Amita Vaidya1, Nadia Ayat1, Megan Buford1, Helen Wang1, Aman Shankardass1, Yiqing Zhao2, Hannah Gilmore3, Zhenghe Wang2,4, Zheng-Rong Lu1,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 2. Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 4. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in men and women combined in the US 1. The 5-year survival for CRC cases in 2013 decreased from 88.1% at stage I to 12.6% at stage IV of diagnosis 2. Multiple studies and clinical trials have proven significantly reduced CRC mortality from preventive screening 3, 4. Although highly treatable with chemotherapy and surgery in early stages, 80-90% metastatic CRC is inoperable at diagnosis and requires neoadjuvant chemotherapy 5, 6. Furthermore, development of multidrug resistance can also lead to relapse and distant metastases, which are incurable. Current standards for CRC treatment monitoring follow the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) guidelines 7, which are limited due to their reliance on tumor anatomical size, lesion irregularities leading to subjective opinions, and delays in detection of negative tumor response to therapies 8, 9. To improve the outcomes of chemo- or targeted therapies and to enable decision making for adaptive interventions, non-invasive and repeated imaging for accurate detection and surveillance of invasive, drug-resistant tumor populations is imperative.Clinical CRC diagnostics utilize blood markers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), which suffer from low sensitivity and specificity 10. Liquid biopsies that measure mutational burden from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are reflective of inter-patient and inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity 11, and are fast gaining momentum in the diagnostic and prognostic arenas 12; however, they cannot provide spatial information on neoplastic lesions, rendering diagnostic imaging indispensable. A common imaging modality for CRC treatment monitoring is positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), usually with the [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) radiotracer, which provides functional and metabolic data, but is limited by radiation exposure and confounding factors like cell density, hyperglycemia, and poor resolution 5, 13, 14. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) employs Gd(III)-based contrast agents (GBCAs) that shorten T1 of tissues, and T1-weighted imaging is also routinely used for diagnosis and surveillance of CRC 15-18. This current clinical assessment is fraught with serious challenges in that, clinical non-targeted GBCAs are non-specific and unable to distinguish aggressive drug-resistant tumor species from the sensitive ones; and repeated administration of GBCAs is associated with potential safety concerns of Gd-based toxicity and brain deposition 19-21. Given the extensive molecular and phenotypic plasticity of CRC tumors 22, it is essential to develop molecular imaging agents and strategies that can accurately identify the trajectory of CRC during oncotherapy, based on alterations in key biologically relevant microenvironmental characteristics of individual tumors and tumor niches.To date, the discipline of molecular cancer imaging has witnessed a limited number of studies, possibly due to the dearth of reliable biomarkers. Although colon cancer-secreted protein 2 (CCSP-2) was used as a molecular marker for near-infrared fluorescence imaging of primary tumors, patient-derived xenografts, and liver metastases, this marker is only specific to colon adenomas 23. Among the widely reported magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) studies 24, MRI-based detection of iron oxide nanoparticles targeting humantumor antigen underglycosylated mucin 1 (uMUC1) 25, and nanoaggregation of probe scaffolds specific to pro-apoptotic caspases 26, has been used to monitor chemotherapeutic response of colon xenografts. Vascular volume fraction (VVF), K-Ras mutation, EGFR, and αvβ3 have been used as surrogate markers for MRI of CRC with some success 27-29. Novel theranostic approaches, combining MRI, DCE-MRI and diverse therapies like photodynamic therapy and MXene-based nanoplatforms, have also been reported for other models of cancer 30-32. However, MR molecular imaging (MRMI) for non-invasive assessment and treatment monitoring of drug-resistant CRC has never been performed before. To address this challenge, to circumvent the immune and translational hurdles of MNPs, and to potentially target a broader range of drug-resistant cancers, we developed MRMI strategies to target the abundantly expressed oncoprotein extradomain-B fibronectin (EDB-FN) in the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) 33-35.EDB-FN, an oncofetal isoform of fibronectin 36, is overexpressed in a multitude of cancers 37-41. EDB-FN is also elevated in CRC and is associated with angiogenesis, growth, and tissue remodeling 42, 43. Literature studies show that even within the same cancer type, EDB-FN is preferentially upregulated in the more invasive cell and tumor subtypes, compared to the indolent ones 40, 44, 45. This specific spatial and temporal expression of EDB-FN in malignancies and its absence in healthy tissues renders it an attractive target for molecular imaging and targeted therapy 46-50. We previously designed and developed an EDB-FN-targeted GBCA, ZD2-N3-Gd(HP-DO3A) (MT218), by conjugating the EDB-FN-specific peptide ZD2 to the clinical GBCA Gadoteridol 51, 52, and demonstrated its ability to facilitate efficient MRMI for risk-stratification of EDB-FN-rich prostate and breast cancers, even at doses as low as 20 µmol/kg (1/5th of the clinical dose), highlighting its translational applications and superior safety profile 51, 53. Despite these and other EDB-FN-related studies by independent groups, the expression profiles of EDB-FN in drug-resistant CRC have never been examined. In addition, the feasibility of using EDB-FN as a molecular marker for assessing therapeutic response of drug-resistant CRC remains unexplored.Here, we demonstrate, for the first time, that MRMI of EDB-FN with MT218 can facilitate efficient non-invasive assessment and treatment response monitoring of drug-resistant CRC tumors that exhibit significantly elevated EDB-FN levels. Subcutaneously implanted drug-resistant CRC xenografts showed robust signal enhancement with 40 µmol/kg dose of MT218, compared to their respective drug-sensitive counterparts. MRMI of EDB-FN was also used to successfully monitor the negative response of drug-resistant CRC tumors to the targeted pan-AKT inhibitor, MK2206-HCl 54, indicating the potential of EDB-FN as a therapy-predictive marker. Moreover, elevated EDB-FN correlated with poor prognosis of colon cancerpatients. To date, this is the first and only report providing compelling in vivo evidence for exploiting drug resistance-mediated upregulation of EDB-FN as a molecular marker for imaging and therapeutic monitoring of CRC.
