Manil D Chouhan1, Stuart A Taylor1, Alan Bainbridge2, Simon Walker-Samuel3, Nathan Davies4, Steve Halligan1, Mark F Lythgoe3, Rajeshwar P Mookerjee5. 1. Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, UCL, University College London (UCL), London, UK. 2. Department of Medical Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK. 3. Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, UCL, University College London (UCL), London, UK. 4. Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, UCL, Royal Free Hospital, University College London (UCL), NW3 2PF, London, UK. 5. Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, UCL, Royal Free Hospital, University College London (UCL), NW3 2PF, London, UK. r.mookerjee@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Effects of liver disease on portal venous (PV), hepatic arterial (HA), total liver blood flow (TLBF), and cardiac function are poorly understood. Terlipressin modulates PV flow but effects on HA, TLBF, and sepsis/acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)-induced haemodynamic changes are poorly characterised. In this study, we investigated the effects of terlipressin and sepsis/ACLF on hepatic haemodynamics and cardiac function in a rodent cirrhosis model using caval subtraction phase-contrast (PC) MRI and cardiac cine MRI. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 18 bile duct-ligated (BDL), n = 16 sham surgery controls) underwent caval subtraction PCMRI to estimate TLBF and HA flow and short-axis cardiac cine MRI for systolic function at baseline, following terlipressin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion, to model ACLF. RESULTS: All baseline hepatic haemodynamic/cardiac systolic function parameters (except heart rate and LV mass) were significantly different in BDL rats. Following terlipressin, baseline PV flow (sham 181.4 ± 12.1 ml/min/100 g; BDL 68.5 ± 10.1 ml/min/100 g) reduced (sham - 90.3 ± 11.1 ml/min/100 g, p < 0.0001; BDL - 31.0 ± 8.0 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.02), sham baseline HA flow (33.0 ± 11.3 ml/min/100 g) increased (+ 92.8 ± 21.3 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.0003), but BDL baseline HA flow (83.8 ml/min/100 g) decreased (- 34.4 ± 7.5 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.11). Sham baseline TLBF (214.3 ± 16.7 ml/min/100 g) was maintained (+ 2.5 ± 14.0 ml/min/100 g, p > 0.99) but BDL baseline TLBF (152.3 ± 18.7 ml/min/100 g) declined (- 65.5 ± 8.5 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.0004). Following LPS, there were significant differences between cohort and change in HA fraction (p = 0.03) and TLBF (p = 0.01) with BDL baseline HA fraction (46.2 ± 4.6%) reducing (- 20.9 ± 7.5%, p = 0.03) but sham baseline HA fraction (38.2 ± 2.0%) remaining unchanged (+ 2.9 ± 6.1%, p > 0.99). Animal cohort and change in systolic function interactions were significant only for heart rate (p = 0.01) and end-diastolic volume (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Caval subtraction PCMRI and cardiac MRI in a rodent model of cirrhosis demonstrate significant baseline hepatic haemodynamic/cardiac differences, failure of the HA buffer response post-terlipressin and an altered HA fraction response in sepsis, informing potential translation to ACLF patients. KEY POINTS: Caval subtraction phase-contrast and cardiac MRI demonstrate: • Significant differences between cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic rodent hepatic blood flow and cardiac systolic function at baseline. • Failure of the hepatic arterial buffer response in cirrhotic rodents in response to terlipressin. • Reductions in hepatic arterial flow fraction in the setting of acute-on-chronic liver failure.
OBJECTIVES: Effects of liver disease on portal venous (PV), hepatic arterial (HA), total liver blood flow (TLBF), and cardiac function are poorly understood. Terlipressin modulates PV flow but effects on HA, TLBF, and sepsis/acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)-induced haemodynamic changes are poorly characterised. In this study, we investigated the effects of terlipressin and sepsis/ACLF on hepatic haemodynamics and cardiac function in a rodent cirrhosis model using caval subtraction phase-contrast (PC) MRI and cardiac cine MRI. METHODS:Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 18 bile duct-ligated (BDL), n = 16 sham surgery controls) underwent caval subtraction PCMRI to estimate TLBF and HA flow and short-axis cardiac cine MRI for systolic function at baseline, following terlipressin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion, to model ACLF. RESULTS: All baseline hepatic haemodynamic/cardiac systolic function parameters (except heart rate and LV mass) were significantly different in BDL rats. Following terlipressin, baseline PV flow (sham 181.4 ± 12.1 ml/min/100 g; BDL 68.5 ± 10.1 ml/min/100 g) reduced (sham - 90.3 ± 11.1 ml/min/100 g, p < 0.0001; BDL - 31.0 ± 8.0 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.02), sham baseline HA flow (33.0 ± 11.3 ml/min/100 g) increased (+ 92.8 ± 21.3 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.0003), but BDL baseline HA flow (83.8 ml/min/100 g) decreased (- 34.4 ± 7.5 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.11). Sham baseline TLBF (214.3 ± 16.7 ml/min/100 g) was maintained (+ 2.5 ± 14.0 ml/min/100 g, p > 0.99) but BDL baseline TLBF (152.3 ± 18.7 ml/min/100 g) declined (- 65.5 ± 8.5 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.0004). Following LPS, there were significant differences between cohort and change in HA fraction (p = 0.03) and TLBF (p = 0.01) with BDL baseline HA fraction (46.2 ± 4.6%) reducing (- 20.9 ± 7.5%, p = 0.03) but sham baseline HA fraction (38.2 ± 2.0%) remaining unchanged (+ 2.9 ± 6.1%, p > 0.99). Animal cohort and change in systolic function interactions were significant only for heart rate (p = 0.01) and end-diastolic volume (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Caval subtraction PCMRI and cardiac MRI in a rodent model of cirrhosis demonstrate significant baseline hepatic haemodynamic/cardiac differences, failure of the HA buffer response post-terlipressin and an altered HA fraction response in sepsis, informing potential translation to ACLF patients. KEY POINTS: Caval subtraction phase-contrast and cardiac MRI demonstrate: • Significant differences between cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic rodent hepatic blood flow and cardiac systolic function at baseline. • Failure of the hepatic arterial buffer response in cirrhotic rodents in response to terlipressin. • Reductions in hepatic arterial flow fraction in the setting of acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Authors: Antonio Facciorusso; Apoorva K Chandar; M Hassan Murad; Larry J Prokop; Nicola Muscatiello; Patrick S Kamath; Siddharth Singh Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-12-02
Authors: Johannes Riegler; King K Cheung; Yiu Fung Man; Jon O Cleary; Anthony N Price; Mark F Lythgoe Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Andrew S Allegretti; Mads Israelsen; Aleksander Krag; Manol Jovani; Alison H Goldin; Allison R Schulman; Rachel W Winter; Lise Lotte Gluud Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-14
Authors: Manil D Chouhan; Heather E Fitzke; Alan Bainbridge; David Atkinson; Steve Halligan; Nathan Davies; Mark F Lythgoe; Rajeshwar P Mookerjee; Alex Menys; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-06-20