Literature DB >> 33037897

Maximizing efficiency of genomic selection in CIMMYT's tropical maize breeding program.

Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda1,2,3, Michael Olsen4, Juan Burgueño2, Jose Crossa2, Daniel Dzidzienyo1, Yoseph Beyene5, Manje Gowda5, Kate Dreher2, Xuecai Zhang2, Boddupalli M Prasanna5, Pangirayi Tongoona1, Eric Yirenkyi Danquah1, Gbadebo Olaoye6, Kelly R Robbins7.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Historical data from breeding programs can be efficiently used to improve genomic selection accuracy, especially when the training set is optimized to subset individuals most informative of the target testing set. The current strategy for large-scale implementation of genomic selection (GS) at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) global maize breeding program has been to train models using information from full-sibs in a "test-half-predict-half approach." Although effective, this approach has limitations, as it requires large full-sib populations and limits the ability to shorten variety testing and breeding cycle times. The primary objective of this study was to identify optimal experimental and training set designs to maximize prediction accuracy of GS in CIMMYT's maize breeding programs. Training set (TS) design strategies were evaluated to determine the most efficient use of phenotypic data collected on relatives for genomic prediction (GP) using datasets containing 849 (DS1) and 1389 (DS2) DH-lines evaluated as testcrosses in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our results show there is merit in the use of multiple bi-parental populations as TS when selected using algorithms to maximize relatedness between the training and prediction sets. In a breeding program where relevant past breeding information is not readily available, the phenotyping expenditure can be spread across connected bi-parental populations by phenotyping only a small number of lines from each population. This significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to within-population prediction, especially when the TS for within full-sib prediction is small. Finally, we demonstrate that prediction accuracy in either sparse testing or "test-half-predict-half" can further be improved by optimizing which lines are planted for phenotyping and which lines are to be only genotyped for advancement based on GP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33037897      PMCID: PMC7813723          DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03696-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  7 in total

Review 1.  Body weight, fat storage, and alcohol metabolism.

Authors:  J P Flatt
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in selected breeding populations: A segregation distortion approach.

Authors:  Y Cui; F Zhang; J Xu; Z Li; S Xu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Use of Genomic Estimated Breeding Values Results in Rapid Genetic Gains for Drought Tolerance in Maize.

Authors:  B S Vivek; Girish Kumar Krishna; V Vengadessan; R Babu; P H Zaidi; Le Quy Kha; S S Mandal; P Grudloyma; S Takalkar; K Krothapalli; I S Singh; Eureka Teresa M Ocampo; F Xingming; J Burgueño; M Azrai; R P Singh; J Crossa
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.

Authors:  M Khansefid; J E Pryce; S Bolormaa; S P Miller; Z Wang; C Li; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Enhancing the rate of genetic gain in public-sector plant breeding programs: lessons from the breeder's equation.

Authors:  Joshua N Cobb; Roselyne U Juma; Partha S Biswas; Juan D Arbelaez; Jessica Rutkoski; Gary Atlin; Tom Hagen; Michael Quinn; Eng Hwa Ng
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genomic prediction in early selection stages using multi-year data in a hybrid rye breeding program.

Authors:  Angela-Maria Bernal-Vasquez; Andres Gordillo; Malthe Schmidt; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Strategies for Effective Use of Genomic Information in Crop Breeding Programs Serving Africa and South Asia.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda; Yoseph Beyene; Rajeev K Varshney; Michael Olsen; Elizabeth Jones; Manish Roorkiwal; Manje Gowda; Chellapilla Bharadwaj; Pooran M Gaur; Xuecai Zhang; Kate Dreher; Claudio Ayala-Hernández; Jose Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Abhishek Rathore; Star Yanxin Gao; Susan McCouch; Kelly R Robbins
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Sparse testing using genomic prediction improves selection for breeding targets in elite spring wheat.

Authors:  Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda; Velu Govindan; Ravi Singh; Kelly R Robbins; Jose Crossa; Alison R Bentley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.574

5.  Optimizing Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Small-Scale Maize Hybrid Breeding Programs: A Roadmap Review.

Authors:  Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Giovanni Galli; Karina Lima Reis Borges; Germano Costa-Neto; Filipe Couto Alves; Felipe Sabadin; Danilo Hottis Lyra; Pedro Patric Pinho Morais; Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade; Italo Granato; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genomic Prediction of Resistance to Tar Spot Complex of Maize in Multiple Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing SNPs.

Authors:  Shiliang Cao; Junqiao Song; Yibing Yuan; Ao Zhang; Jiaojiao Ren; Yubo Liu; Jingtao Qu; Guanghui Hu; Jianguo Zhang; Chunping Wang; Jingsheng Cao; Michael Olsen; Boddupalli M Prasanna; Felix San Vicente; Xuecai Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Genetic, Epigenetic, Genomic and Microbial Approaches to Enhance Salt Tolerance of Plants: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Gargi Prasad Saradadevi; Debajit Das; Satendra K Mangrauthia; Sridev Mohapatra; Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah; Manish Roorkiwal; Manish Solanki; Raman Meenakshi Sundaram; Neeraja N Chirravuri; Akshay S Sakhare; Suneetha Kota; Rajeev K Varshney; Gireesha Mohannath
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Multi-generation genomic prediction of maize yield using parametric and non-parametric sparse selection indices.

Authors:  Marco Lopez-Cruz; Yoseph Beyene; Manje Gowda; Jose Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 3.821

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.