 420 to 1592 surgeries. Expert rules using keywords in operative notes were used to implement NLP algorithms capturing: (1) category of surgery (total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty), (2) laterality of surgery, (3) constraint type, (4) presence of patellar resurfacing, and (5) implant model (catalog numbers). We used institutional registry data as our gold standard to evaluate the NLP algorithms. RESULTS: NLP algorithms to detect the category of surgery, laterality, constraint, and patellar resurfacing achieved 98.3%, 99.5%, 99.2%, and 99.4% accuracy on test datasets, respectively. The implant model algorithm achieved an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: NLP algorithms are a promising alternative to costly manual chart review to automate the extraction of embedded information within knee arthroplasty operative notes. Further validation in other hospital settings will enhance widespread implementation and efficiency in data capture for research and clinical purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) methods have the capability to process clinical free text in electronic health records, decreasing the need for costly manual chart review, and improving data quality. We developed rule-based NLP algorithms to automatically extract surgery specific data elements from knee arthroplasty operative notes. METHODS: Within a cohort of 20,000 knee arthroplasty operative notes from 2000 to 2017 at a large tertiary institution, we randomly selected independent pairs of training and test sets to develop and evaluate NLP algorithms to detect five major data elements. The size of the training and test datasets were similar and ranged between 420 to 1592 surgeries. Expert rules using keywords in operative notes were used to implement NLP algorithms capturing: (1) category of surgery (total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty), (2) laterality of surgery, (3) constraint type, (4) presence of patellar resurfacing, and (5) implant model (catalog numbers). We used institutional registry data as our gold standard to evaluate the NLP algorithms. RESULTS: NLP algorithms to detect the category of surgery, laterality, constraint, and patellar resurfacing achieved 98.3%, 99.5%, 99.2%, and 99.4% accuracy on test datasets, respectively. The implant model algorithm achieved an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: NLP algorithms are a promising alternative to costly manual chart review to automate the extraction of embedded information within knee arthroplasty operative notes. Further validation in other hospital settings will enhance widespread implementation and efficiency in data capture for research and clinical purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Harvey J Murff; Fern FitzHenry; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Kristen L Kotter; Kimberly Crimin; Robert S Dittus; Amy K Rosen; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; Theodore Speroff Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cody C Wyles; Meagan E Tibbo; Sunyang Fu; Yanshan Wang; Sunghwan Sohn; Walter K Kremers; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen; Hilal Maradit-Kremers Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kevin J Bozic; Laura M Grosso; Zhenqiu Lin; Craig S Parzynski; Lisa G Suter; Harlan M Krumholz; Jay R Lieberman; Daniel J Berry; Robert Bucholz; Lein Han; Michael T Rapp; Susannah Bernheim; Elizabeth E Drye Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Hilal Maradit Kremers; Dirk R Larson; Cynthia S Crowson; Walter K Kremers; Raynard E Washington; Claudia A Steiner; William A Jiranek; Daniel J Berry Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Prem N Ramkumar; George F Muschler; Kurt P Spindler; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch; Michael A Mont Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Hongfang Liu; Suzette J Bielinski; Sunghwan Sohn; Sean Murphy; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Siddhartha R Jonnalagadda; K E Ravikumar; Stephen T Wu; Iftikhar J Kullo; Christopher G Chute Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2013-03-18
Authors: Aditya V Karhade; Jacobien H F Oosterhoff; Olivier Q Groot; Nicole Agaronnik; Jeffrey Ehresman; Michiel E R Bongers; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Santosh I Poonnoose; Daniel M Sciubba; Daniel G Tobert; Job N Doornberg; Joseph H Schwab Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.755