Methods
Cell culture
CRC cell lines DLD-1 and RKO were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Their respective drug-resistant derivatives, DLD1-DR and RKO-DR were a kind gift from the lab of Zhenghe Wang (CWRU, Cleveland, OH). DLD1-DR cells were developed with resistance to 5ʹ-fluorouracil (5ʹ-FU) (Millipore-Sigma, St. Louis, MO), to an IC50 of 210.6 µM vs IC50 of 2.5 µM for DLD-1 cells, as previously described 55. RKO-DR cells were developed with resistance to combined treatment of 10 µM 5ʹ-FU and 15 µM CB-839, a glutaminase inhibitor (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX), as shown in . The DLD-1 and DLD1-DR cells were cultured in McCoy's 5A medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The RKO and RKO-DR cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Millipore-Sigma). Both the media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 Units/mL Penicillin/Streptomycin. All the cells were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
Western blot
Total protein extraction was performed by treating CRC cell pellets with cell lysis buffer (1:1 mix of protease inhibitor in PBS and Laemmli buffer), followed by incubation at 100 °C for 10 min and then centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration of the extracts was determined using a Lowry assay kit, according to manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Equal amount of protein extracts (40 µg) was loaded on to SDS-PAGE for electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The following primary antibodies (1:1000 dilution, overnight incubation at 4 °C) were used: anti-MDR1, anti-E-cadherin and, anti-β-Actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and anti-N-cadherin (1:500 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Following secondary antibody incubation (1:2000 dilution for 2 h), the membranes were developed using Signal Fire Plus ECL Kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and imaged on ChemiDoc™ XRS+ Imager (Bio-Rad). The band intensities were quantified using the softwares FIJI (FIJI is Just ImageJ) and ImageLab (Bio-Rad).
qRT-PCR
Total RNA extraction from the CRC cells was performed using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), according to manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was generated by reverse transcription with the miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen) and qPCR was performed using SyBr Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative gene expression was measured by the 2-ΔΔCt method. β-Actin was used as the housekeeping gene. The following primer sequences (IDT, Coralville, IA) were used- EDB-FN: Fwd 5ʹ-CCG CTA AAC TCT TCC ACC ATT A-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-AGC CCT GTG ACT GTG TAG TA-3ʹ; FN1: Fwd 5ʹ-CCT GGA GTA CAA TGT CAG TG-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-GGT GGA GCC CAG GTG ACA-3ʹ; β-Actin: Fwd 5ʹ-CAT CCA CGA AAC TAC CTT CAA CTC C-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-GAG CCG CCG ATC CAC ACG-3ʹ; MDR1: Fwd 5ʹ-TTG CTG CTT ACA TTC AGG TTT CA-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-AGC CTA TCT CCT GTC GCA TTA-3ʹ; E-cad: Fwd 5ʹ-GTC AGT TCA GAC TCC AGC CC-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-AAA TTC ACT CTG CCC AGG ACG -3ʹ; and N-cad: Fwd 5ʹ-CAC TGC TCA GGA CCC AGA T-3ʹ and Rev 5ʹ-TAA GCC GAG TGA TGG TCC-3ʹ.
