Amber D Zegers1, Pieter Coenen1, Mirjam van Belzen2, Vivian Engelen2, Carol Richel3, Desiree J S Dona4, Allard J van der Beek1, Saskia F A Duijts1,5. 1. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Dutch Federation of Cancer Patients Organizations (Nederlandse Federatie van Kankerpatiëntenorganisaties, NFK), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Dutch Breast Cancer Organization (Borstkankervereniging Nederland, BVN), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Human Resources, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland, IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Early access to work-related psychosocial cancer care can contribute to return to work of cancer survivors. We aimed to explore: (a) the extent to which hospital healthcare professionals conduct conversations about work-related issues with cancer survivors, (b) whether cancer survivors experience these conversations as helpful, and (c) the possible financial implications for cancer survivors of (not) discussing their work early on. METHODS: The Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations developed and conducted a cross-sectional online survey, consisting of 27 items, among cancer survivors in the Netherlands. RESULTS: In total, 3500 survivors participated in this study (71% female; mean age (SD) 56 (11) years). Thirty-two percent reported to have had a conversation about work-related issues with a healthcare professional in the hospital. Fifty-four percent indicated that this conversation had been helpful to them. Conversations about work-related issues took place more frequently with male cancer survivors, those aged 55 years or below, those diagnosed with gynecological, prostate, breast, and hematological or lymphatic cancer, those diagnosed ≤2 years ago, or those who received their last treatment ≤2 years ago. There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of conversations about work-related issues and experiencing the financial consequences of cancer and/or its treatment as burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: Although conversations about work-related issues are generally experienced as helpful by cancer survivors, early access to work-related psychosocial cancer care in the hospital setting is not yet systematically offered.
OBJECTIVE: Early access to work-related psychosocial cancer care can contribute to return to work of cancer survivors. We aimed to explore: (a) the extent to which hospital healthcare professionals conduct conversations about work-related issues with cancer survivors, (b) whether cancer survivors experience these conversations as helpful, and (c) the possible financial implications for cancer survivors of (not) discussing their work early on. METHODS: The Dutch Federation of CancerPatient Organizations developed and conducted a cross-sectional online survey, consisting of 27 items, among cancer survivors in the Netherlands. RESULTS: In total, 3500 survivors participated in this study (71% female; mean age (SD) 56 (11) years). Thirty-two percent reported to have had a conversation about work-related issues with a healthcare professional in the hospital. Fifty-four percent indicated that this conversation had been helpful to them. Conversations about work-related issues took place more frequently with male cancer survivors, those aged 55 years or below, those diagnosed with gynecological, prostate, breast, and hematological or lymphatic cancer, those diagnosed ≤2 years ago, or those who received their last treatment ≤2 years ago. There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of conversations about work-related issues and experiencing the financial consequences of cancer and/or its treatment as burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: Although conversations about work-related issues are generally experienced as helpful by cancer survivors, early access to work-related psychosocial cancer care in the hospital setting is not yet systematically offered.
Authors: Sara Paltrinieri; Stefania Fugazzaro; Lucia Bertozzi; Maria Chiara Bassi; Martina Pellegrini; Massimo Vicentini; Elisa Mazzini; Stefania Costi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mary Stergiou-Kita; Cheryl Pritlove; D Linn Holness; Bonnie Kirsh; Dwayne van Eerd; Andrea Duncan; Jennifer Jones Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Damien Bennett; Therese Kearney; David W Donnelly; Amy Downing; Penny Wright; Sarah Wilding; Richard Wagland; Eila Watson; Adam Glaser; Anna Gavin Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Leonore F Albers; Mirjam A van Belzen; Christel van Batenburg; Vivian Engelen; H Putter; Rob C M Pelger; Henk W Elzevier Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amber D Zegers; Pieter Coenen; Mirjam van Belzen; Vivian Engelen; Carol Richel; Desiree J S Dona; Allard J van der Beek; Saskia F A Duijts Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Christine Bennink; Marjolein van der Klift; Hans Scheurer; Pieter Sonneveld; Saskia F A Duijts Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 2.328