| Literature DB >> 33042770 |
Ruichao Zhang1, Qi Xu2, Suo Bai1, Jun Hai3, Li Cheng1, Guoqiang Xu3, Yong Qin1.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented human and health crisis. And the shortage of protective equipment, especially the personal protective disposable surgical masks, has been a great challenge. Here, we developed an effective and simple scheme to prolong the lifetime of disposable surgical masks without changing their current structure, which is beneficial to solve the shortage of personal masks. After electrifying the meltblown PP filter by the new-developed single-electrode-based sliding triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) charge replenishment (NGCR) technology, the processed filter is bipolar charged and has a filtration efficiency beyond 95% for the particulate matter (PM) ranging from PM0.3 to PM10.0. Further, we demonstrate the 80 °C dry heating is an effective decontamination method. This method is compatible with single-electrode-based sliding TENG charge replenishment technology. The 80 °C dry heating and the NGCR technology can make up an effective regeneration procedure for the mask. Even after ten cycles of simulated 4 h wearing process and such regeneration procedure, the filtration efficiency of the disposable surgical masks PM0.3 is still higher than 95%.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Decontamination; Disposable surgical masks; Filtration; Meltblown nonwoven filter; Triboelectric nanogenerator
Year: 2020 PMID: 33042770 PMCID: PMC7534667 DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Energy ISSN: 2211-2855 Impact factor: 17.881
Fig. 1Particulate matter filtration test and performance of the meltblown PP filter. a) Filtration efficiencies of uncharged disposable surgical mask and different layer of the disposable surgical mask for different-sized PM; The inset is a schematic showing the basic structure of the disposable surgical mask. b) Filtration efficiencies of particle numbers of different-sized PM using the before charging and after charging meltblown PP filter. c) The surface potential of the meltblown PP filter by ESVM-measured that the charged effects are maintained during the period of measurement. Error bar represents the standard deviation of ten replicate measurements. d) 16 h test of the filtration efficiency for PM0.3 of the meltblown PP filter.
Fig. 2Meltblown PP filter charging design and working principle a) Schematic illustration of meltblown PP filter and PTFE film as contact layers in sliding mode case Ⅰ and case Ⅱ. b) Schematic diagrams that illustrate the process of capturing charged meltblown PP filter case Ⅰ and case Ⅱ. c) The short-circuit current of case Ⅱ. d) The open-circuit voltage of case Ⅱ. e) The surface potential of the filter front side and rear side. Error bar represents the standard deviation of ten replicate measurements. f) The filtration efficiency of the case Ⅰ and case Ⅱ of meltblown PP filter for PM0.3–PM10.0.
Fig. 3Characterization of wear resistance. a), b), c) Microscopic morphologies of the meltblown PP filter in top-down viewed SEM images at different friction times (scale bar: 200 µm); the inset is a higher resolution SEM image of meltblown PP filter (scale bar: 20 µm). d) FTIR spectra of meltblown PP filter of different friction times.
Fig. 4Performance enhancement of meltblown PP filter after applying the NGCR technology. a) The surface potential of the meltblown PP filter front side with different friction times with NGCR technology. b) 12 h test of the surface potential of the meltblown PP filter. Error bar represents the standard deviation of ten replicate measurements. c) The filtration efficiency of the before charging and after charging meltblown PP filter with NGCR technology. d) The filtration efficiency of the charged meltblown PP filter and disposable surgical mask with NGCR technology charged meltblown PP filter.
Fig. 5Summary of the decontamination method and effect on meltblown PP filter performance. a) Photographs of S. aureus colonies on agar plates after co-culturing for 24 h a) control group; b) 75% alcohol immersing; c) 80 °C water bathing; d) 80 °C dry heating; e)–h) Apparent water contact angles of meltblown PP filter with respect to various decontamination methods. i) The front side surface potential of the meltblown PP filter for the before charging, after charging and after different decontamination methods. j) PM0.3 filtration efficiency of the meltblown PP filter for the before charging, after charging and after different decontamination methods. Error bar represents the standard deviation of ten replicate measurements.
Fig. 6Regeneration test and filtration performance. a) Filtration efficiency of the pristine uncharged meltblown PP filter regenerated for 1–10 times. b) Filtration efficiency of the pristine charged meltblown PP filter regenerated for 1–10 times. The inset is the filtration efficiency of the pristine charged meltblown PP filter for PM0.3 after simulated breath moisture test for 0–4 times.