Invasion and migration assays
Standard transwell assays were performed to assess the migration and invasion of CRC cells. To test migration, 100,000 CRC cells (starved overnight) were plated in transwell inserts (VWR, Radnor, PA) placed in a 24-well plate containing FBS-rich media. The next day, the inserts were internally swabbed to remove the non-migrated cells. The migrated cells at the bottom of the inserts were fixed with 10% formalin (10 min) and then stained with 0.1% crystal violet (20 min). Excess stain was washed and the transwells were dried overnight before imaging on the Moticam T2 camera with 10X objective lens. To test invasion, the transwell inserts were coated with 1 mg/mL CorningTM MatrigelTM Membrane Matrix (Corning, NY), to assess the ability of the CRC cells to invade through the Matrigel layer, in addition to the porous membrane of the inserts. Approximately 200,000 CRC cells (starved overnight) were plated for this assay and processed as mentioned above. The invading and migration cells were quantified using FIJI software.
Matrigel 3D culture and ZD2-Cy5.5 staining
The ability of CRC cells to grow in 3D was tested using Matrigel culture. About 900,000 CRC cells were plated in 4-well microslides (Ibidi, Fitchburg, WI) coated with a thick layer of CorningTM MatrigelTM Membrane Matrix. Tumor spheroid/organoid formation was monitored and photographed for up to 4 days using the Moticam T2 camera with 10X objective lens. To test EDB-FN expression, the tumor spheroids were incubated with 100 nM ZD2-Cy5.5 and 5 µg/mL Hoechst-33342 for 20-30 min. Excess dyes were washed thrice with PBS and fluorescence imaging was performed on Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (Japan), with 10X and 20X objective lenses. Image processing was done using FIJI.
Mouse models
Nude athymic mice (6-week-old nu/nu females) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, MA) and housed in the Animal Facility at CWRU. All the animal experiments were performed according to the protocol approved by the IACUC of CWRU. For assessment of drug resistance, 2 drug-resistant and 2 non-drug-resistant models were set up. About 3-4 x 106 DLD-1, RKO, DLD1-DR, and RKO-DR cells suspended in Matrigel-PBS mixture (1:1) were subcutaneously injected in the left flanks of nude mice (100 µL per mouse, 5 mice per group x 4 models = 20 mice). After 9 days when the tumors reached 100-200 mm3, MRMI was performed on the 4 xenograft models with 40 µmol/kg dose of MT218. The animals were then euthanized, and the tumors were harvested for post-mortem histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC).For therapeutic monitoring, 3-4 x 106 DLD1-DR cells suspended in Matrigel-PBS mixture (1:1) were subcutaneously injected in the left flanks of 10 nude mice (100 µL per mouse, mice labeled TM1-TM10). Tumor volumes were monitored and measured once a week using a Vernier caliper. When the average tumor volumes reached 100 mm3, mice were randomized into 2 groups of n=5: vehicle (mice# TM1, TM3, TM4, TM5, & TM10) and treated (mice# TM2, TM6, TM7, TM8, & TM9). Once a week, mice in the treated group received MK2206-HCl (100 mg/kg) and those in the vehicle group were injected with equivalent volume of DMSO, as described previously 56. After 3 weeks of treatment, tumor volumes increased over 1000 mm3 and the experiment was terminated. The animals were then euthanized, and the tumors were harvested for post-mortem histology and IHC. Tumor volumes were calculated as [(Width)2 x Length]/2.
MRMI of EDB-FN with MT218
MT218 [ZD2-N3-Gd(HP-DO3A)] was synthesized as previously described 51. Briefly, click reaction between alkynyl-ZD2 and N3-Gd(HP-DO3A) was performed in the presence of CuSO4 and ascorbate at room temperature, followed by FLASH chromatography purification and validation of MT218 by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (m.w. 1443). For assessment of drug resistance and therapeutic monitoring, MRMI was performed in a 3T MRS 3000 scanner (MR Solutions, Surrey, UK) with a mouse short quad coil. The mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and tail vein catheter was setup. T1-weighted MR images were obtained before (pre-contrast) and 25 min after injection (post-contrast) of 40 µmol/kg dose of MT218. The following two sequences were used with respiratory gating: axial fast spin echo (FSE) (TR = 305 ms, TE = 11 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 40 mm x 40 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice number = 15, Nav = 2, matrix = 256 x 256) and coronal FSE (TR = 305 ms, TE = 11 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 90 mm x 90 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice number = 20, Nav = 1, matrix = 248 x 512). For therapeutic monitoring, baseline MRMI (week 1) and endpoint MRMI (week 4) were performed using the aforementioned sequences with 40 µmol/kg dose of MT218 on the 10 mice bearing DLD1-DR tumors. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated as (mean tumor intensity - mean muscle intensity)/standard deviation of noise. Image and CNR analysis was performed using FIJI software. ROIs were drawn around whole tumors, 2-4 muscle regions, and background. CNR analysis was performed independently by 2 individuals, once blinded, to avoid bias.
