Literature DB >> 19453888

Comparing penile measurements in normal and erectile dysfunction subjects.

Ihab Kamel1, Amr Gadalla, Hussein Ghanem, Mohamed Oraby.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the increase in penile augmentation procedures it becomes important to assess what is the normal erect penile size in both potent men and men with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: The aim of this work is to define the average stretched penile size in normal men and ED patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Penile length and girth.
METHODS: This study included 1,027 adult men presenting to a university hospital outpatient clinic. Two groups of patients were included in this research work. Group I comprises normal adult men (949) and Group II, ED patients (78). There were no differences of race, age, height, and weight. Penile length and girth were measured using a tape measure and rigid ruler in the fully stretched states in both groups. All penile measurements were performed by the same physician.
RESULTS: In normal men (Group I) the mean of the fully stretched length was 12.9 +/- 1.9 cm and the mean of the fully stretched girth was 8.9 +/- 0.9 cm. In ED patients (Group II), the mean of the fully stretched length was 11.2 +/- 1.5 cm and the mean of fully stretched girth was 8.8 +/- 0.8 cm. Comparing the mean of fully stretched penile lengths in both groups revealed statistical significant difference (P < 0.001) between them, whereas comparing the mean of fully stretched penile girths in both groups revealed statistical nonsignificant difference (P = 0.474) between them. There were significant positive correlations between fully stretched penile lengths and fully stretched penile girths in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The average of fully stretched penile length in normal potent men is 12.9 cm, whereas the patients with ED tend to have significantly shorter penises (11.2 +/- 1.5 cm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453888     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

1.  Penile Dimensions of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Nader Salama
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 2.  Therapeutic strategies for patients with micropenis or penile dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Majid Shabbir; David Ralph; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Penile girth augmentation by injectable fillers: a comprehensive review of imaging features and inflammatory complications.

Authors:  Sherif A Abo-Hedibah; Amr N Badawi; Sameh A Aly; Sherif R M Ismail; Ali H Elmokadem
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-10

Review 4.  History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Zaccaro; David Subirà; Iñigo López-Diez; Celeste Manfredi; Julmar Paul Ascensios-Vargas; Ignacio Moncada-Iribarren
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Aesthetic surgery of the male genitalia.

Authors:  Gary J Alter; Christopher J Salgado; Harvey Chim
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases.

Authors:  Alessandro Littara; Roberto Melone; Julio Cesar Morales-Medina; Tommaso Iannitti; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Desire for penile girth enhancement and the effects of the self-injection of hyaluronic Acid gel.

Authors:  Enis Rauf Coskuner; Halil Ibrahim Canter
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 8.  Erectile dysfunction in Arab countries. Part II: Diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed I El-Sakka
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.