Heather D'Angelo1, Minal Patel2, Shyanika W Rose3. 1. School of Medicine and Public Health, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: heather.d'angelo@nih.gov. 2. Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. College of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science, and Center for Health Equity Transformation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The association between e-cigarette marketing exposure and youth e-cigarette initiation is not well understood. This study examines whether convenience store access, exposure to retail e-cigarette marketing, and having a favorite e-cigarette ad before e-cigarette use is associated with susceptibility to use and future e-cigarette initiation in a national longitudinal study of youth. METHODS: A nationally representative longitudinal cohort of youth in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (12-17 years) was followed up over three waves of annual data collection (2013-2016). Tobacco-naïve (wave 1) and e-cigarette-naïve (wave 2) youth (n = 6,470) were included. Marketing exposure at wave 2 was examined in association with e-cigarette susceptibility (wave 2) and e-cigarette initiation (wave 3) using adjusted logistic regression models. Analysis occurred in 2019. RESULTS: Youth visiting convenience stores at least weekly (vs. never) had 1.51 times the odds of e-cigarette susceptibility (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25, 1.81) and 1.79 times the odds of e-cigarette initiation (95% CI: 1.29, 2.48). Noticing a retail e-cigarette ad (vs. not noticing) was associated with e-cigarette susceptibility (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.57), but not initiation. Youth reporting a favorite branded e-cigarette ad had greater odds of both susceptibility (AOR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.10, 1.56) and e-cigarette initiation (AOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.17) compared to youth without a favorite ad. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco-naïve youth with frequent convenience store access and exposure to e-cigarette marketing were at greater risk of e-cigarette susceptibility and progression to e-cigarette initiation over a 2-year period. Policies to restrict retailer locations and e-cigarette marketing could enhance youth e-cigarette use prevention efforts. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: The association between e-cigarette marketing exposure and youth e-cigarette initiation is not well understood. This study examines whether convenience store access, exposure to retail e-cigarette marketing, and having a favorite e-cigarette ad before e-cigarette use is associated with susceptibility to use and future e-cigarette initiation in a national longitudinal study of youth. METHODS: A nationally representative longitudinal cohort of youth in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (12-17 years) was followed up over three waves of annual data collection (2013-2016). Tobacco-naïve (wave 1) and e-cigarette-naïve (wave 2) youth (n = 6,470) were included. Marketing exposure at wave 2 was examined in association with e-cigarette susceptibility (wave 2) and e-cigarette initiation (wave 3) using adjusted logistic regression models. Analysis occurred in 2019. RESULTS: Youth visiting convenience stores at least weekly (vs. never) had 1.51 times the odds of e-cigarette susceptibility (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25, 1.81) and 1.79 times the odds of e-cigarette initiation (95% CI: 1.29, 2.48). Noticing a retail e-cigarette ad (vs. not noticing) was associated with e-cigarette susceptibility (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.57), but not initiation. Youth reporting a favorite branded e-cigarette ad had greater odds of both susceptibility (AOR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.10, 1.56) and e-cigarette initiation (AOR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.17) compared to youth without a favorite ad. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco-naïve youth with frequent convenience store access and exposure to e-cigarette marketing were at greater risk of e-cigarette susceptibility and progression to e-cigarette initiation over a 2-year period. Policies to restrict retailer locations and e-cigarette marketing could enhance youth e-cigarette use prevention efforts. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Daniel P Giovenco; David Hammond; Catherine G Corey; Bridget K Ambrose; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kevin P Conway; Victoria R Green; Karin A Kasza; Marushka L Silveira; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; James D Sargent; Cassandra A Stanton; Elizabeth Lambert; Nahla Hilmi; Chad J Reissig; Kia J Jackson; Susanne E Tanski; David Maklan; Andrew J Hyland; Wilson M Compton Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Roee L Astor; Robert Urman; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jane Steinberg; Michael Cousineau; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Cruz; Mary Ann Pentz; Jonathan M Samet; Rob McConnell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kristy L Marynak; Doris G Gammon; Todd Rogers; Ellen M Coats; Tushar Singh; Brian A King Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel P Giovenco; Myriam Casseus; Dustin T Duncan; Elliot J Coups; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Nina M Parikh; Nina C Schleicher; Stephen P Fortmann; Lisa Henriksen Journal: Health Place Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Elizabeth Lambert; Charles Carusi; Kristie Taylor; Scott Crosse; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; David Abrams; John P Pierce; James Sargent; Karen Messer; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Ray Niaura; Donna Vallone; David Hammond; Nahla Hilmi; Jonathan Kwan; Andrea Piesse; Graham Kalton; Sharon Lohr; Nick Pharris-Ciurej; Victoria Castleman; Victoria R Green; Greta Tessman; Annette Kaufman; Charles Lawrence; Dana M van Bemmel; Heather L Kimmel; Ben Blount; Ling Yang; Barbara O'Brien; Cindy Tworek; Derek Alberding; Lynn C Hull; Yu-Ching Cheng; David Maklan; Cathy L Backinger; Wilson M Compton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Sara Schiff; Fei Liu; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger; Sam Cwalina; Adam Leventhal; Rob McConnell; Jessica Barrington-Trimis Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Victor Martinez-Loredo; Alba González-Roz; Lynne Dawkins; Desmond Singh; James G Murphy; James MacKillop Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Yu Wang; Zongshuan Duan; Scott R Weaver; Shannon R Self-Brown; David L Ashley; Sherry L Emery; Jidong Huang Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-09-01
Authors: Vuong V Do; Amy L Nyman; Yoonsang Kim; Sherry L Emery; Scott R Weaver; Jidong Huang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Julia C Chen-Sankey; Judy van de Venne; Susan Westneat; Basmah Rahman; Shanell Folger; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Charles Debnam; Kurt M Ribisl; Amy Cohn; Shyanika W Rose Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2022-06-29