Immunohistochemistry in human and mouse tissues
De-identified and de-classified human tissue samples, including primary colon adenocarcinoma (n=6), liver metastasis (n=4), and their corresponding normal adjacent tissues, (n=6+4), were acquired from the Human Tissue Procurement Facility at CWRU. Dissected mousetumor tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 1 µm slices. Staining and IHC services were provided by the Tissue Resources Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and University Hospitals of Cleveland. The slides were stained with H&E to visualize morphology. IHC was performed using anti-EDB-FN antibody G4 clone (1:100 dilution; Absolute Antibody, UK). All the slides were reviewed by a certified pathologist. IHC images were obtained using Bx61VS slide scanner microscope (Olympus) with 40X objective lens and processed in OlyVIA software.
Gene data and statistical analyses
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (RFS) data for correlation with EDB-FN expression (transcript ID: ENST00000432072.6) were derived in GEPIA2 57. This web server [http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/#general] evaluates tumor/normal data and normal tissue data (transcript per million) from TCGA and GTEx databases, respectively, and employs Log-rank or Mantel-Cox test, for statistical survival analysis and Cox PH Model for hazards ratio (HR) calculation.All the experiments were independently replicated at least 3 times (n = 3), unless otherwise stated. Data are represented as mean ± sem. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.03. Data between two groups (normal distribution) was compared using unpaired t-test. Otherwise, non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test) was used, as stated in the relevant figure legends. Time course MRMI data for multiple cell lines was analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's correction. p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Acquired drug resistance enhances migration and invasion of CRC cells
Two independent drug-resistant CRC cell lines were generated: DLD1-DR by long-term 5ʹ-FU treatment in DLD-1 cells and RKO-DR by combined treatment of 5ʹ-FU and CB-839 in RKO-DR cells, and evaluated for their biological properties. The morphology of cells grown in 2D and 3D cultures was monitored by phase contrast microscopy. While DLD-1 cells showed regular epithelial morphology in 2D culture and multicellular grape-like clusters in 3D culture (Figure , DLD1-DR cells formed islets in 2D culture and compact spheroids in 3D culture. Monolayer cultures of RKO and RKO-DR cells showed no overt morphological differences (Figure . On the other hand, in 3D culture, RKO-DR cells readily formed tumor spheroids, both compact and aggregates, while RKO cells were unable to form spheroids. These results demonstrate the diverse morphological variation, both in monolayer and 3D culture, between the CRC cell lines.Next, drug resistance-induced molecular changes in the signaling pathways of the CRC cells were analyzed by western blotting and qRT-PCR. Since drug efflux pumps and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) are implicated in the development of drug resistance 58, the protein and mRNA expression of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), and EMT markers (E-cadherin and N-cadherin) were determined. At the protein level, DLD1-DR cells showed significant upregulation of MDR-1 and moderate EMT, with modest decrease in E-cad and increase in N-cad levels, over DLD-1 cells (Figure . At the mRNA level, the DLD1-DR cells showed 4-fold increase in MDR-1, and no changes in mRNA levels of E-cad and N-cad (Figure . On the other hand, RKO-DR cells showed significantly elevated MDR1 and E-cad at both protein (Figure and mRNA (Figure levels, over RKO cells. The N-cad protein expression was also elevated in RKO-DR cells, suggesting the existence of a mix of epithelial and mesenchymal cells or a partial/hybrid E-M phenotype in RKO-DR cells.The functional effects of acquired drug resistance in the CRC cells were evaluated by testing their migratory potential. As shown in Figure , DLD1-DR and RKO-DR cells exhibited increased migration through transwell membranes as well as increased invasion through an additional layer of Matrigel coated on the transwell membranes. Taken together, these results suggest that irrespective of the distinct morphological and molecular changes caused by acquisition of drug resistance, CRC cells gain significant invasive advantages over their parent counterparts.
Acquired drug resistance is associated with elevated EDB-FN expression in CRC cells
We previously showed that EDB-FN is overexpressed in drug-resistant, invasive breast cancer 40, 45 and aggressive prostate cancer 39, 51. Here, we evaluated whether development of drug resistance upregulates EDB-FN expression in the CRC cells, using qRT-PCR and EDB-FN-specific peptide probe ZD2-Cy5.5 52 in 2D and 3D cultures, respectively.As shown in Figure , both DLD-1 and DLD1-DR cell lines expressed EDB-FN, evident in their ZD2-Cy5.5 binding. However, the DLD1-DR cells showed brighter fluorescence signal, indicating higher ZD2-Cy5.5 binding, which was confirmed by the 3-fold upregulation of EDB-FN mRNA level over DLD-1 cells (Figure . Total FN1 expression was also found to increase with drug resistance in DLD1-DR cells (ca. 3-fold, Figure ). Similarly, while both RKO and RKO-DR cells secreted EDB-FN, its expression was significantly higher in the latter, reflected in the intense ZD2-Cy5.5 staining (Figure and approximately 4.5-fold increase in EDB-FN mRNA (Figure , over the former. Total FN1 was only increased by 1.5-fold in the RKO-DR cells (Figure . These results demonstrate that acquired drug resistance in CRC cells is associated with EDB-FN overexpression.
