Literature DB >> 33040327

Machine learning from wristband sensor data for wearable, noninvasive seizure forecasting.

Christian Meisel1,2,3, Rima El Atrache3, Michele Jackson3, Sarah Schubach3, Claire Ufongene3, Tobias Loddenkemper3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Seizure forecasting may provide patients with timely warnings to adapt their daily activities and help clinicians deliver more objective, personalized treatments. Although recent work has convincingly demonstrated that seizure risk assessment is in principle possible, these early approaches relied largely on complex, often invasive setups including intracranial electrocorticography, implanted devices, and multichannel electroencephalography, and required patient-specific adaptation or learning to perform optimally, all of which limit translation to broad clinical application. To facilitate broader adaptation of seizure forecasting in clinical practice, noninvasive, easily applicable techniques that reliably assess seizure risk without much prior tuning are crucial. Wristbands that continuously record physiological parameters, including electrodermal activity, body temperature, blood volume pulse, and actigraphy, may afford monitoring of autonomous nervous system function and movement relevant for such a task, hence minimizing potential complications associated with invasive monitoring and avoiding stigma associated with bulky external monitoring devices on the head.
METHODS: Here, we applied deep learning on multimodal wristband sensor data from 69 patients with epilepsy (total duration > 2311 hours, 452 seizures) to assess its capability to forecast seizures in a statistically significant way.
RESULTS: Using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation approach, we identified better-than-chance predictability in 43% of the patients. Time-matched seizure surrogate data analyses indicated forecasting not to be driven simply by time of day or vigilance state. Prediction performance peaked when all sensor modalities were used, and did not differ between generalized and focal seizure types, but generally increased with the size of the training dataset, indicating potential further improvement with larger datasets in the future. SIGNIFICANCE: Collectively, these results show that statistically significant seizure risk assessments are feasible from easy-to-use, noninvasive wearable devices without the need of patient-specific training or parameter optimization.
© 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  precision medicine; seizure forecasting; wearable devices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33040327     DOI: 10.1111/epi.16719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  11 in total

1.  Seizure forecasting using minimally invasive, ultra-long-term subcutaneous electroencephalography: Individualized intrapatient models.

Authors:  Pedro F Viana; Tal Pal Attia; Mona Nasseri; Jonas Duun-Henriksen; Andrea Biondi; Joel S Winston; Isabel Pavão Martins; Ewan S Nurse; Matthias Dümpelmann; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Troels W Kjaer; Mark P Richardson; Benjamin H Brinkmann
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.740

2.  Seizure forecasting using minimally invasive, ultra-long-term subcutaneous EEG: Generalizable cross-patient models.

Authors:  Tal Pal Attia; Pedro F Viana; Mona Nasseri; Jonas Duun-Henriksen; Andrea Biondi; Joel S Winston; Isabel P Martins; Ewan S Nurse; Matthias Dümpelmann; Gregory A Worrell; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Troels W Kjaer; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Mark P Richardson
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.740

3.  Ambulatory seizure forecasting with a wrist-worn device using long-short term memory deep learning.

Authors:  Mona Nasseri; Tal Pal Attia; Boney Joseph; Nicholas M Gregg; Ewan S Nurse; Pedro F Viana; Gregory Worrell; Matthias Dümpelmann; Mark P Richardson; Dean R Freestone; Benjamin H Brinkmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Machine Learning for Healthcare Wearable Devices: The Big Picture.

Authors:  Farida Sabry; Tamer Eltaras; Wadha Labda; Khawla Alzoubi; Qutaibah Malluhi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.822

5.  Seizure-related differences in biosignal 24-h modulation patterns.

Authors:  Solveig Vieluf; Rima El Atrache; Sarah Cantley; Michele Jackson; Justice Clark; Theodore Sheehan; William J Bosl; Bo Zhang; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  Afshin Shoeibi; Marjane Khodatars; Navid Ghassemi; Mahboobeh Jafari; Parisa Moridian; Roohallah Alizadehsani; Maryam Panahiazar; Fahime Khozeimeh; Assef Zare; Hossein Hosseini-Nejad; Abbas Khosravi; Amir F Atiya; Diba Aminshahidi; Sadiq Hussain; Modjtaba Rouhani; Saeid Nahavandi; Udyavara Rajendra Acharya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Seizure Diaries and Forecasting With Wearables: Epilepsy Monitoring Outside the Clinic.

Authors:  Benjamin H Brinkmann; Philippa J Karoly; Ewan S Nurse; Sonya B Dumanis; Mona Nasseri; Pedro F Viana; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Greg Worrell; Mark P Richardson; Mark J Cook
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Forecasting Seizure Likelihood With Wearable Technology.

Authors:  Rachel E Stirling; David B Grayden; Wendyl D'Souza; Mark J Cook; Ewan Nurse; Dean R Freestone; Daniel E Payne; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Tal Pal Attia; Pedro F Viana; Mark P Richardson; Philippa J Karoly
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Power efficient refined seizure prediction algorithm based on an enhanced benchmarking.

Authors:  Ziyu Wang; Jie Yang; Hemmings Wu; Junming Zhu; Mohamad Sawan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  [Use of machine learning for the prediction of stress using the example of logistics].

Authors:  Hermann Foot; Benedikt Mättig; Michael Fiolka; Tim Grylewicz; Michael Ten Hompel; Veronika Kretschmer
Journal:  Z Arbeitswiss       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.