| Literature DB >> 33050306 |
Paulina Sobierajska1, Anna Serwotka-Suszczak2, Damian Szymanski1, Krzysztof Marycz2,3,4, Rafal J Wiglusz1,3.
Abstract
In the present study, a nanoapatite-mediated delivery system for imatinib has been proposed.Entities:
Keywords: anticancer targeted therapies; cytotoxicity; imatinib; nanohydroxyapatite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33050306 PMCID: PMC7587182 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) patterns (A) of the crystalline imatinib (IM) β-form (magenta line), amorphous IM (blue line), nHAp modified by imatinib (nHAp/IM, black line), and nHAp (red line) with the corresponding reference hydroxyapatite pattern (ICSD–26204). Rietveld analysis (B) of the obtained nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp).
Unit cell parameters (a, c), cell volume (V), crystallite size, and refine factor (Rwp) for the Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 (nHAp) prepared by co-precipitation method and annealed at 500 °C.
| Sample | a (Å) | c (Å) | V (Å3) | Size (nm) | Rwp (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| single crystal [ | 9.424(4) | 6.879(4) | 529.09(44) | – | – |
| nHAp | 9.430(4) | 6.891(4) | 530.76(02) | 45.5(5) | 3.2 |
Figure 2Representatives SEM images of the (a) nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp), (b) amorphous imatinib (IM) and (c) nHAp modified by imatinib (nHAp/IM), (d) histogram of the nHAp grain size distribution (length-wise and width-wise diameters), (e) EDS elemental mapping of the nHAp modified by imatinib together with EDS spectra for selected areas.
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of imatinib (IM β-form, blue line), nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp, red line), and nHAp/IM (black line) with the indication of characteristic vibration bands for both compounds. Types of vibration: ν, stretching; δ, deformation (bending); oop, out-of-plane bending; ρ, rocking; τ, torsion.
Figure 4Hydrodynamic size of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) and nHAp modified by imatinib (nHAp/IM) monitored in de-ionized water and cell culture medium.
Zeta potentials of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp), Imatinib mesylate (IM), and nHAp modified by IM in de-ionized water and culture medium.
| Sample | Zeta Potential ( | Zeta Potential ( |
|---|---|---|
| nHAp | −18.8 ± 0.2 | −10.4 ± 0.3 |
| IM | −15.9 ± 0.7 | −8.9 ± 0.5 |
| nHAp/IM | −14.0 ± 0.4 | −10.4 ± 0.1 |
Figure 5TOX-8 viability test results for NI-1 (A–C), L929 (D–F), and D17 (G–I) cells depending on the concentration of experimental compounds used: imatinib, nHAp modified with imatinib and nHAp alone. IC50 is indicated if possible. R2 stands for the coefficient of determination.
Figure 6Comparison of results of cytotoxicity analysis of imatinib and modified nHAp on NI-1 (A), L929 (B), and D17 (C) cells. Results are expressed as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.