Contrast-enhanced MRMI of EDB-FN using MT218 facilitates effective differential diagnosis of drug-resistant CRC tumors
To determine whether EDB-FN overexpression can be used as a molecular marker to differentiate between non-resistant and drug-resistant CRC tumors, MRMI was performed using EDB-FN-targeting contrast agent MT218 51 in athymic nu/nu mice bearing subcutaneous xenografts of DLD-1, DLD1-DR, RKO, and RKO-DR. T1-weighted coronal and axial images were acquired before and 25 min after injection of 40 µmol/kg MT218. We previously showed that this subclinical dose of MT218 is just as effective as the standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of MT218 and the clinical contrast agent Gadoteridol 53.Preliminary time course analysis showed robust enhancement and increased CNRs up to 35 min post-injection of MT218 in both the DLD-1 ( and RKO ( tumor models. Since the peak enhancement was observed between 20-35 min, the 25 min time point was selected for the subsequent assessment of drug resistance. MRMI of EDB-FN using MT218 resulted in signal enhancement in the non-resistant DLD-1 and RKO tumors (Figure , with 1.53- and 1.4-fold increase in CNRs over the pre-contrast, (Figure , respectively. The drug-resistant DLD1-DR and RKO-DRtumors exhibited significantly stronger signal enhancement, reflected in the 3.3- and 2.6-fold higher CNRs over pre-contrast (Figure . Importantly, this signal enhancement was more robust than in their non-resistant counterparts, resulting in 2.2- and 1.8-fold higher CNRs (i.e., 120% and 84% increase) over the non-resistant DLD-1 and RKO tumors, respectively (Figure . The mice were euthanized post-imaging and their tumor tissues were processed for H&E staining and EDB-FN IHC with G4 antibody. As shown in Figure , H&E staining did not show significant differences between the drug-resistant and non-resistant CRC tumors, with both demonstrating high grade, poorly differentiated, and mitotically active pleomorphic cancer cells. IHC for EDB-FN exhibited stronger staining in DLD1-DR (Figure and RKO-DR (Figure tumors, compared to that in the DLD-1 and RKO tumors, respectively. EDB-FN staining was localized in both the tumor cells and the elongated spindle-like interspersed cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), denoted by the red and black arrows, respectively. This IHC data correlated with the signal enhancement and CNRs observed in the four models, demonstrating that MRMI of EDB-FN with a reduced dose of MT218 can facilitate non-invasive assessment of drug resistance in CRC models.
MRMI of EDB-FN using MT218 facilitates therapeutic response monitoring of drug-resistant CRC tumors
Following differential diagnosis of drug-resistant CRC tumors, the potential of MRMI of EDB-FN for non-invasive assessment of therapeutic response was determined in DLD1-DR-bearing mice treated with MK2206-HCl, a pan-AKT inhibitor. Figure shows the schematic of the timeline of therapeutic regimen and MRMI for therapeutic efficacy monitoring. One week after tumor implantation, baseline MRMI was performed, followed by randomization of the mice into vehicle (DMSO-treated: TM1, TM3, TM4, TM5, TM10) and treated (MK2206-treated: TM2, TM6, TM7, TM8, TM9) groups. Mice were treated once a week for 3 weeks, and endpoint MRMI was performed at week 4 due to high tumor burden, followed by post-mortem histology. Tumor volumes were monitored once a week. Figure shows the progression of tumor growth over the 4-week period. The average tumor volumes of both vehicle and treated groups increased significantly, from 97.7 ± 8.14 mm3 to 813.4 ± 259.7 mm3 and from 110.5 ± 11.97 mm3 to 1249.7 ± 199.3 mm3, respectively. Although no significant difference was found between the average tumor volumes of the vehicle and treated groups (p=0.22) at week 4, individual mice in the latter group showed visibly worse and larger tumors, indicating that the drug-resistant tumors did not respond to therapy. The tumor volumes of individual mice were also monitored (Figure to correlate with the endpoint MRMI signal and EDB-FN expression. Each mouse (labeled from TM1-TM10) showed significant increase in tumor volumes, to a lesser or greater extent.The tumor growth was monitored with endpoint MRMI for EDB-FN using MT218. As shown in Figure , each mouse in the vehicle group showed signal enhancement compared to pre-contrast, when baseline MRMI was performed. After 3 weeks of DMSO injections, all the 5 mice showed signal enhancement in endpoint MRMI; with mice # TM3 and TM5 showing increased signal enhancement and tumor size, compared to the other 3 mice (TM1, TM4, and TM10), Figure . Quantification of this data showed a consistent trend, with mice # TM3 and TM5 showing increase in CNRs from week 1 to 4, and mice # TM1, TM4, and TM10 showing decrease in CNRs from week 1 to 4 (Figure . The MRMI signal also correlated with the increase in their tumor volumes, where mice # TM3 and TM5 showed a rapid increase in tumor volumes compared to mice # TM1, TM4, and TM10 (Figure . No significant difference was found between the average CNRs at week 1 and 4 for the vehicle group (Figure . Postmortem histology and IHC for EDB-FN showed stronger G4 staining in TM3 than TM10, demonstrating MRMI of EDB-FN with MT218 correlates with the endogenous tumor EDB-FN expression (Figure .As for the treated group, each of the 5 mice showed high signal enhancement over pre-contrast during baseline MRMI (Figure . Despite 3 weeks of treatment, the drug-resistant DLD1-DR tumors failed to respond to therapy and increased in size with increased signal enhancement over pre-contrast (Figure , reflected in the elevated CNRs for the individual mice from week 1 to week 4 (Figure . Among the 5 mice, mouse # TM7 showed the highest signal enhancement and CNR, and the largest tumor volume (Figure . On the other hand, mice # TM2, TM6, TM8, and TM9 showed increased CNRs and tumor volumes from week 1 to 4, but no correlating pattern between the two was detected. The average tumor CNRs in the treated group increased significantly from week 1 to 4 (Figure , confirming that the drug-resistant tumors failed to respond to therapy, and performed worse than the vehicle group. Postmortem histology and IHC for EDB-FN showed strong G4 staining for the tumor in mouse # TM7, compared to TM9 (Figure as well as vehicle-treated mice # TM3 and TM10 (Figure , further corroborating the direct correlation of EDB-FN expression and MRMI-based monitoring. While the week 4 average CNR of the treated group was higher than that of the vehicle group, it was not statistically significant (p=0.055, ). Taken together, these results demonstrate that MRMI of EDB-FN with MT218 can facilitate non-invasive therapeutic monitoring of drug-resistant CRC tumors.
EDB-FN is overexpressed in human colon adenocarcinoma and is correlated with poor patient survival
To assess the feasibility of using MRMI of EDB-FN in CRC patients, the expression of EDB-FN was analyzed in representative human specimens of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), metastatic livers, and their corresponding normal adjacent tissues. Primary COAD tumors were found to demonstrate strong EDB-FN expression in both non-treated (Figure and treated (Figure patients, with negligible expression in the corresponding normal adjacent tissues (NAT). On the other hand, COAD hepatic metastases showed differential EDB-FN levels, with moderate staining in non-treated patient (Figure and intense staining in treated patient (Figure , and no staining in normal adjacent liver. In regards to the pattern, most of the EDB-FN staining was observed in the stromal and cancer-associated fibroblasts (black arrows), and some in the tumor cells (red arrows), in the primary and metastatic sites. Moreover, analysis of RNA-Seq data from TCGA and GTEx databases revealed that increased EDB-FN levels correlated with poor overall survival (OS) (Figure and poor disease-free survival (RFS) (Figure of COADpatients, suggesting that EDB-FN overexpression could be a prognostic indicator for COAD.
Discussion
This work demonstrates that invasive drug-resistant CRC tumors overexpress the ECM oncoprotein EDB-FN, compared to their non-resistant counterparts. Drug-resistant CRC tumors that show negative response to targeted therapy also upregulate EDB-FN. These therapeutic pressure-induced alterations in EDB-FN levels enable effective non-invasive assessment and treatment response monitoring of drug-resistant CRC by MRMI, even at subclinical doses of MT218.The molecularly diverse landscape of CRC underscores the need for robust oncomarkers that can provide diagnostic, prognostic, or therapy-predictive value 59. Here, we showed, for the first time, that overexpression of EDB-FN correlated negatively with CRC patient survival. A prior study that showed poor prognosis of post-operative CRC patients with high oncFN1 levels used FDC-6 antibody, which binds to an alternative oncofetal isoform of fibronectin 60. Immunohistochemical analysis of patient samples showed strong EDB-FN-specific staining with G4 antibody in the primary and metastatic CRC sites. EDB-FN was found to be localized in the stroma, stromal fibroblasts, adenocarcinoma cells, and fibroblasts interspersed around these tumor cells. These results validate the recently emerging consensus that multiple cell types in the tumor milieu express EDB-FN 42, 43, suggesting multifaceted interactions of the cellular and extracellular components of the tumor microenvironment. The profound tumor-specific expression of EDB-FN was evident from the complete absence of G4 staining in the normal adjacent colon and liver tissues, signifying EDB-FN as an attractive candidate marker for CRC. The detection of over 300% increase in EDB-FN levels in the urinary samples of muscle-invasive bladder cancerpatients, and a negative correlation to their clinical outcomes 41, also validates its potential as a promising diagnostic oncomarker for other cancers.Both the 2D and 3D cell