Literature DB >> 33034047

Examining gender diversity growth as a model for inclusion of all underrepresented persons in medical physics.

Maxine van Zyl1, Elijah M K Haynes2, Deidre Batchelar3,4, Jennifer M Jakobi2.   

Abstract

The labor force of Medical Physics is one of the most gender diverse in the field of Physics, as it has attained the proportional achievement of ~30% women worldwide (Tsapaki et al. Phys Medica. 2018;55:33-39). While great strides have been made toward a gender diverse workforce, women still comprise an underrepresented group. Many strategies have been suggested to increase the participation of underrepresented persons by addressing unconscious biases, increasing opportunities, dedicated hiring policies, and providing support networks in science and medicine (Barabino et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019; Coe et al. Lancet. 2019), yet the personnel landscape remains largely uniform. Herein, the conditions, strategies, and approaches that facilitated gender diversity in Medical Physics are considered as a means to further the inclusion of other underrepresented groups through exemplars of mentorship, addressing unconscious biases and the implementation of inclusive practices. Furthermore, the potential for gender diversity to act as a catalyst to create an environment that is more accepting of diversity and supports and encourages inclusive practices for the participation and inclusion of other underrepresented groups in Medical Physics is discussed.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate in Medical Physics; gender diversity; inclusion; underrepresented persons

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33034047      PMCID: PMC7839666          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  38 in total

1.  Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering.

Authors:  Tara C Dennehy; Nilanjana Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.

Authors:  Rong Su; James Rounds; Patrick Ian Armstrong
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Social discrimination and social justice.

Authors:  Dinesh Bhugra
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-29

4.  Medical physics workforce: A global perspective.

Authors:  Virginia Tsapaki; Slavik Tabakov; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 5.  Defining gender disparities in pain management.

Authors:  Linda Leresche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors.

Authors:  Erin A Strong; Rochelle De Castro; Dana Sambuco; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel; Kent A Griffith; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Climate control: The relationship between social identity threat and cues to an identity-safe culture.

Authors:  William Hall; Toni Schmader; Audrey Aday; Michelle Inness; Elizabeth Croft
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-07-26

8.  Women who win prizes get less money and prestige.

Authors:  Yifang Ma; Diego F M Oliveira; Teresa K Woodruff; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?

Authors:  Luke Holman; Devi Stuart-Fox; Cindy E Hauser
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields.

Authors:  Rong Su; James Rounds
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.