| Literature DB >> 33036308 |
Peter T Ruane1,2, Cheryl M J Tan1,2, Daman J Adlam1,2, Susan J Kimber3, Daniel R Brison1,2,4, John D Aplin1,2, Melissa Westwood1,2.
Abstract
Embryo implantation begins with blastocyst trophectoderm (TE) attachment to the endometrial epithelium, followed by the breaching of this barrier by TE-derived trophoblast. Dynamic protein modification with O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAcylation) is mediated by O-GlcNAc transferase and O-GlcNAcase (OGA), and couples cellular metabolism to stress adaptation. O-GlcNAcylation is essential for blastocyst formation, but whether there is a role for this system at implantation remains unexplored. Here, we used OGA inhibitor thiamet g (TMG) to induce raised levels of O-GlcNAcylation in mouse blastocysts and human trophoblast cells. In an in vitro embryo implantation model, TMG promoted mouse blastocyst breaching of the endometrial epithelium. TMG reduced expression of TE transcription factors Cdx2, Gata2 and Gata3, suggesting that O-GlcNAcylation stimulated TE differentiation to invasive trophoblast. TMG upregulated transcription factors OVOL1 and GCM1, and cell fusion gene ERVFRD1, in a cell line model of syncytiotrophoblast differentiation from human TE at implantation. Therefore O-GlcNAcylation is a conserved pathway capable of driving trophoblast differentiation. TE and trophoblast are sensitive to physical, chemical and nutritive stress, which can occur as a consequence of maternal pathophysiology or during assisted reproduction, and may lead to adverse neonatal outcomes and associated adult health risks. Further investigation of how O-GlcNAcylation regulates trophoblast populations arising at implantation is required to understand how peri-implantation stress affects reproductive outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: embryo implantation; extra-embryonic development; implantation failure; protein O-GlcNAcylation; stress; transcription factors; trophoblast differentiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33036308 PMCID: PMC7599815 DOI: 10.3390/cells9102246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Details of antibodies used in this study.
| Antibody (Clone/Catalogue Number) | Source |
|---|---|
| O-GlcNAc (RL2) | Biolegend (London, UK) |
| OGA (14711-1-AP) | Proteintech (Manchester, UK) |
| OGT (D1D8Q) | Cell Signaling Technologies (London, UK) |
| CDX2 (D11D10) | Cell Signaling Technologies |
| GATA3 (MAB6330) | R & D Systems (Abingdon, UK) |
Details of PCR primers used in this study.
| Gene | Primers (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
|
| CACCAATCGTGTCATCTTTCTGG |
|
| TTGGCAATTAAACAGAATCCCCT |
|
| CATAGGATGTTTTGGCGAGAGAT |
|
| CAAGGACGTGAGCATGTATCC |
|
| CACCCCGCCGTATTGAATG |
|
| CTCGGCCATTCGTACATGGAA |
|
| GCGCATGTTTCCTTTCTTGAG |
|
| ACCGATCTGTTCAGCAATGAAG |
|
| ATCCCTCACCTCTCCTCTCC |
|
| CTACCAGTTACATCGCCTACTTG |
|
| AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG |
|
| TGAACCGCCACATGAAGTGTC |
|
| CCAATTCCAGCGGGTAATCTT |
|
| ACCGCCATCCTGATTTCCC |
|
| CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA |
Figure 1E4.5 mouse blastocysts were cultured for 24 h to E5.5 in the absence (control) or presence of 5 µM TMG. (A) Fixed blastocysts stained with phalloidin to label actin filaments (red), DAPI to label nuclei (blue) and RL2 anti-O-GlcNAcylated protein antibody (green). Fluorescence microscopy was performed with optical sectioning, and maximum intensity projections of optical sections are shown. Scale bars 20 µm. (B) Quantification of RL2 anti-O-GlcNAcylated protein antibody mean fluorescence intensity in blastocysts (arbitrary units) (n = 4 blastocysts from two independent experiments; median ± interquartile range (IQR); * p < 0.05 Control vs. TMG; Mann–Whitney). (C) Fixed blastocysts were stained with anti-OGA antibody (green) or (D) anti-OGT antibody (green), together with phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue), and imaged as described. Maximum intensity projections are shown. Scale bars 20 µm. (E) RNA was extracted from groups of ten blastocysts and qPCR was performed to measure the expression of Gfpt1, Ogt and Oga (n = 5; median ± IQR; ** p < 0.01 Control vs. TMG; Mann–Whitney).
Figure 2E5.5 blastocysts, previously untreated (control) or treated with 5 µM TMG were co-cultured with Ishikawa cell layers for 48h. (A) The percentage of stably attached embryos was monitored throughout co-culture (n = 4; 12–16 embryos per experiment; mean ± SEM). (B) Co-cultures were fixed after 48 h and stained with phalloidin to label actin (red) and DAPI to label nuclei (blue). Fluorescence microscopy with optical sectioning allowed for the determination of embryonic breaching of the Ishikawa cell layer. Dotted lines indicate embryo–Ishikawa interface. Single optical sections are shown in lower panels and Z-stacks of optical sections in upper panels. Arrows indicate position of optical section and Z-stack. Embryos and Ishikawa cell are labelled. Scale bars 20 µm. (C) Percentage embryos that have breached the Ishikawa cell layer (n = 4; 12–16 embryos per experiment; median ± IQR; * p < 0.05; Mann–Whitney test).
Figure 3(A) qPCR was performed on groups of ten blastocysts to measure gene expression (n = 4–5; median ± IQR; ** p<0.01 Control vs. TMG; Mann–Whitney test). (B) Fixed blastocysts were stained with phalloidin (red), DAPI (blue) and anti-CDX2 antibody (green) or (C) anti-GATA3 antibody (green). Fluorescence microscopy was performed with optical sectioning, with maximum intensity projections shown. Scale bars 20 µm. (D) Quantification of anti-CDX2 and (E) anti-GATA3 antibody mean fluorescence intensity in blastocysts (arbitrary units). (n = 7–8 blastocysts from two independent experiments; median ± IQR; * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 Control vs. TMG; Mann–Whitney).
Figure 4BeWo cells were treated for 24 h with DMSO (forskolin vehicle control), treated with 5 µM TMG and DMSO for 24 h, treated with 50 µM forskolin (Fsk) for 24 h, or treated with 5 µM TMG and 50 µM Fsk. (A–C) BeWo cells were immunostained with phalloidin (red), DAPI (blue) and (A) anti-O-GlcNAc antibody (green), or (B) anti-OGA antibody (green), or (C) anti-OGT antibody (green). Quantification of O-GlcNAc, OGA and OGT immunostaining mean fluorescence intensity (arbitrary units) is shown (n = 15 fields of view from three independent experiments, median ± IQR; * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 Control vs. TMG; Kruskal–Wallis). (D–F) qPCR was performed on BeWo cells to determine the expression of (D) OVOL1, (E) GCM1 and (F) ERVFRD1 (n = 3–5; median ± IQR; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; Kruskal–Wallis).