cultures demonstrated a positive association between the invasiveness of drug-resistant CRC cells and their endogenous EDB-FN expression. Between the two non-drug-resistant models, the DLD-1 cells exhibited higher expression of EDB-FN than the RKO cells. This is consistent with the inherent biological properties of the models, wherein the DLD-1 cells derived from Duke's type C, p53-mutated, CEA-expressing adenocarcinoma are more invasive and migratory than the RKO cells derived from a p53-, K-Ras-wild type primary carcinoma site 61, 62. Development of resistance to 5ʹ-FU by DLD-1 and 5ʹ-FU + CB-839 by RKO cells resulted in dynamically altered EMT-like DLD1-DR and hybrid E-M RKO-DR cells, highlighting the distinct trajectories taken by the two cell lines following therapeutic pressure-induced clonal selection 22. Both the drug-refractory cell lines also exhibited robust overexpression of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter MDR-1, which is unsurprising given that enhanced cellular efflux is a common mechanism of 5ʹ-FU-resistance 58. It is likely that the increased plasticity induced by the hybrid E-M phenotype confers CB-839 resistance on the RKO-DR cells 58. Enhanced plasticity and metabolic redundancy have been previously observed in CB-839-resistant breast cancer 63, 64, although the precise mechanisms of glutaminase inhibition resistance in CRC remain understudied.Irrespective of the heterogeneous molecular changes and EMT status, acquisition of invasive and migratory properties by both the drug-resistant CRC cell lines was associated with significant upregulation of EDB-FN. This upregulation was recapitulated in the drug-resistant DLD1-DR and RKO-DR xenografts, which exhibited robust signal enhancement and significantly higher CNRs in MRMI with EDB-FN-targeting contrast agent MT218, over their respective non-resistant counterparts, suggesting the potential of EDB-FN as a promising diagnostic oncomarker. We previously showed overexpression of EDB-FN in drug-resistant breast cancer cells 45. Three other groups also demonstrated elevated EDB-FN in CRC cells and tumors 42, 43, 65. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating EDB-FN overexpression in drug-refractory CRC. These elevated EDB-FN levels could be leveraged for ZD2-targeted MRMI-mediated non-invasive surveillance of tumor progression, to identify critical events and stages that precede the development of drug resistance.Drug resistance is the bane of oncotherapy and cancer radiology. A common strategy for treating disease relapse in patients involves adaptive interventions with a different class of drugs to counteract the new driver mutation profiles, which can vary between patients 66. Accurate non-invasive assessment of these drug-resistant cells and tumor response to oncotherapy (early within few days of treatment) has the potential to revolutionize the contemporary cancer treatment paradigm. Multiple lines of clinical evidence now indicate that assessment of therapeutic response cannot be based on the change of tumor size alone 26, 67. Consequently, we hypothesized that molecular imaging of abundantly overexpressed EDB-FN in correlation with the aggressive nature of the disease and independent of tumor size can potentially provide accurate tumor response to therapies. In our treatment regimen, the failure of the highly drug-resistant DLD1-DR tumors to MK2206-HCl therapy was reflected in their increased EDB-FN levels, and a consequent increase in MT218 uptake, demonstrated by robust signal enhancement and increased CNRs in MRMI. These tumors also increased in size, as did the vehicle tumors; however, the latter did not show comparable increase in EDB-FN and MT218 uptake as the treated tumors, suggesting that the MRMI was based on inherent EDB-FN expression and not anatomical tumor size. While the negative response to MK2206-HCl was unexpected considering our previous findings on the role of phospho-AKT signaling in EDB-FN regulation 45 in breast cancer cells, we speculate that the enhanced plasticity and overexpression of the drug efflux pump MDR-1 could have rendered the DLD1-DR tumors non-responsive to MK2206-HCl. A compensatory activation of alternative AKT-independent oncogenic signaling (e.g., NF-κβ) in 5ʹ-FU-treated DLD-1 cells has also been shown before 68. The treatment was terminated at week 4 due to the large tumor burden, precluding any other adaptive interventions or imaging tests. Although this research was limited to the imaging of primary tumors, the promising results warrant further investigation in to analyzing additional parameters and imaging modalities in conjunction with monitoring tumor volumes to validate and correlate the tumor responses to various therapies.Only two previous reports on EDB-FN-based radioimmunotherapy in CRC using 125I-labeled L19-SIP antibody exist, which demonstrated selective tumor uptake and tumor growth inhibition in CRC xenografts 65 and CRC patients 42; however, EDB-FN-based MRMI assessment