Literature DB >> 33039248

Anticipating and Identifying Collateral Damage in Genome Editing.

Gaëtan Burgio1, Lydia Teboul2.   

Abstract

Genome editing has powerful applications in research, healthcare, and agriculture. However, the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus. This has considerable impact in providing a safe approach for therapeutic genome editing, agriculture, and other applications. This opinion article discusses how to anticipate and detect those editing events by a combination of assays to capture all possible genomic changes. It also discusses strategies for preventing unwanted effects, critical to appraise the benefit or risk associated with the use of the technology. Anticipating and verifying the result of genome editing are essential for the success for all applications.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  ectopic insertions; genome editing; off-target activity; on-target activity; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33039248      PMCID: PMC7658041          DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  7 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  DGK and DZHK position paper on genome editing: basic science applications and future perspective.

Authors:  Ralf P Brandes; Anne Dueck; Stefan Engelhardt; Manuel Kaulich; Christian Kupatt; Maria Teresa De Angelis; Matthias S Leisegang; Ferdinand le Noble; Alessandra Moretti; Oliver J Müller; Boris V Skryabin; Thomas Thum; Wolfgang Wurst
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Multiplex Gene Tagging with CRISPR-Cas9 for Live-Cell Microscopy and Application to Study the Role of SARS-CoV-2 Proteins in Autophagy, Mitochondrial Dynamics, and Cell Growth.

Authors:  Oscar Perez-Leal; Jonathon Nixon-Abell; Carlos A Barrero; John C Gordon; James Oesterling; Mario C Rico
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 4.  Importing genetically altered animals: ensuring quality.

Authors:  M-C Birling; M D Fray; P Kasparek; J Kopkanova; M Massimi; R Matteoni; L Montoliu; L M J Nutter; M Raspa; J Rozman; E J Ryder; F Scavizzi; V Voikar; S Wells; G Pavlovic; L Teboul
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.

Authors:  Si-Cheng Liu; Yi-Li Feng; Xiu-Na Sun; Ruo-Dan Chen; Qian Liu; Jing-Jing Xiao; Jin-Na Zhang; Zhi-Cheng Huang; Ji-Feng Xiang; Guo-Qiao Chen; Yi Yang; Chao Lou; Hao-Dan Li; Zhen Cai; Shi-Ming Xu; Hui Lin; An-Yong Xie
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 17.906

6.  DAJIN enables multiplex genotyping to simultaneously validate intended and unintended target genome editing outcomes.

Authors:  Akihiro Kuno; Yoshihisa Ikeda; Shinya Ayabe; Kanako Kato; Kotaro Sakamoto; Sayaka R Suzuki; Kento Morimoto; Arata Wakimoto; Natsuki Mikami; Miyuki Ishida; Natsumi Iki; Yuko Hamada; Megumi Takemura; Yoko Daitoku; Yoko Tanimoto; Tra Thi Huong Dinh; Kazuya Murata; Michito Hamada; Masafumi Muratani; Atsushi Yoshiki; Fumihiro Sugiyama; Satoru Takahashi; Seiya Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency.

Authors:  James W Nelson; Peyton B Randolph; Simon P Shen; Kelcee A Everette; Peter J Chen; Andrew V Anzalone; Meirui An; Gregory A Newby; Jonathan C Chen; Alvin Hsu; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 68.164

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.