| Literature DB >> 33047810 |
Monica Margoni1,2, Davide Poggiali2,3, Sofia Zywicki1, Martina Rubin1, Andrea Lazzarotto1, Silvia Franciotta1, Maria Giulia Anglani4, Francesco Causin4, Francesca Rinaldi1, Paola Perini1, Massimo Filippi5,6,7,8, Paolo Gallo1,9.
Abstract
No study has investigated red nucleus (RN) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) despite cerebellum and its connections are elective sites of MS-related pathology. In this study, we explore RN atrophy in early MS phases and its association with cerebellar damage (focal lesions and atrophy) and physical disability. Thirty-seven relapse-onset MS (RMS) patients having mean age of 35.6 ± 8.5 (18-56) years and mean disease duration of 1.1 ± 1.5 (0-5) years, and 36 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were studied. Cerebellar and RN lesions and volumes were analyzed on 3 T-MRI images. RMS did not differ from HC in cerebellar lobe volumes but significantly differed in both right (107.84 ± 13.95 mm3 vs. 99.37 ± 11.53 mm3 , p = .019) and left (109.71 ± 14.94 mm3 vs. 100.47 ± 15.78 mm3 , p = .020) RN volumes. Cerebellar white matter lesion volume (WMLV) inversely correlated with both right and left RN volumes (r = -.333, p = .004 and r = -.298, p = .010, respectively), while no correlation was detected between RN volumes and mean cortical thickness, cerebellar gray matter lesion volume, and supratentorial WMLV (right RN: r = -.147, p = .216; left RN: r = -.153, p = .196). Right, but not left, RN volume inversely correlated with midbrain WMLV (r = -.310, p = .008), while no correlation was observed between whole brainstem WMLV and either RN volumes (right RN: r = -.164, p = .164; left RN: r = -.64, p = .588). Finally, left RN volume correlated with vermis VIIb (r = .297, p = .011) and right interposed nucleus (r = .249, p = .034) volumes. We observed RN atrophy in early RMS, likely resulting from anterograde axonal degeneration starting in cerebellar and midbrain WML. RN atrophy seems a promising marker of neurodegeneration and/or cerebellar damage in RMS.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; cerebellum; red nucleus
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33047810 PMCID: PMC7721227 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
FIGURE 1A schematic illustration of the processing pipeline to evaluate red nucleus volume (see Material and Methods for explanations)
Demographic and clinical features of the groups included in the study
| HC ( | RRMS ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, F/M | 24/12 | 25/12 | 1.0 |
| Age at MRI scan, mean ± | 33.8 ± 9.9 | 35.6 ± 8.5 | .42 |
| Disease duration, mean ± | – | 1.1 ± 1.5 | – |
| EDSS, median (IQR) | – | 2.0 (1.5–2.0) | – |
| Right RN, mean ± | 107.84 ± 13.95 | 99.37 ± 11.53 |
|
| Left RN, mean ± | 109.71 ± 14.94 | 100.47 ± 15.78 |
|
| Mean cortical thickness (mm) | 5.87 ± 0.38 | 5.78 ± 0.27 | .371 |
| Cerebellar WMLV, mean ± | – | 123.13 ± 163.43 | – |
| Supratentorial WMLV, mean ± | – | 341.02 ± 1,172.80 | – |
| Brainstem WMLV, mean ± | – | 85.08 ± 147.0 | – |
| Midbrain WMVL, mean ± | – | 25.13 ± 56.45 | – |
| Cortical GMLV, mean ± | 59.65 ± 214.43 | – |
Abbreviations: EDSS, expanded disability status scale; GMLV, gray matter lesion volume; HC, healthy controls; IQR, interquartile range; RN, red nucleus; RRMS, relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis; SD, standard deviation; WMLV, white matter lesion volume.
p < .05.
Mean cerebellar volumes (mm3) and SD of RRMS and healthy controls (HC)
| HC ( | RRMS ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
| Mean |
|
| |
|
| 0.002301502 | 0.000670027 | 0.002376645 | 0.000561846 | .614 |
|
| 0.002590352 | 0.000842328 | 0.002791260 | 0.000681491 | .311 |
|
| 0.002919112 | 0.000872980 | 0.003009530 | 0.000723322 | .628 |
|
| 0.002740069 | 0.000927967 | 0.002935002 | 0.000692913 | .298 |
|
| 0.006317410 | 0.002007192 | 0.006480943 | 0.001637477 | .724 |
|
| 0.001424024 | 0.000449293 | 0.001430352 | 0.000349973 | .973 |
|
| 0.005369853 | 0.001606742 | 0.005707507 | 0.001348242 | .374 |
|
| 0.009709009 | 0.002741510 | 0.009378255 | 0.002320982 | .512 |
|
| 1.06528E‐05 | 5.61335E‐06 | 1.10246E‐05 | 6.81924E‐06 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.008383129 | 0.002303089 | 0.008636830 | 0.001948583 | .705 |
|
| 0.006719993 | 0.002055345 | 0.006909523 | 0.001895466 | .769 |
|
| 0.000351424 | 0.000101609 | 0.000338894 | 8.20934E‐05 | .595 |
|
| 0.006164449 | 0.001827956 | 0.006507936 | 0.001707451 | .487 |
|
| 0.003326942 | 0.001027895 | 0.003502277 | 0.000866804 | .455 |
|
| 0.000160291 | 5.13925E‐05 | 0.000150075 | 4.06692E‐05 | .480 |
|
| 0.003379965 | 0.001037441 | 0.003513652 | 0.000856862 | .564 |
|
| 0.003382789 | 0.001072485 | 0.003625168 | 0.000891045 | .327 |
|
| 0.000891382 | 0.000258704 | 0.000861586 | 0.000186131 | .558 |
|
| 0.003322524 | 0.001090567 | 0.003514819 | 0.000879843 | .440 |
|
| 0.002637954 | 0.000846047 | 0.002854016 | 0.000777884 | .274 |
|
| 0.000443174 | 0.000128391 | 0.000455487 | 9.50461E‐05 | .685 |
|
| 0.002931313 | 0.000941996 | 0.003119420 | 0.000791151 | .390 |
|
| 0.002375767 | 0.000705235 | 0.002399400 | 0.00059463 | .771 |
|
| 0.000560461 | 0.000139537 | 0.000567502 | 0.000113259 | .773 |
|
| 0.002854704 | 0.000838599 | 0.002868548 | 0.000646645 | .878 |
|
| 0.000363149 | 0.000127645 | 0.000389401 | 0.000138833 | .305 |
|
| 0.000275069 | 6.7564E‐05 | 0.000292240 | 6.6236E‐05 | .211 |
|
| 0.000431827 | 0.000139280 | 0.000466224 | 0.000120889 | .242 |
|
| 0.000568435 | 0.000125495 | 0.00057703 | 0.000115679 | .660 |
|
| 0.000546634 | 0.000147238 | 0.000538615 | 0.000106714 | .910 |
|
| 9.126E‐06 | 3.7176E‐06 | 8.17138E‐06 | 3.23017E‐06 | .200 |
|
| 5.60918E‐06 | 2.51593E‐06 | 5.56481E‐06 | 2.32856E‐06 | 1.000 |
Note: p values were calculated with Generalized Linear Model; significance level was set at p < .05.
FIGURE 2Possible causes of anterograde trans‐synaptic degeneration of red nucleus (RN) RMS: (a) lesions in the cerebellar subcortical white matter (WM); (b) WM damage between the cerebellar nuclei and RN (i.e., superior cerebellar peduncle); (c) WM damage of the cortical‐rubral trait