| Literature DB >> 33050923 |
Fernanda Sales Coelho1, Rutchanee Rodpai2,3, André Miller4, Shannon E Karinshak2,5, Victoria H Mann2,5, Omar Dos Santos Carvalho1, Roberta Lima Caldeira1, Marina de Moraes Mourão6, Paul J Brindley7,8, Wannaporn Ittiprasert9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Larval development in an intermediate host gastropod snail of the genus Biomphalaria is an obligatory component of the life-cycle of Schistosoma mansoni. Understanding of the mechanism(s) of host defense may hasten the development of tools that block transmission of schistosomiasis. The allograft inflammatory factor 1, AIF, which is evolutionarily conserved and expressed in phagocytes, is a marker of macrophage activation in both mammals and invertebrates. AIF enhances cell proliferation and migration. The embryonic cell line, termed Bge, from Biomphalaria glabrata is a versatile resource for investigation of the snail-schistosome relationship since Bge exhibits a hemocyte-like phenotype. Hemocytes perform central roles in innate and cellular immunity in gastropods and in some cases can kill the parasite. However, the Bge cells do not kill the parasite in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Allograft inflammatory factor; Bge; Biomphalaria glabrata embryonic cell line; CRISPR/Cas9; Cell adhesion; Gene editing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33050923 PMCID: PMC7552541 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04384-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of BgAIF gene structure, CRISPR/Cas9 vector and expression in Bge cell. a Gene structure of B. glabrata allograft inflammatory factor (BgAIF), accession number BGLB005061 and gene editing target locus (red box) on exon 4. BgAIF gene composed of 5 exons and 4 introns. The green arrows indicate the location of primers flanking expected double-strand breaks (DSB) which were used in PCR to generate the on-target amplicon for INDELs estimation. b Map of the pCas-BgAIFx4 vector which includes the Pol III-dependent mammalian U6 gene promoter (red arrow) to drive transcription of the guide RNA targeting exon 4 of BgAIF gene (red arrow) and the CMV promoter to drive expression of the S. pyogenes Cas9 nuclease (blue arrow). Primer pairs specific for the guide RNA and for Cas9 are indicated (green arrows). c Expression of Cas9 and of BgActin (as the reference gene) transcripts as established by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in pCas-BgAIF-transfected (right) and control (left) Bge cells from days one to nine following transfection. The amplicons of the expected sizes are as indicated: 23 bp for Cas9 and 214 bp for BgActin. All RNA samples were positive for the BgActin reference gene; the 214 bp band
Fig. 2Establishment of BgAIF-knockout lines of Bge cells. a Representative examples of frequent gene insertions-deletions (1–2 bp insertions and 8–30 bp deletions, straddling the programmed CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-stranded break in exon 4, as determined by ICE software-based analysis. b TIDE algorithm-based violin plot of insertion-deletion percentages (% INDEL) computed using the amplicon sequence traces from the 12 biological replicates of pCas-BgAIF-transfected Bge cell populations. c Reduction of BgAIF transcription by about 50% following programmed genome editing of Bge cells (∆BgAIF-Bge) in comparison to control Bge cells. Mean transcript reduction, 49.55 ± 20.22% (SD), P ≤ 0.0001**** (n = 12) (unpaired Student’s t-test)
Fig. 3Programmed knockout of BgAIF in Bge cells caused reduced adherence to primary sporocysts. a Representative micrographs of primary sporocysts co-cultured with Bge cells in our laboratory to profile the semi-quantitative scoring of the cell adhesion index (CAI): 1, no cells adhering to the surface of the sporocyst; 2, ≤ 10 cells adhering to the sporocyst; 3, > 10 cells < half of the sporocyst surface covered by cells or clumps of cells; 4, > half the sporocyst surface covered by Bge cells. b Representative micrographs indicate the reduced levels of ∆BgAIF-Bge cells adherence (right panel) in comparison to control, mock-transfected Bge cells (left panel) to the co-cultured sporocysts. c Bar chart to present the CAI values from control (mock-transfected) ∆BgAIF-Bge cells during co-culture with primary sporocysts at a co-culture ratio of one sporocyst to 100 Bge cells; CAI = 2.66 ± 0.10 (mean ± SD; 476 sporocysts in total scored) for the mock-transfected Bge and 2.31 ± 0.23 for the ∆BgAIF-Bge cells (424 sporocysts in total scored); P = 0.0033, unpaired Student’s t-test; n = 7 biological replicates. d The cell adhesion score ranging from 1 to 4 of individual sporocysts. Cell adhesion scores 1, 2, 3 and 4 from mock cells were 2.5 ± 1.58 (SE), 29.28 ± 4.06, 20.85 ± 2.15 and 13.14 ± 2.55, respectively, whereas in the ∆BgAIF-Bge cells cell adhesion scores 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 8.86 ± 1.57, 31.42 ± 4.07, 13.28 ± 2.51 and 13.13 ± 2.55, respectively. There was a higher amount of sporocyst from the BgAIF edited-mixed cell population scored as ‘1′ than control cells with statistic significant by t-test (t ratio = 3.98, P = 0.001). Also, there was a lower amount of sporocysts scored as ‘3′ in ∆BgAIF-Bge cells compared with the control cells (t ratio = 2.40, P = 0.004)