Literature DB >> 32108084

E-cigarette and cigarette purchasing among young adults before and after implementation of California's tobacco 21 policy.

Sara Schiff1, Fei Liu1, Tess Boley Cruz1,2,3, Jennifer B Unger1,2,3, Sam Cwalina1, Adam Leventhal1,2,3, Rob McConnell1,2,3, Jessica Barrington-Trimis4,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco 21 (T21) laws, which raise the minimum legal age of sale of tobacco products to 21, have been proposed and implemented in states and cities across the USA. However, limited data are available on the effect of T21 laws on youth tobacco purchasing behaviours and access to tobacco products.
METHODS: Participants in a population-based prospective cohort in southern California completed questionnaires before (n=1609, age=18-19 y) and after (n=1502, age=19-20 y) T21 was implemented in California (June 2016). We examined the prevalence of past 30-day cigarette and e-cigarette use, and among past 30-day users, purchase location of tobacco products before (pre-) versus after (post-) T21. We also examined whether, post-T21, participants were refused purchase of tobacco products due to their age, and the perceived relative ease of purchasing cigarettes and e-cigarettes (vs pre-T21).
RESULTS: Negligible changes in cigarette and e-cigarette use were observed pre-T21 versus post-T21. At both time points, the majority of past 30-day users purchased cigarettes from gas stations and e-cigarettes from vape shops. Post-T21, the proportion of participants who reported purchasing cigarettes at gas stations decreased. Post-T21, most past 30-day cigarette or e-cigarette users were not refused purchase of cigarettes (65.4%) or e-cigarettes (82.0%) in the past 30 days, despite being under 21; half of the participants felt it was harder to purchase cigarettes (54.3%) and e-cigarettes (43.6%) post-T21.
CONCLUSION: Post-T21, few participants were refused purchase of any tobacco product, despite the illegality of such sales. Better enforcement of T21 is needed to improve the efficacy of T21 legislation. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  addiction; electronic nicotine delivery devices; public policy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108084      PMCID: PMC8260105          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  18 in total

1.  Examining quit attempts and successful quitting after recent cigarette tax increases.

Authors:  Raymond G Boyle; Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Zhiqun Tang
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Assessment of Underage Sales Violations in Tobacco Stores and Vape Shops.

Authors:  April Roeseler; Tam D Vuong; Lisa Henriksen; Xueying Zhang
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Cigarette tax rates, behavioral disengagement, and quit ratios among daily smokers.

Authors:  Rebecca Ferrer; Edward Orehek; Michael F Scheier; Mary E O'Connell
Journal:  J Econ Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

4.  Tobacco Retail Licensing and Youth Product Use.

Authors:  Roee L Astor; Robert Urman; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jane Steinberg; Michael Cousineau; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Cruz; Mary Ann Pentz; Jonathan M Samet; Rob McConnell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Impact of New York City's 2014 Increased Minimum Legal Purchase Age on Youth Tobacco Use.

Authors:  James Macinko; Diana Silver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Retailers' Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation Authority.

Authors:  Kacie C A Blackman; Sabrina L Smiley; Natalie M Kintz; Yaneth L Rodriguez; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Chih-Ping Chou; Tess Boley Cruz; Rosa Barahona; Mary Ann Pentz; Jonathan M Samet; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2019-05-01

7.  False identification use among college students increases the risk for alcohol use disorder: results of a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Brittany A Bugbee; Kevin E O'Grady
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Retailer compliance with tobacco control laws in New York City before and after raising the minimum legal purchase age to 21.

Authors:  Diana Silver; James Macinko; Margaret Giorgio; Jin Yung Bae; Geronimo Jimenez
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Traffic, susceptibility, and childhood asthma.

Authors:  Rob McConnell; Kiros Berhane; Ling Yao; Michael Jerrett; Fred Lurmann; Frank Gilliland; Nino Künzli; Jim Gauderman; Ed Avol; Duncan Thomas; John Peters
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Vital Signs: Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2011-2018.

Authors:  Andrea S Gentzke; MeLisa Creamer; Karen A Cullen; Bridget K Ambrose; Gordon Willis; Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  6 in total

1.  Underage sales signage in vape shops: Comparison of stores near and far from California colleges.

Authors:  Amna Ali; Dianne C Barker; Monika Vishwakarma; Nina C Schleicher; Trent O Johnson; Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  A Rapid Evaluation of the US Federal Tobacco 21 (T21) Law and Lessons From Statewide T21 Policies: Findings From Population-Level Surveys.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Lungile Nkosi; Queen D Agaku; Joy Gwar; Tina Tsafa
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Youth and Young Adult Convenience Store Behaviors: Findings From Intercept Surveys.

Authors:  Jessica L King; Kimberly G Wagoner; Beth A Reboussin; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Convenience Store Access and E-cigarette Advertising Exposure Is Associated With Future E-cigarette Initiation Among Tobacco-Naïve Youth in the PATH Study (2013-2016).

Authors:  Heather D'Angelo; Minal Patel; Shyanika W Rose
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Electronic cigarette knowledge, attitudes and use among students at a university in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Juan Fang; Jianping Ren; Lixian Ren; Wendy Max; Tingting Yao; Falin Zhao
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.600

6.  Tobacco 21 laws may reduce smoking and tobacco-related health disparities among youth in the U.S.

Authors:  David C Colston; Yanmei Xie; Megan E Patrick; James F Thrasher; Andrea R Titus; Michael R Elliott; David T Levy; Nancy L Fleischer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-03-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.