Literature DB >> 33047103

Meeting Women's Requests for Intrauterine Device and Contraceptive Implant Discontinuation: An Exploratory Survey of Physicians.

Bliss Kaneshiro1, ZoeAnn Kon1, Mary Tschann1, Amanda Williams2, Kasey Kajiwara1, Reni Soon1.   

Abstract

Long acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants, can support an individual in meeting their reproductive goals by allowing them to prevent pregnancy effectively. These devices can also limit an individual's control over reproduction because they generally require an in-person visit to a health care provider for removal. Returning for another visit may be logistically challenging for many individuals who may need to arrange for transportation, childcare, or take time off from work. Effectively negotiating with a provider to request removal may be additionally challenging for medically underserved and disenfranchised people who may not feel empowered to do so. The objective of this study was to assess providers' willingness to honor patients' requests for IUD and contraceptive implant removal on the day of the request. A survey was conducted in which clinicians were presented with scenarios of women requesting IUD or implant removal. Clinicians were asked what they were most likely to do. A total of 105 clinicians were surveyed. The responses of 60 clinicians who inserted IUDs and 57 who provided the contraceptive implant were included in the analysis. When asked about same-day removal of an IUD or implant from a dissatisfied patient who requested removal, 40% stated they would remove the implant, and 57% stated they would remove the IUD on the day of the request. Findings from this study suggest many clinicians would be unwilling or unable to accommodate a patient's request for device removal at the time of their visit. This delay or refusal represents a significant barrier for patients and has implications for reproductive autonomy that should be further explored. ©Copyright 2020 by University Health Partners of Hawai‘i (UHP Hawai‘i).

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraceptive coercion; discontinuation; implant; intrauterine device; reproductive justice

Year:  2020        PMID: 33047103      PMCID: PMC7547180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf        ISSN: 2641-5216


  15 in total

1.  Beyond Coercion: Let Us Grapple With Bias.

Authors:  Melissa L Gilliam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 4.  Contraception for adolescents.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Gina S Sucato
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

6.  Quality and Content of Patient-Provider Communication About Contraception: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Nora Anderson; Eric Vittinghoff; Kevin Grumbach; Kira Levy; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion.

Authors:  Ann M Stanek; Paula H Bednarek; Mark D Nichols; Jeffrey T Jensen; Alison B Edelman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  ACOG Committee opinion no. 554: reproductive and sexual coercion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  "She just told me to leave it": Women's experiences discussing early elective IUD removal.

Authors:  Jennifer R Amico; Ariana H Bennett; Alison Karasz; Marji Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Patient-Perceived Autonomy and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use: A Qualitative Assessment in a Midwestern, University Community.

Authors:  Carley Zeal; Jenny A Higgins; Shaunna R Newton
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2018-03-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Intrauterine device self-removal practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among family planning clinics.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Fadila Traore; Jennifer R Amico
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.051

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.