Literature DB >> 33040174

Penile girth augmentation by injectable fillers: a comprehensive review of imaging features and inflammatory complications.

Sherif A Abo-Hedibah1,2, Amr N Badawi2,3, Sameh A Aly4,5, Sherif R M Ismail6, Ali H Elmokadem7,8.   

Abstract

Despite the extensive controversy and debate of penile girth augmentation, high demands for such procedures are increasing. Penile inflammation is not common sequel after penile filler augmentation, but when it occurs, it has serious complications that sometimes necessitate emergency surgical intervention. Imaging with a variety of modalities, including ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ascending urethrogrphy plays a paramount role in the detection and assessment of these conditions. Inflammatory conditions after penile girth augmentation using injectable fillers are ranging from local granuloma to penile abscess formation or diffuse cellulitis that may extend to the scrotum, perineum or deep pelvic organs. Rapid diagnosis and evaluation of extensions are important to avoid associated morbidity and permanent deformity. Our purpose is to provide a practical review of relevant penile anatomy, imaging appearance and injection technique of different types of subcutaneous fillers used in penile girth augmentation, and inflammatory complications that may occur after these procedures. Brief descriptions of patient clinical information and imaging features of inflammatory complications will be included and correlated in actual cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Penis; augmentation; fillers; inflammation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33040174     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02788-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  57 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the penis.

Authors:  A Vossough; E S Pretorius; E S Siegelman; P Ramchandani; M P Banner
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Colour Doppler ultrasound of the penis.

Authors:  C J Wilkins; S Sriprasad; P S Sidhu
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  MR imaging of the penis.

Authors:  E S Pretorius; E S Siegelman; P Ramchandani; M P Banner
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Contribution to the study of the venous vasculature of the penis.

Authors:  J Moscovici; P Galinier; S Hammoudi; D Lefebvre; M Juricic; P Vaysse
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  Penile Girth Enlargement Strategies: What's the Evidence?

Authors:  Marah C Hehemann; Maxwell Towe; Linda My Huynh; Farouk M El-Khatib; Faysal A Yafi
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2019-01-04

6.  Imaging of penile and scrotal emergencies.

Authors:  Laura L Avery; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Comparing penile measurements in normal and erectile dysfunction subjects.

Authors:  Ihab Kamel; Amr Gadalla; Hussein Ghanem; Mohamed Oraby
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Ultrasound evaluation of the penis.

Authors:  Maitê Aline Vieira Fernandes; Luis Ronan Marquez Ferreira de Souza; Luciano Pousa Cartafina
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Penile Doppler ultrasonography revisited.

Authors:  Dae Chul Jung; Sung Yoon Park; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-06-10

10.  The use of an acellular collagen matrix in penile augmentation: A pilot study in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Alaa A Tealab; Aref M Maarouf; Mohamed Habous; David J Ralph; Safwat Abohashem
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-03-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Penile Girth Injection Complications: A Case Report.

Authors:  Alden Baird Bryce; Nick Robertson; A Broderick Gregory
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.491

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.