| Literature DB >> 30705033 |
Koichi Miyamura1, Kazunori Ohnishi2, Shigeki Ohtake3, Noriko Usui4, Chiaki Nakaseko5,6, Hiroyuki Fujita7, Shin Fujisawa8, Toru Sakura9, Hirokazu Okumura10, Noriyoshi Iriyama11, Nobuhiko Emi12, Katsumichi Fujimaki13, Sumihisa Honda14, Yasushi Miyazaki15, Tomoki Naoe16.
Abstract
In 2007, we conducted a prospective randomized study to compare an aggressive dose escalation (group B, n = 123) with the standard dose escalation proposed by European LeukemiaNet (group A, n = 122). In group B, if patients did not achieve a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 3 months or did not achieve a major molecular response (MR3) at 6 months, imatinib was increased to 600 mg. At 6 months CCyR was achieved in 69.4% and 78.7% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. The rate of MR3 at 12 months and 24 months were similar in group A (52.1% and 70.0%) and group B (58.7% and 68.3%). The cumulative incidence of withdrawal by failure without accelerated/blast phase was higher in group A than in group B (9.2% vs 2.5% at 24 months). At 3 and 6 months, the protocol called for the imatinib dose to increase to 600 mg in 90 patients (74.4%) in group B. Among the 42 patients who received increased dose according to the protocol, 25 (60.0%) achieved MR3 at 12 months, whereas only 14 (35.0%) of 40 patients who did not receive an increased dose achieved MR3 (P < .05). The number of patients who withdrew from this study was similar (group A, 20%; group B, 21%). The early aggressive dose escalation failed to produce a better molecular response at 12 months. However, for patients who tolerate imatinib well, but show inadequate response at an early time point, aggressive dose escalation may contribute to achieving a better outcome. This study was registered at http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as #R000000965.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30705033 PMCID: PMC6373759 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018025981
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529