of drug-resistant CRC has never been performed before. Our preliminary data serve as a groundwork for transforming EDB-FN-targeted molecular imaging, alone and as an adjunct to other screening modalities, into a clinically viable technology for CRC management. One of the challenges of MRI in CRC imaging is accurate detection of hepatic CRC metastases, a major prognostic indicator of patient outcomes 8. Given that we and independent researchers 42 observed elevated EDB-FN expression in patient metastatic liver specimens, accurate and timely detection of these evasive niches could provide a crucial diagnostic advantage during treatment regimens. Although MRI is the primary modality of choice for staging rectal cancer, it's performance for tumor restaging following oncotherapy is inconsistent 6. Therefore, it would be interesting to evaluate the efficacy of MRMI with MT218 in determining the response of patients to neoadjuvant therapy during the “wait and watch” period, before planning surgical interventions.Although contrast-enhanced MRI remains crucial for diagnosis, cumulative exposure to contrast media, especially linear GBCAs, results in deposition and long-term accumulation of Gd in the brain, bones, and even skin of patients 20, 69, 70. MT218 is a small peptide conjugate of a clinical macrocyclic contrast agent Gadoteridol with high stability and good safety profile. We recently demonstrated strong tumor-specific enhancement in MRMI with MT218 at a reduced dose of 40 µmol/kg in comparison to the standard clinical dose of 0.1 mmol/kg in breast cancer models 53. The uncompromised efficacy of MRMI with MT218 at the reduced dose can minimize the potential risk of Gd-associated and dose-dependent toxicity. This low dose was also sufficient to enable effective assessment of CRC and drug-resistant CRC tumors in this study. By virtue of the high T1 relaxivity (6.13 mM-1s-1 at 3T) of MT218, effective MRMI at subclinical doses, and easy accessibility of abundant EDB-FN in the tumor microenvironment to MT218 binding, we posit that MRMI with reduced Gd exposure is promising for active surveillance and treatment monitoring of CRC. Given that tumor cell plasticity engenders extensive patient-to-patient variability in tumor progression and therapeutic response, even within the same cancer type 22, MRMI with MT218 based on the tumor levels of EDB-FN could detect the development of drug resistance early during the chemotherapeutic period and also to adaptive therapies, helping to tailor treatment regimen for the relevant patients and improving the success of oncotherapy.The unique advantages of EDB-FN-specific ZD2 peptide can also be harnessed to develop integrated imaging systems like PET/MRI or PET/CT for multi-parametric molecular imaging. Indeed, PET and SPECT probes have already been generated by conjugating the EDB-FN-specific ZD2 peptide to radiotracers like 64Cu-DOTA, 68Ga-NOTA, and 99mTc-HYNIC chelates for improved detection of prostate, pancreatic, and breast cancers 48, 71, 72, respectively. These systems could also provide insight into several aspects of CRC, including metastatic surveillance following primary tumor resection, imaging of CRC in syngeneic models treated with chemotherapy, and assessment of tumor response to immunotherapy. Besides ZD2, other EDB-FN-targeting ligands, antibodies and nanobodies, including APT-FN-EDB, L19, BC1, and NJB2 have also been used to deliver therapeutic and imaging agents to tumor ECM and vasculature 46, 73-75, validating the role of EDB-FN as a promising oncomarker.In summary, we demonstrate tumor-specific EDB-FN expression in COAD specimens, and poor prognosis of COADpatients with high levels of EDB-FN. While CRC cells and tumor xenografts inherently express EDB-FN, its expression is further elevated in their drug-resistant counterparts. MRMI of EDB-FN with a significantly reduced dose of MT218 can facilitate effective non-invasive assessment and therapeutic monitoring of drug-resistant CRC, highlighting the translational potential of MT218-mediated EDB-FN-targeting MRMI in active surveillance and monitoring of drug-resistant neoplasms.Supplementary figures.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Roberto García-Figueiras; Sandra Baleato-González; Anwar R Padhani; Antonio Luna-Alcalá; Ana Marhuenda; Joan C Vilanova; Iria Osorio-Vázquez; Anxo Martínez-de-Alegría; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño Journal: Radiographics Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Monica Santimaria; Giovanni Moscatelli; Giuseppe L Viale; Leonardo Giovannoni; Giovanni Neri; Francesca Viti; Alessandra Leprini; Laura Borsi; Patrizia Castellani; Luciano Zardi; Dario Neri; Pietro Riva Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Bernard M Tijink; Lars R Perk; Marianne Budde; Marijke Stigter-van Walsum; Gerard W M Visser; Reina W Kloet; Ludger M Dinkelborg; C René Leemans; Dario Neri; Guus A M S van Dongen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 9.236