Literature DB >> 28911212

Apposition to endometrial epithelial cells activates mouse blastocysts for implantation.

Peter T Ruane1,2, Stéphane C Berneau1,2, Rebekka Koeck1,2, Jessica Watts1,2, Susan J Kimber3, Daniel R Brison1,2,4, Melissa Westwood1,2, John D Aplin1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How do interactions between blastocyst-stage embryos and endometrial epithelial cells regulate the early stages of implantation in an in vitro model? SUMMARY ANSWER: Mouse blastocyst apposition with human endometrial epithelial cells initiates trophectoderm differentiation to trophoblast, which goes on to breach the endometrial epithelium. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In vitro models using mouse blastocysts and human endometrial cell lines have proven invaluable in the molecular characterisation of embryo attachment to endometrial epithelium at the onset of implantation. Genes involved in embryonic breaching of the endometrial epithelium have not been investigated in such in vitro models. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study used an established in vitro model of implantation to examine cellular and molecular interactions during blastocyst attachment to endometrial epithelial cells. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Mouse blastocysts developed from embryonic day (E) 1.5 in vitro were hatched and co-cultured with confluent human endometrial adenocarcinoma-derived Ishikawa cells in serum-free medium. A scale of attachment stability based on blastocyst oscillation upon agitation was devised. Blastocysts were monitored for 48 h to establish the kinetics of implantation, and optical sectioning using fluorescence microscopy revealed attachment and invasion interfaces. Quantitative PCR was used to determine blastocyst gene expression. Data from a total of 680 mouse blastocysts are reported, with 3-6 experimental replicates. T-test and ANOVA analyses established statistical significance at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Hatched E4.5 mouse blastocysts exhibited weak attachment to confluent Ishikawa cells over the first 24 h of co-culture, with intermediate and stable attachment occurring from 28 h (E5.5 + 4 h) in a hormone-independent manner. Attached embryos fixed after 48 h (E6.5) frequently exhibited outgrowths, characterised morphologically and with antibody markers as trophoblast giant cells (TGCs), which had breached the Ishikawa cell layer. Beginning co-culture at E5.5 also resulted in intermediate and stable attachment from E5.5 + 4 h; however, these embryos did not go on to breach the Ishikawa cell layer, even when co-culture was extended to E7.5 (P < 0.01). Blastocysts cultured from E4.5 in permeable transwell inserts above Ishikawa cells before transfer to direct co-culture at E5.5 went on to attach but failed to breach the Ishikawa cell layer by E6.5 (P < 0.01). Gene expression analysis at E5.5 demonstrated that direct co-culture with Ishikawa cells from E4.5 resulted in downregulation of trophectoderm transcription factors Cdx2 (P < 0.05) and Gata3 (P < 0.05) and upregulation of the TGC transcription factor Hand1 (P < 0.05). Co-culture with non-endometrial human fibroblasts did not alter the expression of these genes. LARGE SCALE DATA: None. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The in vitro model used here combines human carcinoma-derived endometrial cells with mouse embryos, in which the cellular interactions observed may not fully recapitulate those in vivo. The data gleaned from such models can be regarded as hypothesis-generating, and research is now needed to develop more sophisticated models of human implantation combining multiple primary endometrial cell types with surrogate and real human embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This study implicates blastocyst apposition to endometrial epithelial cells as a critical step in trophoblast differentiation required for implantation. Understanding this maternal regulation of the embryonic developmental programme may lead to novel treatments for infertility. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by funds from the charities Wellbeing of Women (RG1442) and Diabetes UK (15/0005207), and studentship support for SCB from the Anatomical Society. No conflict of interest is declared.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  embryo development; endometrium; implantation; transcription factors; trophoblast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28911212     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gax043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  15 in total

1.  Transcriptomic analysis of the interaction of choriocarcinoma spheroids with receptive vs. non-receptive endometrial epithelium cell lines: an in vitro model for human implantation.

Authors:  Paula Vergaro; Gustavo Tiscornia; Amelia Rodríguez; Josep Santaló; Rita Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Tracking placental development in health and disease.

Authors:  John D Aplin; Jenny E Myers; Kate Timms; Melissa Westwood
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Integrated Systems Biology Approach Identifies Novel Maternal and Placental Pathways of Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Nandor Gabor Than; Roberto Romero; Adi Laurentiu Tarca; Katalin Adrienna Kekesi; Yi Xu; Zhonghui Xu; Kata Juhasz; Gaurav Bhatti; Ron Joshua Leavitt; Zsolt Gelencser; Janos Palhalmi; Tzu Hung Chung; Balazs Andras Gyorffy; Laszlo Orosz; Amanda Demeter; Anett Szecsi; Eva Hunyadi-Gulyas; Zsuzsanna Darula; Attila Simor; Katalin Eder; Szilvia Szabo; Vanessa Topping; Haidy El-Azzamy; Christopher LaJeunesse; Andrea Balogh; Gabor Szalai; Susan Land; Olga Torok; Zhong Dong; Ilona Kovalszky; Andras Falus; Hamutal Meiri; Sorin Draghici; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Manuel Krispin; Martin Knöfler; Offer Erez; Graham J Burton; Chong Jai Kim; Gabor Juhasz; Zoltan Papp
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) is expressed by endometrial epithelium that regulates receptivity and trophoblast adhesion.

Authors:  Saniya Laheri; Nancy Ashary; Purvi Bhatt; Deepak Modi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  An oviduct-on-a-chip provides an enhanced in vitro environment for zygote genome reprogramming.

Authors:  Marcia A M M Ferraz; Hoon Suk Rho; Daiane Hemerich; Heiko H W Henning; Helena T A van Tol; Michael Hölker; Urban Besenfelder; Michal Mokry; Peter L A M Vos; Tom A E Stout; Séverine Le Gac; Bart M Gadella
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Characterisation of Osteopontin in an In Vitro Model of Embryo Implantation.

Authors:  Stéphane C Berneau; Peter T Ruane; Daniel R Brison; Susan J Kimber; Melissa Westwood; John D Aplin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Application of extracellular flux analysis for determining mitochondrial function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos.

Authors:  Bethany Muller; Niamh Lewis; Tope Adeniyi; Henry J Leese; Daniel R Brison; Roger G Sturmey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effects of hyaluronate-containing medium on human embryo attachment to endometrial epithelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Peter T Ruane; Chelsea J Buck; Phoebe A Babbington; Wedad Aboussahoud; Stéphane C Berneau; Melissa Westwood; Susan J Kimber; John D Aplin; Daniel R Brison
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-02-28

9.  Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals regulatory mechanism for trophoblast cell-fate divergence in human peri-implantation conceptuses.

Authors:  Bo Lv; Qin An; Qiao Zeng; Xunyi Zhang; Ping Lu; Yanqiu Wang; Xianmin Zhu; Yazhong Ji; Guoping Fan; Zhigang Xue
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Protein O-GlcNAcylation Promotes Trophoblast Differentiation at Implantation.

Authors:  Peter T Ruane; Cheryl M J Tan; Daman J Adlam; Susan J Kimber; Daniel R Brison; John D Aplin; Melissa Westwood
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.